Congress Challenging the Election Results & Electors? Tom Fitton & Mo Brooks Weigh In!
Each individual has the power at law to set in motion a trial for an accused fraud, anyone, anyplace, anytime, or it isn't law. Excluding victims from a just remedy - as a rule - is a crime with many names, nonfeasance, misfeasance, malfeasance, misprision of justice, misprision of treason, or plain old treason. This may be news to some people, and that is a fact that matters.
0
Be part of the movement!
Welcome to the community for those who value free speech, evidence and civil discourse.Create your free account
1 comment
Feel free to reply to any comment by clicking the "Reply" button.3 U.S. Code § 15 - Counting electoral votes in Congress
"Congress shall be in session on the sixth day of January succeeding every meeting of the electors. The Senate and House of Representatives shall meet in the Hall of the House of Representatives at the hour of 1 o’clock in the afternoon on that day, and the President of the Senate shall be their presiding officer. Two tellers shall be previously appointed on the part of the Senate and two on the part of the House of Representatives, to whom shall be handed, as they are opened by the President of the Senate, all the certificates and papers purporting to be certificates of the electoral votes, which certificates and papers shall be opened, presented, and acted upon in the alphabetical order of the States, beginning with the letter A; and said tellers, having then read the same in the presence and hearing of the two Houses, shall make a list of the votes as they shall appear from the said certificates; and the votes having been ascertained and counted according to the rules in this subchapter provided, the result of the same shall be delivered to the President of the Senate, who shall thereupon announce the state of the vote, which announcement shall be deemed a sufficient declaration of the persons, if any, elected President and Vice President of the United States, and, together with a list of the votes, be entered on the Journals of the two Houses. Upon such reading of any such certificate or paper, the President of the Senate shall call for objections, if any. Every objection shall be made in writing, and shall state clearly and concisely, and without argument, the ground thereof, and shall be signed by at least one Senator and one Member of the House of Representatives before the same shall be received. When all objections so made to any vote or paper from a State shall have been received and read, the Senate shall thereupon withdraw, and such objections shall be submitted to the Senate for its decision; and the Speaker of the House of Representatives shall, in like manner, submit such objections to the House of Representatives for its decision; and no electoral vote or votes from any State which shall have been regularly given by electors whose appointment has been lawfully certified to according to section 6 of this title from which but one return has been received shall be rejected, but the two Houses concurrently may reject the vote or votes when they agree that such vote or votes have not been so regularly given by electors whose appointment has been so certified. If more than one return or paper purporting to be a return from a State shall have been received by the President of the Senate, those votes, and those only, shall be counted which shall have been regularly given by the electors who are shown by the determination mentioned in section 5 of this title to have been appointed, if the determination in said section provided for shall have been made, or by such successors or substitutes, in case of a vacancy in the board of electors so ascertained, as have been appointed to fill such vacancy in the mode provided by the laws of the State; but in case there shall arise the question which of two or more of such State authorities determining what electors have been appointed, as mentioned in section 5 of this title, is the lawful tribunal of such State, the votes regularly given of those electors, and those only, of such State shall be counted whose title as electors the two Houses, acting separately, shall concurrently decide is supported by the decision of such State so authorized by its law; and in such case of more than one return or paper purporting to be a return from a State, if there shall have been no such determination of the question in the State aforesaid, then those votes, and those only, shall be counted which the two Houses shall concurrently decide were cast by lawful electors appointed in accordance with the laws of the State, unless the two Houses, acting separately, shall concurrently decide such votes not to be the lawful votes of the legally appointed electors of such State. But if the two Houses shall disagree in respect of the counting of such votes, then, and in that case, the votes of the electors whose appointment shall have been certified by the executive of the State, under the seal thereof, shall be counted. When the two Houses have voted, they shall immediately again meet, and the presiding officer shall then announce the decision of the questions submitted. No votes or papers from any other State shall be acted upon until the objections previously made to the votes or papers from any State shall have been finally disposed of."
3 U.S. Code § 17.Same; limit of debate in each House
"When the two Houses separate to decide upon an objection that may have been made to the counting of any electoral vote or votes from any State, or other question arising in the matter, each Senator and Representative may speak to such objection or question five minutes, and not more than once; but after such debate shall have lasted two hours it shall be the duty of the presiding officer of each House to put the main question without further debate."
Josf-Kelley
Level 8
Dec 28, 2020
0
Key point:
"But if the two Houses shall disagree in respect of the counting of such votes, then, and in that case, the votes of the electors whose appointment shall have been certified by the executive of the State, under the seal thereof, shall be counted."
So...
