Courts Not Of Law V
by Joe Kelley
4-14-2022

Dr. Reiner Fuellmich – Phase 2: Actual Trial & Enforcement of Judgement
APR 11, 2022, 24360 Views
[zeeemedia.com]

Time 44:28
“...the jury will have to decide on this, and its the jury of the people...”

“...I hope people will do their own thing in their own countries...”

What might be the meaning intended when someone interchanges the words Nation with Country or Federation with Nation and Country? More importantly, perhaps, what is a valid legal jurisdiction according to those authorities authorized in those validated legal jurisdictions?

“It was anciently called “trial per pais”—that is “trial by the country.” And now, in every criminal trial, the jury are told that the accused “has, for trial, put himself upon the country; which country you (the jury) are.”

"The object of this trial “by the country,” or by the people, in preference to a trial by the government, is to guard against every species of oppression by the government. In order to effect this end, it is indispensable that the people, or “the country,” judge of and determine their own liberties against the government; instead of the government’s judging of and determining its own powers over the people. How is it possible that juries can do anything to protect the liberties of the people against the government, if they are not allowed to determine what those liberties are?

“Any government, that is its own judge of, and determines authoritatively for the people, what are its own powers over the people, is an absolute government of course. It has all the powers that it chooses to exercise. There is no other—or at least no more accurate—definition of a despotism than this.

“On the other hand, any people, that judge of, and determine authoritatively for the government, what are their own liberties against the government, of course retain all the liberties they wish to enjoy. And this is freedom. At least, it is freedom to them; because, although it may be theoretically imperfect, it, nevertheless, corresponds to their highest notions of freedom.

“To secure this right of the people to judge of their own liberties against the government, the jurors are taken, (or must be, to make them lawful jurors,) from the body of the people, by lot, or by some process that precludes any previous knowledge, choice, or selection of them, on the part of the government. This is done to prevent the government’s constituting a jury of its own partisans or friends; in other words, to prevent the government’s packing a jury, with a view to maintain its own laws, and accomplish its own purposes.

“It is supposed that, if twelve men be taken, by lot, from the mass of the people, without the possibility of any previous knowledge, choice, or selection of them, on the part of the government, the jury will be a fair epitome of “the country” at large, and not merely of the party or faction that sustain the measures of the government; that substantially all classes of opinions, prevailing among the people, will be represented in the jury; and especially that the opponents of the government, (if the government have any opponents,) will be represented there, as well as its friends; that the classes, who are oppressed by the laws of the government, (if any are thus oppressed,) will have their representatives in the jury, as well as those classes, who take sides with the oppressor—that is, with the government.

“It is fairly presumable that such a tribunal will agree to no conviction except such as substantially the whole country would agree to, if they were present, taking part in the trial. A trial by such a tribunal is, therefore, in effect, “a trial by the country.” In its results it probably comes as near to a trial by the whole country, as any trial that it is practicable to have, without too great inconvenience and expense. And as unanimity is required for a conviction, it follows that no one can be convicted, except for the violation of such laws as substantially the whole country wish to have maintained. The government can enforce none of its laws, (by punishing offenders, through the verdicts of juries,) except such as substantially the whole people wish to have enforced. The government, therefore, consistently with the trial by jury, can exercise no powers over the people, (or, what is the same thing, over the accused person, who represents the rights of the people,) except such as substantially the whole people of the country consent that it may exercise. In such a trial, therefore, “the country,” or the people, judge of and determine their own liberties against the government, instead of the government’s judging of and determining its own powers over the people.

"But all this “trial by the country” would be no trial at all “by the country,” but only a trial by the government, if the government could either declare who may, and who may not, be jurors, or could dictate to the jury anything whatever, either of law or evidence, that is of the essence of the trial.

