slug.com slug.com

3 2

LINK It's not just you: New data shows more than half of young people in America don't have a romantic partner - SFGate

Given that research has rather conclusivlvely show that marraige and children are really good predicters of the stability of individuals and cultures, what does it say when so many of our young people cannot find 'romantic partners'? (Leaving aside asking what it says about our culture that we use a word like 'romantic partner' to replace previous societies call for 'spouse and children'.)

VonO 7 Mar 22
Share

Be part of the movement!

Welcome to the community for those who value free speech, evidence and civil discourse.

Create your free account

3 comments

Feel free to reply to any comment by clicking the "Reply" button.

0

Why get married when you can live together? Why have children when the feminazis are espousing abortion and saying that women should not be held prisoner by having to be responsible for caring for children. According to feminist women need to contribute to society by working, if they get pregnant, it is their responsibility to get an abortion because there are too many people on the planet. The family is what holds a society together, the family structure here in AMERICA is under attack. SOCIALIST do NOT want a family structure, it is easier to control people if they love only themselves.

0

Feminism, radical environmentalism and porn. Amazing we still have children.

Those certainly are part of the issue. From a Christian standpoint I would add gnosticism and princessism.

0

I've known plenty of married couples with children who were anything but stable...

Obviously. It's an averages thing.. not an 'every single case' thing.

averages... averages...

You can include a link to this post in your posts and comments by including the text q:24065
Slug does not evaluate or guarantee the accuracy of any content. Read full disclaimer.