Please consider the concept of censorship in the following context, which is a quote from Alexandr I. Solzhenitsyn, from his 1970 Nobel Prize Lecture:
"And on top of this we are threatened by destruction in the fact that the physically compressed, strained world is not allowed to blend spiritually; the molecules of knowledge and sympathy are not allowed to jump over from one half to the other. This presents a rampant danger: THE SUPPRESSION OF INFORMATION between the parts of the planet. Contemporary science knows that suppression of information leads to entropy and total destruction. Suppression of information renders international signatures and agreements illusory; within a muffled zone it costs nothing to reinterpret any agreement, even simpler – to forget it, as though it had never really existed. (Orwell understood this supremely.) A muffled zone is, as it were, populated not by inhabitants of the Earth, but by an expeditionary corps from Mars; the people know nothing intelligent about the rest of the Earth and are prepared to go and trample it down in the holy conviction that they come as “liberators”."
Consider also that the Criminal Powers (the worst dominate without law power) MUST - as a rule - destroy competition, by any means, such as:
The power to defend grows ever weaker as the information that empowers the victims is distorted, censored, twisted, and otherwise not able to connect - intact - to the deceived.
Also from Solzhenitsyn is the following vital dynamic:
"But let us not forget that violence does not live alone and is not capable of living alone: it is necessarily interwoven with falsehood. Between them lies the most intimate, the deepest of natural bonds. Violence finds its only refuge in falsehood, falsehood its only support in violence. Any man who has once acclaimed violence as his METHOD must inexorably choose falsehood as his PRINCIPLE. At its birth violence acts openly and even with pride. But no sooner does it become strong, firmly established, than it senses the rarefaction of the air around it and it cannot continue to exist without descending into a fog of lies, clothing them in sweet talk. It does not always, not necessarily, openly throttle the throat, more often it demands from its subjects only an oath of allegiance to falsehood, only complicity in falsehood."
Of course there is a willful effort to keep defensive information from the victims, if that goal is not reached there is a higher risk associated with the criminal goal of enslavement. See: Stockholm Syndrome