slug.com slug.com
4 0

Another fine video to share. Goes over experiments looking at xenophilia and how the "left wing" just trades care for an ingroup (a natural response) for care for an outgroups (an unnatural response). These are high fashion ideals that those that can afford to have and are protected from the consequences that these ideals hold. The upper middle class scum who wants you replaced with a more violent and less intelligent other does so due to massive amounts of brain washing and low chance of actually interacting with these terrible replacments on a daily basis. It takes a lot of effort to make people hate there own kind and love another, but our oligarchs feel that it's worth it.

Slugo 6 May 23
Share
You must be a member of this group before commenting. Join Group

Be part of the movement!

Welcome to the community for those who value free speech, evidence and civil discourse.

Create your free account

4 comments

Feel free to reply to any comment by clicking the "Reply" button.

0

False Problem/False Solution with "Universal Health Care."

Here again I will quote for cause. Before doing so the obvious false problem is to claim that "government" has jurisdiction over medical CARE. That is clearly a move from defensive government power (legitimate government power) and a move to offensive criminal power claimed to be "government" power.

False Problem: people get sick and therefore people must be forced to CARE for sick people.

That is also the False Solution, there is no switch on the Trolly Tracks.

See here:

Reclaiming the American Revolution: The Kentucky and Virginia Resolutions and Their Legacy
by William Watkins

"Second, federalism permits the states to operate as laboratories of democracy-to experiment with various policies and Programs. For example, if Tennessee wanted to provide a state-run health system for its citizens, the other 49 states could observe the effects of this venture on Tennessee's economy, the quality of care provided, and the overall cost of health care. If the plan proved to be efficacious other states might choose to emulate it, or adopt a plan taking into account any problems surfacing in Tennessee. If the plan proved to be a disastrous intervention, the other 49 could decide to leave the provision of medical care to the private sector. With national plans and programs, the national officials simply roll the dice for all 284 million people of the United States and hope they get things right.

"Experimentation in policymaking also encourages a healthy competition among units of government and allows the people to vote with their feet should they find a law of policy detrimental to their interests. Using again the state-run health system as an example, if a citizen of Tennessee was unhappy with Tennessee's meddling with the provisions of health care, the citizen could move to a neighboring state. Reallocation to a state like North Carolina, with a similar culture and climate, would not be a dramatic shift and would be a viable option. Moreover, if enough citizens exercised this option, Tennessee would be pressured to abandon its foray into socialized medicine, or else lose much of its tax base. To escape a national health system, a citizen would have to emigrate to a foreign country, an option far less appealing and less likely to be exercised than moving to a neighboring state. Without competition from other units of government, the national government would have much less incentive than Tennessee would to modify the objectionable policy. Clearly, the absence of experimentation and competition hampers the creation of effective programs and makes the modification of failed national programs less likely."

I won't listen to the video any longer, I can't help but comment, and that may be unwarranted, or unwelcome.

0

False Problem/False Solution with the "Labor Problem"

I will quote for this one. The False Problem is "they are taking our jobs." So the false solution is once again restrict the free movement of people.

The actual Labor Problem is explained here:

"First in the importance of its evil influence they considered the money monopoly, which consists of the privilege given by the government to certain individuals, or to individuals holding certain kinds of property, of issuing the circulating medium, a privilege which is now enforced in this country by a national tax of ten per cent., upon all other persons who attempt to furnish a circulating medium, and by State laws making it a criminal offense to issue notes as currency.

"It is claimed that the holders of this privilege control the rate of interest, the rate of rent of houses and buildings, and the prices of goods, – the first directly, and the second and third indirectly. For, say Proudhon and Warren, if the business of banking were made free to all, more and more persons would enter into it until the competition should become sharp enough to reduce the price of lending money to the labor cost, which statistics show to be less than three-fourths of once per cent. In that case the thousands of people who are now deterred from going into business by the ruinously high rates which they must pay for capital with which to start and carry on business will find their difficulties removed. If they have property which they do not desire to convert into money by sale, a bank will take it as collateral for a loan of a certain proportion of its market value at less than one per cent. discount.

"If they have no property, but are industrious, honest, and capable, they will generally be able to get their individual notes endorsed by a sufficient number of known and solvent parties; and on such business paper they will be able to get a loan at a bank on similarly favorable terms. Thus interest will fall at a blow. The banks will really not be lending capital at all, but will be doing business on the capital of their customers, the business consisting in an exchange of the known and widely available credits of the banks for the unknown and unavailable, but equality good, credits of the customers and a charge therefor of less than one per cent., not as interest for the use of capital, but as pay for the labor of running the banks.

