From a Post on IDW I cut and paste the following link:

[rumble.com]

Col. John Mills - The Deep State, Up Close and Personal
The Professor's Record with David K. Clements

I am not done digesting this, but my comments are offered to piece things together some.

Mills answers a question about defense. The answer is that the responsibility and accountability for failing to defend Election Integrity was Barr's as Attorney General.

Mills confesses that both political parties are working together for power and profit. This is not news:

To the citizens of the United States by Thomas Paine
November 15, 1802
"But a faction, acting in disguise, was rising in America; they had lost sight of first principles. They were beginning to contemplate government as a profitable monopoly, and the people as hereditary property."

Clements comments on the commonalities of both parties, where both parties do not disturb The Military Industrial Complex, nor Federal Reserve Policy.

Mills then reports that he was targeted and an example of proof that he was targeted was IRS audits.

My comment here, with that being said above, that both parties do not disturb Judicial Policy.

Mills spoke about his witness to gross malfeasance, and nothing was said about turning the wheels of justice based upon that clear and present danger to life, liberty, property, the pursuit of happiness, and the means to defend all.

Got that?

Those running the Nation State agree that they can do anything they want, including gross malfeasance, and nothing will be done to defend against gross malfeasance. Why would anyone worry about someone perpetrating mere gross malfeasance?

But what happens if the IRS catches someone failing to pay their membership fee?

There is no Central Bank if there is no enforcement of a particular form of money, and there is no enforcement of a particular form of money without a membership fee demanded and enforced with a particular form of money.

Treasonous Central Banking Frauds can add zeros to their bank account at will, this isn't subject to argumentation.

"Plaintiff admitted that it, in combination with the Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis, which are for all practical purposes, because of there interlocking activity and practices, and both being Banking Institutions Incorporated under the Laws of the United States, are in the Law to be treated as one and the same Bank, did create the entire 14,000.00 in money or credit upon its own books by bookkeeping entry. That this was the Consideration used to support the Note dated May 8, 1964 and the Mortgage of the same date. The money and credit first came into existence when they created it. Mr. Morgan admitted that no United States Law or Statute existed which gave him the right to do this. A lawful consideration must exist and be tendered to support the Note. See Anheuser-Bush Brewing co. V. Emma Mason, 44 Minn. 318. The Jury found there was no lawful consideration and I agree. Only God can create something of value out of nothing."
STATE OF MINNESOTA
COUNTY OF SCOTT
First National Bank of Montgomery, Plaintiff
vs
Jerome Daly, Defendant.
December 9, 1968

Since Treasonous Central Banking Frauds can add zeros to their account, why would they need to enforce a membership fee through the Fascist/Communist Organ known euphemistically as The Internal Revenue Service?

What do all the swap creatures fear most?

IRS Audits?

And that is because the Justice System ignores torture, terror, murder, mass murder, and treason among themselves, but don't ever get caught failing to pay your membership fee?