Treasonous Money Laundering VII

Power flowing from all those who produce anything worth stealing, flowing to the treasonous criminal counterfeiters, has been measured quantitatively in units of Purchasing Power. That transfer of power has been ongoing in America for 232 years. Each successive generation passed onto the next generation the routine transfer of power as if nothing existed on this planet capable of overpowering the treasonous criminal counterfeiters. This fact places each reader capable of the discernment of the facts that matter in the case before their own reflection as if having to place themselves into their own shoes, to be thereby looking internally, looking for answers as to why people allow such a simple power transfer, by simple means, to happen on their watch. People are found in the mirror. What do you see?

Why pay into such an obvious scam in the first place? Why pay into such an obvious scam during your entire life? Why pay into such an obvious scam knowing that each payment increases the power of the treasonous criminal counterfeiters while each payment decreases the power to defend against the treasonous criminal counterfeiters? Why pass this routine power transfer onto the next generation as if there was never, is nothing now, and can never be a solution to this power transfer problem?

That is all part of the power transfer problem: deception. The power to learn from history was immediately attacked as warned by Thomas Paine with his "To the citizens of the United States", November 15, 1802, Letter:

"But a faction, acting in disguise, was rising in America; they had lost sight of first principles. They were beginning to contemplate government as a profitable monopoly, and the people as hereditary property. It is, therefore, no wonder that the "Rights of Man" was attacked by that faction, and its author continually abused. But let them go on; give them rope enough and they will put an end to their own insignificance. There is too much common sense and independence in America to be long the dupe of any faction, foreign or domestic.
But, in the midst of the freedom we enjoy, the licentiousness of the papers called Federal (and I know not why they are called so, for they are in their principles anti-federal and despotic), is a dishonor to the character of the country, and an injury to its reputation and importance abroad. They represent the whole people of America as destitute of public principle and private manners.”

Bit by bit, slice by slice, the power to defend each other is hacked off by the malevolent forces of treasonous government counterfeiters, and they know the truth of the saying: the truth with set you free. The opposite is also known to be true: deception will enslave you. Such simple truth, and yet no one knows it today? Can that be true? How does one process such a terrifying problem as the problem before you, whereby the facts reported prove beyond reasonable doubt that the criminals counterfeited the government in 1789, turning defense into offense, enslaving all people in America from that date forward until this date as I type? Can you process that information, and if so, how?

Those who have been following along in this series have the inculpatory evidence before them, for them to adjudicate. A woman sets herself free in 1781, and does so by the process that also inspires publications such as a Declaration of Independence, and a Bill of Rights. Written right into a Bill of Rights are references to that same process, the process that sets people free, the accurate accounting of the facts that matter in the case. These are the facts, placed before you, the absent jurors. You, the absent jurors, have all been told that you have no power, not as private prosecutors, not as independent grand jurors, and not as independent trial jurors, and instead of that powerful information that sets people free, the lies you are told inspire blind obedience on your part, on the part of all people alive today, and people will teach their children those lies.

Move along in the Thought Experiment, go from one date in history, apply accurate accountability in one example court case in a Court of Law, and place on the stand, before you the jury, an accused, and place any member of the treasonous criminal cabal on the stand, on that date. Then move forward. While moving forward from that date add up the power transfers as those power transfers are not happening because defenders defend themselves the common way, the lawful way, the legal way, the moral way, the peaceful way, the accurate accounting due process of law way. The way that deters crime by making crime no longer profitable and thereby discouraging anyone from choosing a path that is clearly not in their best interest.

What is the interest on the National Debt alone, and who is interested in increasing that interesting National Interest? The starting date of the Thought Experiment can start with 1781, the year a woman took a kidnapper to court, and this woman set herself free from a criminal who had enslaved this woman. How many slaves wanted to be slaves, and therefore they were convinced that they were slaves, as they thought they should be slaves? Are you looking in the mirror? How many kidnap victims knew they were victims of treasonous criminals whose crimes were cause to set in motion due process of law in defense of the innocent from the guilty? One did, she was not a slave. She proved it. Why did so many people then, as now, accept their fate as chattel, as property owned by some one or some thing other than the being in your own shoes, the being you see when you look in the mirror? If the one in the mirror does not own the one in the mirror, who claims to own that image in that mirror? One spreads the word to another, and like wild fire the news spreads to every corner of the globe, and each kidnap victim is afforded their day in court. Is the Thought Experiment worth the effort?

Obviously the criminals who formed the cabal nipped that court case in the bud, replacing due process of law with a tried and true counterfeit. Successful, powerful, criminals know better than to allow their victims to know the truth. That has already been proven, it is routine. The criminals who counterfeit government, counterfeit due process of law, as a matter of record. But the slaves, who are convinced that they are indebted to their masters, are hopelessly defenseless in their state of ignorance. Is that true? Did you see the court case proving beyond reasonable doubt that the treasonous money launderers add purchasing power to their bank accounts, routinely, by bookkeeping entry? Does that fact matter, or is that just another useless bit of information that requires some authorized license holder to adjudicate the matter officially, while you get back to work?

Starting with 1781, people share knowledge of the facts that matter in the case where a women sets herself free, using due process of law, and the Thought Experiment considers the possibility that from then on all slaves free themselves from all criminal enslavement by every treasonous criminal who sets out to enslave people, owning people as if people were farm animals. How many lives are counted up in that way? From 1781 until today, no more slavery, because people are not farm animals, and people won’t listen to those criminals who make those false claims. People help defend each other by holding people to account for the facts that matter in each case where each criminal intends to harm each victim, especially when the criminal is already extremely powerful, having enslaved a whole Nation such as England. Who is allowed to declare their independence from criminals who think that people are their farm animals, to dispose of, and consume, at their exclusive pleasure? Do you ask the criminals for permission to be free from deception?

What planet am I on?