Hidden Discovery I
by Joe Kelley
6-4-2022

When Language Is Used to Deceive You: How Doublespeak Distorts Reality and Corrupts Thought (1989)

“Double Speak is language designed to evade responsibility...”

The speaker demonstrates how to use doublespeak (his word) to hide from the discovery of the facts that matter, in any case, warranting a lawful, legal, moral cause for defense at law, validated, and prosecuted in a County Criminal Court of Law.

It cannot be discovered that it is Treasonous Fraud while we are told to call it doublespeak instead of calling it what it is in fact.

If no one discovers a treasonous fraud perpetrating treasonous fraud, no one can then have that discovery of that treasonous fraud validated according to precedent, and statute, and then have that named defendant prosecuted. If found guilty by independent trial jurors who then demand that their sentence for remedy be executed by officers of the government charged with that duty by those jurors, then the government is ordered to step in, ordered by representatives of the people, those trial jurors in command of all criminal jurisdiction in their respective federated republics known as Counties.

How many people are capable of discovering this hidden example of someone caught Red-Handed perpetrating treasonous fraud?

None?

The speaker, the interviewer, and how many people who view this message are ignoring the facts that matter in this treasonous fraud case?

Everyone?

The media product linked above constitutes inculpatory evidence that documents an ongoing case of Treasonous Fraud.

If we are all not evil now, then soon enough by way of Treasonous Fraud.

“To falsify information by a judge is indisputably fraud. ". . [J]f it looks like a duck, walks like a duck and quacks like a duck, it must be a duck.., even if it is holding a piece of paper that says it is a chicken" Wild v. Fregein Construction, 68 P.3rd 855, 2003

Treasonous frauds will look you in the eye emboldened with the desire to make a fool of you because treasonous frauds document forensic precedent of their ability to get away with their criminal acts. The long list of their ongoing crimes reads like a Treasonous Fraud Law Library collection.

“...language that pretends to communicate, but really doesn’t, it is language designed to mislead while pretending not to...” William Lutz

Someone responsible for perpetrating Treasonous Fraud, like those words quoted from that Media Product linked above, can only get away with that serious crime when no one anywhere holds to an accurate accounting, facts that matter in that case, for if someone does discover those facts, validate those facts, and prosecute those facts, then for that individual these Treasonous Frauds cannot get away with their intended injury to the one who has discovered, validated, and prosecuted this case of Treasonous Fraud.

Why not share those discoveries, those validations, and allow more people the opportunity to prosecute those Treasonous Frauds so that those Treasonous Frauds no longer have any power to deceive anyone?

Where is the law, really?

It looks like a case of Treasonous Fraud, it walks like a case of Treasonous Fraud, it quacks like a case of Treasonous Fraud, but it has not moved to a Public Notice for The People to then know exactly what constitutes a Treasonous Fraud.

Why call it doublespeak if it is in fact a case of Treasonous Fraud?

"[T]ampering with the administration of justice as indisputably shown here involves far more than injury to a single litigant. It is a wrong against the institutions set up to protect and safeguard the public, institutions In which fraud cannot complacently be tolerated consistent with the good order of society" Hazel-Atlas Glass Co. v. Hartford Empire Co., 322 US 238, 1944

It is clearly not doublespeak when it clearly does mislead, misdirect, and render defensive forces impotent in the capacity of holding to an accurate account those who perpetrate Treasonous Fraud. If it is a subset of Treasonous Fraud, a branch from the root, a fig leaf of doublespeak, then why not mention the root of it?

“I had to stop writing the chapter on government doublespeak, it was going to take over the whole book.” William Lutz

Those who perpetrate fraud from a defensive government office position of government authority are guilty of Treasonous Fraud, so calling it doublespeak instead of Treasonous Fraud can BAR the gate to accurate accountability of the Treasonous Fraud lawfully, legally, morally, and by precedent, statute, and law.

"There is no question of the general doctrine that fraud vitiates the most solemn contracts, documents, and even judgments" United States v. Throckmorton, 98 US 61, 1878.

Injuries caused by criminals upon their victims include injuries caused by criminals to fellow criminals as well as criminals causing injuries to people who are not found guilty of any crime ever.

