I'm trying to disprove the study in this article
Can someone with more experience than I in these types of studies point me to where it is wrong?
I'm looking for informed specifics having to do with methodology, results, or data interpretation. Not looking for confirmation bias or dunning kruger please
Why do you have to disprove a "may have caused" from an economist writing for Forbes Magazine? All of these facts, are enough for me to completely discount it. The investors are looking for reasons to fear "Outbreaks", which mean certain stocks will be a buy. No one in this economist's mind really cares if it true or not. Selling and buying occurs when someones "theory" of a stocks potential to rise or fall is believed by enough traders. This is the noise all stock holders learn to ignore. It is like CNN except it can cost you real money!
The guy is a economist not an immunologist, or even a doctor. Forbes is a magazine that covers economic news he just pushing a narrative that he hopes will sell a vaccine that he has invested in.
@TheMiddleWay these results were made from a projection program exactly like the ones used to create the hysteria caused the first panic that never happened. the real count of cases from people that were at the event is less than 300 and there is no proof they got the virus at the event.
@TheMiddleWay from Governor Kristi Noem on FB page it is a news report/interview from fox news
The projection modeling is done with computer models that have proved themselves very unreliable in predicting many things from economic trends , environmental change and disease spread, these modeling programs are one of the worst software to come out of the software industry.
@TheMiddleWay this is were you can get your very own software enter data to create your own pandemic
[eclipse.org]
Exactly!