Treason by Fraud III
by Joe Kelley
3-7-2022

People protect themselves as best they can alone against nature or they fail and they die, and that is natural law at its most basic, private, independent, individual dynamically forming foundational principle.

Live and learn or die trying. 

People face criminal versions of people unnaturally occurring due to a natural process known as mutation, whereby some people are born without reason, without moral conscience, and those are people who have been called criminally insane psychopaths, and other names such as Snake Oil Salesmen, Mob Bosses, Totalitarian Dictators, Despots, Mass Marketers,  Lawyers, Judges, Politicians, and Military Dictators. The colors they wear, the badges, false flags, licenses, and unjustified justifications notwithsanding, they are, in fact, Treasonous Frauds when not shown, in no uncertain terms, and with extreme prejudice, that rioting in the blood of the innocent, for fun and profit, is not tolerated. 

If the label used to label an individual that is connected to a crime scene by some form of evidence is chosen to be something other than a suspect, why would someone, reasonably, logically, morally, lawfully, or legally choose a name other than defendant?

The evidence warranting suspicion is probable cause to act in defense by naming the suspect a defendant on a scheduled court date for the suspect's defense as well as the victims defense before another victim is added to the growing pile of victims. 

Not merely common sense for common people uninjured by Treasonous Fraud, it is the law in fact. 

People defending their private, independent, individual lives from harm done to them by any force that can be seen in advance, seen while the injury is being done, or seen clearly in the present time and place after the injury has occurred factually, are people dependent upon their own, internal, self-accounting, and self-responsible processors, or brains, where the data going into the individual brain is completely dependent upon the individual connected to and processing that data, with no one to blame for errors, omissions, delays, obstructions, ignorance as to facts, mistaken identity, fabricated fictional accounts that lead to further injuries instead of an expedient defense against further harm. Speaking in terms of the lone defender against the lone attacker there is no one else to blame for the failure to defend against the attack other than the victim.

By natural law, the criminal is not going to defend the victim being attacked by the criminal. If that is the infantile state you are in, as you suffer your particular injures done to you by Treasonous Frauds who routinely blame the victims for the crimes they perpetrate upon their victims routinely, then you are evidence that proves the case against Treasonous Fraud. You are the evidence not only because you are ignorant, unnaturally ignorant, but you are the evidence because you are unnaturally stupid and servile, to a point at which you actually believe the lies told by Treasonous Frauds. 

Independent awareness of clear, or unclear, and present, or not yet present, or past dangers, that warrant by probable cause a set of effective actions in defense of those pending injuries, current injuries, or past injuries is, independent awareness is limited to that independent, private, individual facing all threats from every dark place or every well-lit place and time that those threats turn into an injury if defensive measures fail to prevent, avoid, deal with, defend against, discourage, disarm, deter, or otherwise prevent those pending, present, injuries to that one, alone, independent, private, individual depending exclusively upon that single pair of eyes, ears, nostrils, fingertips, feet, legs, and brainpower.

Awareness of natural law is awareness of brutal facts that matter in every case where individuals fail to defend themselves against those many hidden or not as hidden or clearly seen, heard, and felt injuries done to people routinely by nature and by criminals who earn the label criminal because they injure people on purpose for unjustified causes and as often for falsely justified causes that I call Treasonous Fraud.

Having mapped out the facts that matter in natural law applied to individual, private, independent, responsible, and accountable people alone against nature and alone against criminals the map of this natural law terrain can now be moved into the area of Legal Fiction by Treasonous Fraud methods.

One individual alone does not merely face the forces of nature and one criminal roaming this planet in search of defenseless, unaware, weak in mind, body, and spirit victims, where the one defender may not see the past, present, or pending crime scene perpetrated by the one, lone, individual, private, independent, responsible, and accountable criminal attacking from the darkness of night, or the cover of Treasonous Fraud. No, it is not natural, not a natural law, that only one criminal will riot in the blood of one innocent victim one time, and worse by a rapidly accelerating increase in mortal peril to mankind as a species of life, one criminal gathers other criminals up into a snowball rolling down a snow-covered mountain, with fraud, bribes, extortion, robbery, assault, rape, human trafficking, forced labor, torture for false confessions, known in the past as Mass Marketing, False Propaganda, Stockholm Syndrome, Mass Hypnosis, Cognitive Dissonance, Hypernormalization, Manufacturing Consent, Demoralization, Destabilization, and now Mass Formation Psychosis, or my term I choose as Treasonous Fraud. Not only does violence beget violence, by natural laws, but the fact also is that Treasonous Fraud begets Treasonous Frauds, each new one requires ten fold exponentially growing increases in more violence and more falsehoods filling mass graves with innocent, defenseless, humanity, and filling Law Libraries full of those documented falsehoods, that clearly go against the laws of nature and the laws of mankind of, by, and for mankind’s survival from worse to better within the natural laws governing mankind if we can see them, and use those facts that matter to our posterity if we can earn our and their prosperity.