If no one is ever found guilty of Treasonous Fraud, then we are all innocent, and then why would we need to spend so much on government?

“How long has the government been using doublespeak?”
Brian Lamb

“Ahhhh, [dodge the question, or seize the opportunity to add to the already overpowering pile of Treasonous Fraud?] I think of government as the third oldest profession.”
William Lutz

If it is Treasonous Frauds ever-busy perpetrating Treasonous Fraud, why call it government?

Treasonous Fraud Discovery ONE.

Discovery is no longer hidden, it is an actual function of government.

How about a viable contender to the throne?

Government Equals Organized Crime formed into a Treasonous Fraud form, founded upon Treasonous Fraud by Treasonous Frauds, so as to make slaves out of everyone all the time, since no one is then capable of holding any Treasonous Frauds to an accurate accounting of the facts that matter in any case of Treasonous Fraud, since Treasonous Fraud cannot exist as claimed by Treasonous Frauds who are ordered never to even mention the words Treasonous Fraud in any official Treasonous Fraud Media.

But Joe, it is much easier to just blame a phantom such as a Legal Fiction Entity that does not really exist in any form other than Treasonous Fraud.

There is no State, it is fictional, it is at best a mere convenience of language to be able to speak of a number of people who by their shared characteristics those people belong in a fictional group. The use of language to create and use a Legal Fiction is merely a method of transferring information about a group of people without having to list each name of each member of the group being held to an accurate accounting of the facts that matter concerning those people in that group.

Government = Organized Crime = Official Treasonous Fraud Doublespeak

The hidden message is not hidden, it is as easy to see once the light in the darkroom is turned on by those who prefer not to be kept in the dark by Treasonous Frauds.

“...ritualistic use of language...” William Lutz

Cult members all agree to drink liberally from the Nationalist Bureaucratic Cool-Aid, otherwise, none of the fellow Nationalist Bureaucrats will FUND a fellow Nationalist Bureaucrat.

"Machiavelli's outlook was darkly pessimistic; the one element of St Augustine's thought which he wholeheartedly endorsed was the idea of original sin. As he puts it starkly in the same chapter 18 of The Prince, men are bad. This means that to deal with them as if they were good, honourable or trustworthy is to court disaster. In the Discourses (I,3) the point is repeated: 'all men are bad and are ever ready to display their malignity'. This must be the initial premise of those who play to found a republic. The business of politics is to try and salvage something positive from this unpromising conglomerate, and the aim of the state is to check those anarchic drives which are a constant threat to the common good. This is where The Prince fits into the spectrum of his wider thought: while a republic may be his preferred form of social organization, the crucial business of founding or restoring a state can only be performed by one exceptional individual."
Introduction in my copy of The Prince by Niccolo Machiavelli

If it walks like a malevolent criminal, talks like a malevolent criminal, and innocent bodies pile up as fast as the piles of the ritualistic use of language knowable as Treasonous Fraud, then is it the government, or is it instead of the government, it is, in reality, a Cult of Personality hiding behind a false flag and false front?

Why would anyone care to know the facts that matter in this case when we are all told that Mankind is all bad, and only the worst examples of bad, bad, mankind own everyone else, so be happy, and get back to work to pay off your National Debt?

Love it or leave it, baby.

“That the fundamental linkage between the pathology of the state and the individual was the individual’s propensity to deceive him or herself and to fail to act in an authentic manner, in a genuine and authentic manner, and to become as a consequence either nihilistic, let’s say, because of the incremental weakening of character that’s part and parcel of adopting an inauthentic mode of being or to turn to ideological and totalitarian solutions as an alternative to living appropriately and with responsibility as an individual.”
Jordan Peterson, Lecture, Existentialism via Solzhenitsyn

Actual common law precedent, statute, and patriotic duty to mankind afford each individual the responsibility to discover, validate, and prosecute all enemies foreign and domestic so as to increase both individual and collective defensive powers to a State of power greater than all the enemies of mankind combined.

But YOU are told otherwise and so YOU are neither responsible, accountable, or bound by a duty to defend yourself, let alone mankind, while you FUND the worst evil and the lesser evils under the collective Infantile State knowable as Nationalism.

Caveat Emptor