"This facility of acquiring capital will give an unheard of impetus to business, and consequently create an unprecedented demand for labor, – a demand which will always be in excess of the supply, directly to the contrary of the present condition of the labor market. Then will be seen an exemplification of the words of Richard Cobden that, when two laborers are after one employer, wages fall, but when two employers are after one laborer, wages rise. Labor will then be in a position to dictate its wages, and will thus secure its natural wage, its entire product.

"Thus the same blow that strikes interest down will send wages up. But this is not all. Down will go profits also. For merchants, instead of buying at high prices on credit, will borrow money of the banks at less than one per cent., buy at low prices for cash, and correspondingly reduce the prices of their goods to their customers. And with the rest will go house-rent. For no one who can borrow capital at one per cent. with which to build a house of his own will consent to pay rent to a landlord at a higher rate than that. Such is the vast claim made by Proudhon and Warren as to the results of the simple abolition of the money monopoly.

Benjamin Tucker, State Socialism and Anarchism:
HOW FAR THEY AGREE, AND WHEREIN THEY DIFFER (1888)

0

Time 3:00 or so....

"People destroy the environment."

Why are people (specific people with names) so ready to punish collectively? If a number of people (all with names) are dumping raw toxins upriver from your home on the river, do you look in the mirror and blame yourself for dumping raw toxins upriver? This is an example of a False Problem/False Solution.

False Problem: People destroy the environment.
False Solution: Restrict the free movement of people (build walls in mind or in fact)

@Slugo

"The only argument is if they truly changed their minds on this stuff or not."

I don't buy into a lot of stuff because I check a lot of stuff. People alive today are subjected to a false narrative from birth to their death. Many succumb to that assault on their power to think. This is not an accident.

I suggest the following:

0

I really stumbled onto this one, almost letting it go. Fortunately I get to view the messages, rather than failing to do so, and thanks for posting it.

Before I finish watching the messages I want to make a quick comment concerning the very clear differences between an actual Trolly Problem and a Counterfeit Trolly Problem (a false set of choices based upon a false diagnosis of a problem).

The major false problem is the one so eloquently restated in the introduction to my copy of The Prince by Machiavelli. Rather than quote that eloquent statement I will cut it down to base principles.

False Problem/False Solution

Men are bad. It takes me and my gang to force men to be good.

Now that can be seen as a false Trolly Problem.

Create a Criminal Gang to RULE everyone because failing to do so will allow a "less" Criminal Gang to RULE everyone. That is the lesser of two evils False Problem/False Solution.

Rather than a few people on one track (one path after the Y in the tracks with the controller on the track path switch, switching the Trolly to go on one or the other path) there are instead billions of people for many generations mowed down by the STATE Trolly as it is allowed to travel down the despotic, tyrannical, path, and the other path (not chosen) is the freedom in liberty path made so with (voluntary) rule of law, such as the common law, which is the Ancient Law, also known as the law of the land.

So....

The False Problem is expressed as a Greater or Lesser Evil non-choice (no choice to defend against all evil), and the people in power use that deception to keep the Trolly going down the despotic path, or if the Trolly somehow got on the other path (1774 to 1789 in America for example), then the False Problem is used to get the Trolly back on the despotic path that mows down everyone eventually, even the despots.

The False Solution Choices are Despotic Path A (greater evil claimed) or Despotic Path B, which is claimed to be the lesser evil path.

The idea never occurs to someone to stop the Trolly and find out why people are insisting on mowing down either Group A or Group B.

Write Comment

Recent Visitors 5

Photos

Posted by Josf-KelleyOrigins of Adaptive Creativity for Life to Prosper Eternally by Joe Kelley 12-13-2021 I profess to know that the following is true, to the best of my current knowledge.

Posted by Josf-KelleyKyle is not an aberration.

Posted by Josf-KelleyAlong with the Persecution of Defense is the Persecution of Deterrence.

  • Top tags#government #USA #truth #world #evidence #rights #money #freedom #video #reason #god #crime #children #evil #death #laws #media #justice #society #TheTruth #federal #hope #military #hell #vote #Canada #book #liberty #China #biden #Police #violence #population #democrats #created #moral #Constitution #republicans #politics #murder #community #communist #kids #fear #earth #videos #liberal #religion #Present #slaves ...

    Members 14Top

    Moderator