Local Domestic Distant Foreign I
by Joe Kelley
5-6-2022

All individual, private, disputes are settled inside the individual human being. The individual is born at the location the individual is born, or aborted, and not born at that location. If born, if not aborted, the individual is then breathing individual quantities of oxygen, and if not killed on the spot, the individual moves and contacts all the necessities required to avoid death, including avoidance of extreme, life-threatening, local, present, dangers, clearly in view, or hidden behind a thin veil of Treasonous Fraud.

“From the moment when the crown became accustomed to the ‘Inquest,’ a restraint was imposed upon every branch of the prerogative. The king could never be informed of his rights, but through the medium of the people. Every ‘extent’ by which he claimed the profits and advantages resulting from the casualties of tenure, every process by which he repressed the usurpations of the baronage, depended upon the ‘good men and true’ who were impanelled to ‘pass’ between the subject and the sovereign; and the thunder of the Exchequer at Westminster might be silenced by the honesty, the firmness, or the obstinacy, of one sturdy knight or yeoman in the distant shire.”
Essay on The Trial by Jury, Lysander Spooner, 1852

Foreign to Americans is domestic collective prerogatives. We the people are each on an equal prerogative local footing at each of our locations all the time.

Locals local to the location where an individual relocates by locomotion to the crime scene involving Treasonous Fraud are able to respond to the present dangers when those present dangers endangering the locals are cleared in the clearing in the light of day at the location of the crime scene as the victim suffers the injuries caused by the offending offenders wielding the now discovered Treasonous Fraud. No longer suffering injuries from unknown distant and foreign locations the light of discovery clears the local crime scene of darkness previously preventing a clear view of the weapons arming the culprits who cause the injuries inflicted upon the victims at the crime scene.

“Taxation was controlled in the same manner by the voice of those who were most liable to oppression. A jury was impanelled to adjudge the proportion due to the sovereign; and this course was not essentially varied, even after the right of granting aids to the crown was fully acknowledged to be vested in the parliament of the realm. The people taxed themselves; and the collection of the grants was checked and controlled, and, perhaps, in many instances evaded, by these virtual representatives of the community.
The principle of the jury was, therefore, not confined to its mere application as a mode of trying contested facts, whether in civil or criminal cases; and, both in its form and in its consequences, it had a very material influence upon the general constitution of the realm. The main-spring of the machinery of remedial justice existed in the franchise of the lower and lowest orders of the political hierarchy. Without the suffrage of the yeoman, the burgess, and the churl, the sovereign could not exercise the most important and most essential function of royalty; from them he received the power of life and death; he could not wield the sword of justice until the humblest of his subjects placed the weapon in his hand.”
Essay on The Trial by Jury, Lysander Spooner, 1852

Civil cases are private: oneself at the location of oneself, all the time. Criminal cases are cases where criminals connect to victims locally, where the local is injured at the location of the crime, where the criminal caused injury to the victim at the crime scene. Criminal cases are Public, endangering all individual civilized targeted victims targeted by local criminals locating civilized targets, turning civilized targets into victims, endangering we the people, the public, at each of our locations.

Executors of innocence carefully build a distant foreign feint, a Legal Fiction Boogieman, working behind a curtain of legalese fraud, pulling the strings attached as monetary rewards, to locals at the location of the crime scene where locals part with their liberty if not their lives, kidnapped, forced to labor for their tormentors, under the guise of Spreading Democracy, for The Greater Good, in The National Interest, carelessly transferring the power to defend power out of the hands of the locals and into the hands of the distant, foreign, costly, counterfeit defenders who offend with the power stolen by Treasonous Fraud.

"In March 1677 the proprietors issued the Concessions and Agreements, a document written largely by Edward Bylling, who was assisted by William Penn. It was signed by all the proprietors and freeholders of the colony. The Concessions and Agreements established a frame of government for West New Jersey. This was a highly liberal document – especially for a proprietary decree – that guaranteed no taxation save by consent of the people (“we put the power in the people” ), a representative assembly, trial by jury, full religious liberty (“no person to be called into question or molested for conscience under any pretext whatever” ), and no imprisonment for debt."
Conceived in Liberty, The Development of West New Jersey, Murray Rothbard, 1979

Locals at the location of the crime of Treasonous Fraud gather in the light of discovery, calling upon reason, logic, and moral common sense, resolving to end the transfer of power from the locals to the distant, foreign, offenders. Locals regain the power of defensive power, a power always located locally in each individual all the time, notwithstanding Treasonous Fraud.

