2402160400F HUMANITY?

This human species is generally defined as a group, or grouping, of individuals that are capable of ‘SUCCESSFULLY’ procreating – with the emphasis on ‘SUCCESSFULLY’!

Successful being the reproduction of offspring that in turn are also capable of successful reproduction on and on as it were.

Therefore ‘copulation’ does not equate to successful ‘procreation’ regardless of species – viable progeny being the determining in what is or is not a specific species.

We know that archaic humans where indeed human because we carry to this day their genetics – be that good or bad.

And yet the diversity between male humans and female human is so great that we’re almost to the point of being separate species altogether.

The most accurate words you’ll hear in this lecture is “……….we don’t know anything about…..”

As much as feminists hate male humans, the big truth is that a female human can’t procreate without the aid of at least one male human; while male humans are scientifically capable of procreation without the aid of female humans.

Consider Acts 17:26 “….HATH MADE OF ONE BLOOD ALL NATIONS OF MEN……..”

Acts 17:24 God that made the world and all things therein, seeing that he is Lord of heaven and earth, dwelleth not in temples made with hands;
25 Neither is worshipped with men’s hands, as though he needed any thing, seeing he giveth to all life, and breath, and all things;
26 And hath made of one blood all nations of men for to dwell on all the face of the earth, and hath determined the times before appointed, and the bounds of their habitation;
27 That they should seek the Lord, if haply they might feel after him, and find him, though he be not far from every one of us: (kjv)

Posted by: Gresham College ~ 4 weeks ago ~ 539K views ~ 2
“Why Is There Only One Species of Human? - Robin May”

PS1. Where would a modern lecture be if it didn’t disparage the male contribution(s) to human history with such as physical “right of conquest.” The “right of conquest” is superciliously looked down upon by female humans in their arrogant process of putting on pretentious heirs. THE BIG TRUTH is that women will, and have always, laid down with the male victors regardless of who they’ve been. The “right of conquest” becomes acceptable all of a sudden?

PS2. Is it bigotry that causes this gentleman to speak of archaic humans as though they’re other than just that somewhat strange family in that house down the street on the corner – that’s what they really are, after all.

PS3. Notice how the female moderator inquired as to whether interbreeding was predominantly by males or females. They never miss a chance to disparage male humans.

PS4. Feel free to correct any errors that yu may perceive – and thanks in advance.

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Cop·u·la·tion
/ˌkäpyəˈlāSH(ə)n/
noun

1. sexual intercourse:
   "males may seek copulation with the breeding female"

Powered by Oxford Languages

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Pro·cre·a·tion
/ˌprōkrēˈāSH(ə)n/
noun

1. the production of offspring; reproduction:
   "in general animals copulate purely for the purpose of procreation"

Powered by Oxford Languages

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Di·ver·si·ty
/dəˈvərsədē/
noun

1. the state of being diverse; variety:
   "there was considerable diversity in the style of the reports"

▪ a range of different things:
"newspapers were obliged to allow a diversity of views to be printed"

2. the practice or quality of including or involving people from a range of different social and ethnic backgrounds and of different genders, sexual orientations, etc.:
   "equality and diversity should be supported for their own sake"

Word Origin:
Middle English: from Old French diversite, from Latin diversitas, from diversus ‘diverse’, past participle of divertere ‘turn aside’ (see divert).

Powered by Oxford Languages