If Pence receives 2 sets of votes from Pennsylvania, Georgia, Michigan, Wisconsin, Arizona, Nevada, and New Mexico, he can decide to open only Trump Electors, making an executive decision on the spot, a very bold move, and the election is recorded by him as a Trump victory.
Or...
Pence opens all envelopes (doing as told), and each State with dueling electors are over-ruled by both The House and Senate by whatever process they agree to select either Trump or Biden, in each individual State by State Case, or strictly along FACTION ( party ) lines.
If the States actually do pass The Hot Potato to Pence with dueling electors, and if Pence passed The Hot Potato to Congress, and Congress does not agree (House and Senate "majority rules" ), then The Hot Potato goes back to the "executive of the State," which would presumably be the Governors who then "dispose of" The Hot Potato.
All it would take in common law is one trial according to the common law to start the process of draining the FUCKING SWAMP.
12 Jurors, picked by random, to adjudicate both fact and law in the case of election fraud, would have to deal with all the evidence of Election Fraud presented by the prosecutor (private or otherwise) and all the refusals to admit to any evidence on the defendant's non-argument side.
Deliberate adjudication of the facts that matter in the case by 12 jurors - as a rule - is preferable to the mind warped biased edict of one judge who is a member of one of the contentious factions.
Notes on the State of Virginia
by Thomas Jefferson
1781
"The state is divided into counties. In every county are appointed magistrates, called justices of the peace, usually from eight to thirty or forty in number, in proportion to the size of the county, of the most discreet and honest inhabitants. They are nominated by their fellows, but commissioned by the governor, and act without reward. These magistrates have jurisdiction both criminal and civil. If the question before them be a question of law only, they decide on it themselves: but if it be of fact, or of fact and law combined, it must be referred to a jury. In the latter case, of a combination of law and fact, it is usual for the jurors to decide the fact, and to refer the law arising on it to the decision of the judges. But this division of the subject lies with their discretion only. And if the question relate to any point of public liberty, or if it be one of those in which the judges may be suspected of bias, the jury undertake to decide both law and fact. If they be mistaken, a decision against right, which is casual only, is less dangerous to the state, and less afflicting to the loser, than one which makes part of a regular and uniform system. In truth, it is better to toss up cross and pile in a cause, than to refer it to a judge whose mind is warped by any motive whatever, in that particular case. But the common sense of twelve honest men gives still a better chance of just decision, than the hazard of cross and pile. These judges execute their process by the sheriff or coroner of the county, or by constables of their own appointment. If any free person commit an offence against the commonwealth, if it be below the degree of felony, he is bound by a justice to appear before their court, to answer it on indictment or information. If it amount to felony, he is committed to jail, a court of these justices is called; if they on examination think him guilty, they send him to the jail of the general court, before which court he is to be tried first by a grand jury of 24, of whom 13 must concur in opinion: if they find him guilty, he is then tried by a jury of 12 men of the county where the offence was committed, and by their verdict, which must be unanimous, he is acquitted or condemned without appeal."
Recent Visitors 6
Photos 19 More
Posted by Josf-KelleyWanted for Treason That is all for lack of intelligence and moral conscience.
Posted by Josf-KelleyBorrowed from another IDW post is the pictured meme.
Posted by Josf-KelleyReal Reality A few people have purchased the exclusive power to add zeros to their Bank account balance, and they accomplish this feat by borrowing their spending from anyone who can produce ...
Posted by HeresiarchWhy you should close Social Media accounts you no longer use. (I shut down my LinkedIn account immediately)
Posted by HeresiarchI taught my daughter to shoot at ten years old. Now she's passing on the lessons she learned.
Posted by HeresiarchIt's taken us years to rehabilitate the soil on our Better Than Organic farmlet.
Posted by Josf-KelleyThat is a complex process viewed simplistically in two directions that appear, in simple form, to be opposites.
Posted by Josf-KelleyThe level of brainwashing or mind control, or spirit control, or body control, or behavior control is demonstrably on a sub-conscious level and it runs very deep.
Posted by HeresiarchHow do you sacrifice children?
Posted by HeresiarchHow's that Police State workin' out for y'all?
Posted by Josf-KelleyFrom a source:
Posted by Josf-KelleyTrump says Pence can reject criminal votes.
Posted by Josf-KelleyFrom another IDW post: Roadmap to re-inauguration:
Posted by Josf-KelleyAt a Pennsylvania State Hearing, widespread voter and election fraud is reported by witness testimony.
Posted by Josf-KelleyThe following link is immediately censored from Facebook, as I press the enter button, a warning page loads.
Posted by Josf-KelleyI was banished (for speaking the truth to power) from Culture War (IDW topics) and occasionally I am presented with posts in my feed that lead to that exclusive group, so I can't enter, and a I can't ...