“We also know that, by Magna Carta, amercements, or fines, could not be imposed to the ruin of the criminal; that, in the case of a freeman, his contenement, or means of subsisting in the condition of a freeman, must be saved to him; that, in the case of a merchant, his merchandise must be spared; and in the case of a villein, his waynage, or plough-tackle and carts. This also is likely to have been a princple of the common law, inasmuch as, in that rude age, when the means of getting employment as laborers was not what they are now, the man and his family would probably have been liable to starvation, if these means of subsistence had been taken from him.
We also know, generally, that, at the time of Magna Carta, all acts intrinsically criminal, all trespasses against persons and property, were crimes, according to lex terrae, or the common law.”
Essay on The Trial by Jury, Lysander Spooner, 1852

The cost of failing to locate the local Treasonous Frauds includes the failure to validate the cause to act in defense against ongoing costly transfers of power from the locals to the distant, foreign, oppressors.

Without the power of discovery, there is no power of validation. Invalid kidnappings imprison civil Americans in a foreign American Gulag, training civil Americans to follow orders without question.

Civilized cannibalism, we are training ourselves to eat our own, the cost of failing to discover, validate, and prosecute Treasonous Frauds.

“Nisi per legem terrae. But by the law of the land. For the true sense and exposition of these words, see the statute of 37 Edw. III., cap. 8, where the words, by the law of the land, are rendered without due process of law; for there it is said, though it be contained in the Great Charter, that no man be taken, imprisoned, or put out of his freehold, without process of the law; that is, by indictement or presentment of good and lawful men, where such deeds be done in due manner, or by writ original of the common law.”
Essay on The Trial by Jury, Lysander Spooner, 1852

The law of the local land defended by locals locally, locate locals who locally locate criminals tied forensically to distant foreign Treasonous Frauds, so as to move from discovery to validation by local County Criminal Grand Juries, then moving the local accused Treasonous Fraud suspect suspected by probable cause to warrant the suspect to appear as a defendant for their expedient local criminal Trial by Jury on the County Court of Law Schedule, lest more victims fall into the Hell of Treasonous Fraud at each County crime scene location, failing to discover, validate, and prosecute each Criminal Treasonous Fraud case from worst to least in that expedient order.

“Were the proposed examination of witnesses, on the part of the Defendant, to be allowed, the long established rules of law and justice would be at an end. It is a matter well known, and well understood, that by the laws of our country, every question which affects a man's life, reputation, or property, must be tried by twelve of his peers; and that their unanimous verdict is, alone, competent to determine the fact in issue. If then, you undertake to enquire, not only upon what foundation the charge is made, but, likewise, upon what foundation it is denied, you will, in effect, usurp the jurisdiction of the Petty Jury, you will supercede the legal authority of the court, in judging of the competency and admissibility of witnesses, and, having thus undertaken to try the question, that question may be determined by a bare majority, or by a much greater number of your body, than the twelve peers prescribed by the law of the land. This point has, I believe, excited some doubts upon former occasions but those doubts have never arisen in the mind of any lawyer, and they may easily be removed by a proper consideration of the subject. For, the bills, or presentments, found by a grand Jury, amount to nothing more than an official accusation, in order to put the party accused upon his trial: 'till the bill is returned, there is, therefore, no charge from which he can be required to exculpate himself; and we know that many persons, against whom bills were
returned, have been afterwards acquitted by a verdict of their country. Here then, is the just line of discrimination: It is the duty of the Grand Jury to enquire into the nature and probable grounds of the charge; but it is the exclusive province of the Petty Jury, to hear and determine, with the assistance, and under the direction of the court, upon points of law, whether the Defendant is, or is not guilty, on the whole evidence, for, as well as against, him. You will therefore, readily perceive, that if you examine the witnesses on both sides, you do not confine your consideration to the probable grounds of charge, but engage completely in the trial of the cause; and your return must, consequently, be tantamount to a verdict of acquital, or condemnation. But this would involve us in another difficulty; for, by the law it is declared that no man shall be twice put in jeopardy for the same offence: and, yet, it is certain that the enquiry, now proposed by the Grand Jury, would necessarily introduce the oppression of a double trial. Nor is it merely upon maxims of law, but, I think, likewise, upon principles

