How does one or many measure the consequences, including dire costs, to humanity when a few psychopaths are allowed to dumb down their targeted victims?

Total disregard for the rules that claim to authorize authority.

The Top shows total disregard for the rules that claim to authorize authority at law.

Psychopaths at the Top set the stage for their slaves as to how slaves are allowed to act, since psychopaths at the Top totally disregard the rules that they claim to authorize their authority at law.

When some slaves take it upon themselves to abide by the rules that authorize authority at law the psychopaths at the Top make good use of the opportunity to exploit that which they see as a weakness, as their slaves dare to abide by the rules that authorize authority at law.

Some of the slaves follow the rules demonstrated by the psychopaths at the Top as the psychopaths at the Top demonstrate how to exploit opportunity made by them as weakened slaves are weakened when they follow the rules that authorize authority at law.

Make sure that the slaves are confused as to which side they are on, and while they attempt to face clear and present dangers to life, liberty, property, the pursuit of happiness, and the means to defend all, opportunity arises for malevolence. Of all the people from Top to Bottom, people will include those who totally disregard the rules that authorize authority at law, given opportunity. Among those who abide by the rules that authorize authority at law are those that are confused by the confusion put in place by the malevolent criminals at the Top. That confusion affords every criminal the required opportunity to not simply perpetrate crime, but the means to get away with crime, to then move from one victim to another, to another, until everyone is either a fellow criminal, or all are dead.

The defense of all, expediently, efficiently, requires accuracy of data concerning clear and present dangers to the life of all.

What does it say in the rules that authorize authority at law, concerning which people, in which places, are authorized to determine the difference between a valid accusation of a crime, worthy of the expense of prosecution at law, and an invalid accusation of a crime, unworthy of the expense of prosecution at law?

V - Provisons concerning prosecution
“No person shall be held to answer for a capital, or otherwise infamous crime, unless on a presentment or indictment of a Grand Jury, except in cases arising in the land or naval forces, or in the militia, when in actual service in time of war or public danger; nor shall any person be subject for the same offense to be twice put in jeopardy of life or limb; nor shall be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself, nor be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor shall private property be taken for public use without just compensation.”

infringement of natural rights, such as the right of self defense by means that afford the defender actual defense, which would be a power greater than the offender, is a naturally obvious crime, except when victims are prepared well with falsehood, weakened by falsehood, and so powerless in defense, that they argue among themselves as to what constitutes natural law, and conversely what constitutes treasonous fraud.

Due process of law is the power to prosecute criminals from Top to Bottom, left to right, so as to then deter people who may see an opportunity to perpetrate a crime upon an innocent victim. Due process of law is the power to close the door on opportunity to perpetrate a crime upon an innocent victim.

Treasonous Fraud, from Top to Bottom, affords the criminals every opportunity to do whatever a criminal wants to do to any victim they please to harm, and get away with it, unless there is an argument among criminals as to which criminal gets to lion’s share of the pleasures that please malevolent psychopaths at the Top.