If not the first Treasonous Fraud then why not the worst now, held to account, by law, offered their day in a Court of Law, in any county with lawful jurisdiction, where all the inculpatory and exculpatory evidence is demanded by the trial jurors adjudicating the case, by law, without obstructing the free flow of that necessary data, so as to then begin draining the swamp with actual rule of law due process factually, in time, and not too late for the next victim falling into the arms of our collective tormentors.

If the first Treasonous Fraud, in America for example, was not held to account in 1789, when those criminals stole our common law, why not now?

Who dares to obstruct justice when the people learn the fullness of their private, individual, independent lawful jurisdictional powers as private prosecutors, independent grand jurors, and adjudicating trial jurors in criminal county courts where the worst of the worst Treasonous Frauds rioting in the blood of the innocent Globally are facing their Trial by Jury.

The first case is processed, the first case is adjudicated according to the common law, the Trial Transcripts record the data that proved beyond reasonable doubt the nature of the crimes as they existed in fact, and The Public as a whole, and all the other Treasonous Fraud all know, we are all on Notice.

Not on our watch, not with our red pennies and dimes, enough is enough.

"There is no question of the general doctrine that fraud vitiates the most solemn contracts, documents, and even judgments" (United States v. Throckmorton, 98 US 61, 1878

The Conviction Factory, The Collapse of America's Criminal Courts, by Roger Roots
Page 40
Private Prosecutors
"For decades before and after the Revolution, the adjudication of criminals in America was governed primarily by the rule of private prosecution: (1) victims of serious crimes approached a community grand jury, (2) the grand jury investigated the matter and issued an indictment only if it concluded that a crime should be charged, and (3) the victim himself or his representative (generally an attorney but sometimes a state attorney general) prosecuted the defendant before a petit jury of twelve men. Criminal actions were only a step away from civil actions - the only material difference being that criminal claims ostensibly involved an interest of the public at large as well as the victim. Private prosecutors acted under authority of the people and in the name of the state - but for their own vindication. The very term "prosecutor" meant criminal plaintiff and implied a private person. A government prosecutor was referred to as an attorney general and was a rare phenomenon in criminal cases at the time of the nation's founding. When a private individual prosecuted an action in the name of the state, the attorney general was required to allow the prosecutor to use his name - even if the attorney general himself did not approve of the action.

"Private prosecution meant that criminal cases were for the most part limited by the need of crime victims for vindication. Crime victims held the keys to a potential defendant's fate and often negotiated the settlement of criminal cases. After a case was initiated in the name of the people, however, private prosecutors were prohibited from withdrawing the action pursuant to private agreement with the defendant. Court intervention was occasionally required to compel injured crime victims to appear against offenders in court and "not to make bargains to allow [defendants] to escape conviction, if they...repair the injury."

Page 42
Law Enforcement as a Universal Duty
"Law enforcement in the Founders' time was a duty of every citizen. Citizens were expected to be armed and equipped to chase suspects on foot, on horse, or with wagon whenever summoned. And when called upon to enforce the laws of the state, citizens were to respond "not faintly and with lagging steps, but honestly and bravely and with whatever implements and facilities [were] convenient and at hand. Any person could act in the capacity of a constable without being one, and when summoned by a law enforcement officer, a private person became a temporary member of the police department. The law also presumed that any person acting in his public capacity as an officer was rightfully appointed."

To the citizens of the United States by Thomas Paine
November 15, 1802
"But a faction, acting in disguise, was rising in America; they had lost sight of first principles. They were beginning to contemplate government as a profitable monopoly, and the people as hereditary property."

Lysander Spooner, Essay on The Trial by Jury, 1852
"It was a principle of the Common Law, as it is of the law of nature, and of common sense, that no man can be taxed without his personal consent. The Common Law knew nothing of that system, which now prevails in England, of assuming a man’s own consent to be taxed, because some pretended representative, whom he never authorized to act for him, has taken it upon himself to consent that he may be taxed. That is one of the many frauds on the Common Law, and the English constitution, which have been introduced since Magna Carta. Having finally established itself in England, it has been stupidly and servilely copied and submitted to in the United States.”

Caveat Emptor.