slug.com slug.com

1 1

Should COVID19 vaccine be for young people with little risk of harm from disease

The new vaccine is being pushed at high speed with some kind of certificate that will be used to limit access to social and work opportunities. The end result is that the vaccine will disproportionately be distributed to the younger populations who are by all measures least at risk of hospitalization, long term harm, or death from the disease but have most at stake in terms of long term effects of vaccine with no real chance of compensation from bad consequences. Particularly troubling is the complete rejection of concerns about possible fertility impacts, particularly for females, where the newly generated mRNA antibodies can mistake fetal and placental development proteins as a virus. The evidence of an aged-corrupted government is that they are not concerned at all for the future generations, not only the younger generation, but the generation not yet born, all in order to avoid the embarrassment of old people dying from a viral pneumonia instead of some other cause a few months later.

KENeumeister 5 Dec 4
Share

Be part of the movement!

Welcome to the community for those who value free speech, evidence and civil discourse.

Create your free account

1 comment

Feel free to reply to any comment by clicking the "Reply" button.

0

"Should COVID19 vaccine be for young people with little risk of harm from disease"

Is there a choice?

[dollarvigilante.com]
[dollarvigilante.tv]

@dd54

The simple English version is: You are a slave. Your master owns you, and does with you what pleases the master, not the slave. You have no say. You will obey. If you do not obey, you will pay for making you obey.

Subsidized Slavery.

Those who say no, won't even attempt to prove it, and those who provide the evidence to those who say no will OBEY THE ORDER to place the evidence out of view: "There is no evidence."

"The validity of the public debt of the United States, authorized by law, including debts incurred for payment of pensions and bounties for services in suppressing insurrection or rebellion, shall not be questioned."

There is no evidence.

There is no evidence.

There is no evidence...because there is no law.

"Plaintiff admitted that it, in combination with the Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis, which are for all practical purposes, because of there interlocking activity and practices, and both being Banking Institutions Incorporated under the Laws of the United States, are in the Law to be treated as one and the same Bank, did create the entire 14,000.00 in money or credit upon its own books by bookkeeping entry. That this was the Consideration used to support the Note dated May 8, 1964 and the Mortgage of the same date. The money and credit first came into existence when they created it. Mr. Morgan admitted that no United States Law or Statute existed which gave him the right to do this. A lawful consideration must exist and be tendered to support the Note. See Anheuser-Bush Brewing co. V. Emma Mason, 44 Minn. 318. The Jury found there was no lawful consideration and I agree. Only God can create something of value out of nothing."
STATE OF MINNESOTA
COUNTY OF SCOTT
First National Bank of Montgomery, Plaintiff
vs
Jerome Daly, Defendant.
December 9, 1968

If they can confuse people into thinking that the people who can add zeros to their account and spend the money they create by ledger (or now computer) entry are your Masters, they can convince you that you owe them money because they lend money to your other Masters who had already taxed you into poverty.

Think about that if you still have a brain, not you dd54, people jerking their knees and saying "There is no evidence."

The same people who can give themselves enough money to buy anything that can be bought everyone on this Planet (MONEY IS NO OBJECT) say, through the politicians they buy, that you owe them a lot of money.

And I'm called a Conspiracy Theorist, without evidence, and so what does that make you, a Conspiracy Denier?

I am a lone gunman, worthy of ridicule, or worse, a terrorist worthy of immediate assassination, at least my character assassinated, but you deny that there are any groups of people conspiring to do wrong, no organized crime at all, anywhere: "There is no evidence."

Don't question the official orders to pay.

[usdebtclock.org]

82,863 per citizen

"...the government has taken ownership of our children..."

82,863 per citizen

It isn't the government. It is a counterfeit version of government. I can prove it, have proven it, but "there is no evidence."

There is no evidence.

You can include a link to this post in your posts and comments by including the text q:158284
Slug does not evaluate or guarantee the accuracy of any content. Read full disclaimer.