of humanity, that this innovation should be opposed. Considering the bill as an accusation grounded entirely upon the testimony in support of the prosecution, the Petty Jury receive no biass from the sanction which the indorsement of the Grand Jury has conferred upon it. But, on the other hand, would it not, in some degree, prejudice the most upright mind against the Defendant, that on a full hearing of his defence, another tribunal had pronounced it insufficient? which would then be the natural inference from every true bill. Upon the whole, the court is of opinion, that it would be improper and illegal to examine the witnesses, on behalf of the Defendant, while the charge against him lies before the Grand Jury.”
M'Kean, Chief Justice.
U.S. Supreme Court
RESPUBLICA v. SHAFFER, 1 U.S. 236
Court of Oyer and Terminer, at Philadelphia
February Sessions, 1788

Locating the time and date of the Treasonous Fraud location, as distant as it may be, remains to be ongoing injuries suffered by each victim at the location of their clearly present local injuries currently to this day.

“Without being brought in to answer but by due process of the common law.
No man be put to answer without presentment before justices, or thing of record, or by due process, or by writ original, according to the old law of the land.” - 2 Inst. 50.
The foregoing interpretations of the words nisi per legem terrae are corroborated by the following statutes, enacted in the next century after Magna Carta.
That no man, from henceforth, shall be attached by any accusation, nor forejudged of life or limb, nor his land, tenements, goods, nor chattels, seized into the king’s hands, against the form of the Great Charter, and the law of the land.” - St. 5 Edward III., Ch. 9. (1331.)
Whereas it is contained in the Great Charter of the franchises of England, that none shall be imprisoned, nor put out of his freehold, nor of his franchises, nor free customs, unless it be by the law of the land; it is accorded, assented, and established, that from henceforth none shall be taken by petition, or suggestion made to our lord the king, or to his council, unless it be by indictment of presentment of good and lawful people of the same neighborhood where such deeds be done in due manner, or by process made by writ original at the common law; nor that none be put out of his franchises, nor of his freehold, unless he be duly brough into answer, and forejudged of the same by the course of the law; and if anything be done against the same, it shall be redressed and holden for none.” - St. 25 Edward III., Ch. 4. (1350.)
That no man, of what estate or condition that he be, shall be put out of land or tenement, nor taken, nor imprisoned, nor disinherited, nor put to death, without being brought in answer by due process of law.” - St. 28 Edward III., Ch. 3. (1354.)
That no man be put to answer without presentment before justices, or matter of record, or by due process and writ original, according to the old law of the land. And if anything from henceforth be done to the contrary, it shall be void in law, and holden for error.” - St. 42 Edward III., Ch. 3. (1368.)
The foregoing interpretation of the words nisi per legem terrae - that is, by due process of law - including indictment, &c., has been adopted as the true one by modern writers and courts; as, for example, by Kent, (2 Comm. 13,) Story, (3 Comm. 661,) and Supreme Court of New York, (19 Wendell, 676; 4 Hill, 146.)
The fifth amendment to the constitution of the United States seems to have been framed on the same idea, inasmuch as it provides that “no person shall be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law.”
Essay on The Trial by Jury, Lysander Spooner, 1852

Before the next victim falls into the Hell of Treasonous Fraud the locals are charged with the duty to discover, validate, and prosecute Crimes Against Humanity and do so expediently.

Locals are located at the location locals locate the law of the land.

Use it or lose it.

XIV - Citizen rights not to be abridged
Passed by Congress June 13, 1866. Ratified July 9, 1868
“4. The validity of the public debt of the United States, authorized by law, including debts incurred for payment of pensions and bounties for services in suppressing insurrection or rebellion, shall not be questioned.”

County jurisdiction is the responsibility of the people. Locating the Treasonous Frauds is as simple as following their money to their locations.

Forgotten but not lost, the law of the land relocates to the locals.

Caveat Emptor