slug.com slug.com

1 1

"...Far from the 3.4% predicted by the WHO back February, or the 1% used by the Imperial Model, all the serological studies done to this point average out at about 0.2%.

Here are some recent examples:

On May 19th Dr John Ioannidis et al published their review of global cases, which found lethality ranging between 0.02% and 0.4%.

On May 4th Dr Hendrilk Streeck et al published a study done in Germany which found an infection fatality rate (IFR) of <0.36%.

Another study from Stanford University, published on April 30th and this time focusing on Santa Clara county, found an IFR of 0.17%

A study done in the Guilan province of Iran, published on May 1st, found an IFR of 0.12%.

On April 21st, theUniversity of Southern California (USC) published their study on the population of Los Angeles county, which found an IFR of <0.2%.

This list is far from exhaustive, visit SWPRS.org for more examples...."

Heresiarch 8 Aug 13
Share

Be part of the movement!

Welcome to the community for those who value free speech, evidence and civil discourse.

Create your free account

1 comment

Feel free to reply to any comment by clicking the "Reply" button.

2

SHHH!!!

DON’t tell anyone. There’s an election at stake.

In MARCH, 2020, an epidemiologist in my area of a Large Ca. city, did a rough blood test sampling, and found, .02% to.05% deaths after infection, rate. This is I believe going to be the norm, when they throw out the heavy handed methods of counting deaths. The corruption that can Close Down most Countries economies, Is Some Bit Of Corruption!!!

You can include a link to this post in your posts and comments by including the text q:122205
Slug does not evaluate or guarantee the accuracy of any content. Read full disclaimer.