“If the government may decide who may, and who may not, be jurors, it will of course select only its partisans, and those friendly to its measures. It may not only prescribe who may, and who may not, be eligible to be drawn as jurors; but it may also question each person drawn as a juror, as to his sentiments in regard to the particular law involved in each trial, before suffering him to be sworn on the panel; and exclude him if he be found unfavorable to the maintenance of such a law.”
Essay on The Trial by Jury, Lysander Spooner, 1852

A country is the people not the place. The people make the place a country when the people defend each other by holding each other to an accurate accounting of the facts, not the opinions of the criminals, rather the facts that matter in each case when and where differences of opinions matter. Not black lives matter more than white lives, or government matters matter more than people matters matter. If an authority in a claimed jurisdiction claims that the National Interest must be served by killing all the people, one might then see the value in questioning those claims of authority on moral grounds, such as would be the case if the whole truth mattered.

Facts matter in each case, because opinions are often not merely false, opinions are often willfully falsified with malevolent intent.

As the innocent bodies pile up and are driven into mass graves by order followers following criminal orders blindly, those not yet murdered may suddenly wise up, or not.

Criminals are known when they confess their malevolence with orders that are claimed to be required actions do be done by targeted people whose internal moral conscience is over-ruled by the criminals issuing the orders that they say are orders to be obeyed without question such as:

XIV - Citizen rights not to be abridged
Passed by Congress June 13, 1866. Ratified July 9, 1868
“The validity of the public debt of the United States, authorized by law, including debts incurred for payment of pensions and bounties for services in suppressing insurrection or rebellion, shall not be questioned.”

That is a self-confessing, self-exposing, self-evident, self-extracting, self-debriefing, self-resolving and a self-convicting case of Treasonous Fraud on the Public Record as a Public Notice written and authorized by Treasonous Frauds during a Treasonous Fraud crime scene, paid for by the people in a Nation-State Legal Fiction Confidence Scheme.

The Public owes nothing whatsoever to Treasonous Frauds ever, yet the lie continues to work since 1787.

People can move accusations to other people and people can move accusations to grand juries in County Jurisdictions formed because people are dying like flies in that county and the evidence suggests that those dead people are murdered by specified suspects named on True Bills, such as:

Anthony Fauci

Bill Gates

I did not pull those names out of my ass, and anyone with a care-in-the-world for all those dead people in their County Jurisdictions might consider listening to the video above, which is a Public Notice on The Public Record, a Public Notice re-posted another time by myself, here and now, because the cause is a lawful, legal, moral cause of action at law, voluntary and defensive, a demand for a lawful jurisdiction, a ready-made cause of action at law. 

Not a Civil Case in a False Federal Legal Fiction District Jurisdiction run by known, confessed, pedophiles. The law of the land in America has been, is, and will continue to be The Ancient Law for as long as the people choose facts over fictions.

The accusation goes to the county grand jury, an independent body of those best able to validate accusations based upon facts found by the accuser and facts validated by the grand jurors who command all legal jurisdiction including all writs, all warrants, subpoena, mandamus, quo warranto, and posse comitatus, to ensure that the accusation is validated and the people in the County are protected from all enemies of life, liberty, property, the pursuit of happiness, including the means to protect all, and that means protecting all from all enemies foreign as well as domestic, and that means that no one anywhere on the planet is above suspicion when the bodies are piling up, and no one escapes accurate accountability because they are waving a false flag of immunity.

Why look under rocks for the culprits while culprits are actively waving their false flags of immunity while claiming that their orders cannot be questioned?

They are self-confessing criminals in fact. 

No one is above the law, and therefore someone claiming to be above the law is someone waving a Pirate Flag such as The Jolly Roger or the infamous Swastika.

The symbol and sign say: "I confess that I am a criminal, in fact, obey blindly, and do not attempt to prosecute me." 

GEN FLYNN JUST DROPPED A BOMBSHELL!!!
[facebook.com]

Time: 44:36
“For all your listeners: The Information War…”

Nationalists include those volunteering to remain inside common laws of free people as well as Nationalists who perceive morality as an exploitable weakness. The true measure of legal jurisdiction is the perception, acknowledgment, and prosecution of the facts that matter in each case where moral people are exploited by criminals. The name of the accused goes on a True Bill to invite the accused defendant to face the facts before a Criminal Trial Jury in a County Criminal Court of law, any of over 3,000 in America. 

Qui Non Prohibet Cum Potest Jubet

Sua Jura Libertates Suas

Judicium Parium Suorum

Jus Ad Bellum, Jus In Bello, Jus Post Bellum

Caveat Emptor