Derek Chauvin Juror speaks out, raises questions-
[redstate.com]
2
Be part of the movement!
Welcome to the community for those who value free speech, evidence and civil discourse.Create your free account
1 comment
Feel free to reply to any comment by clicking the "Reply" button.This alternate juror specifically described not wanting to see more rioting if they didn’t reach a guilty verdict.
When a trial was this high-profile, every attempt to protect the integrity of the system should have been taken. If this trial didn’t warrant a change of venue and sequestering the jury throughout the trial, both legal options for a judge, then what trial ever will? I simply do not understand how taking every precaution wasn’t warranted here.
Surely this is "jury intimidation!!"
w0tn0t
Level 8
Apr 23, 2021
3
Be part of the movement!
Welcome to the community for those who value free speech, evidence and civil discourse.Create your free account
Share this post
Categories
Slug does not evaluate or guarantee the accuracy of any content. Read full disclaimer.