Trial Transcripts Rinse and Repeat IV
by Joe Kelley
“With a grand jury approach, the revealing of evidence herein shows that Dr. Anthony Fauci has deliberately ignored massive amounts of data showing that hydroxychloroquine is a safe, cheap and effective remedy for COVID-19. By ignoring his ethical responsibility as a physician to first do no harm, his behavior continues to cause preventable pain, suffering and death.”
The Indictment of Anthony Fauci for His Big Lie
Published 1 year ago on May 21, 2021
People go on about the LEFT versus RINO struggle for dominance over individuals by these Legal Fictions loosely called Collectivism. Reason clearly goes out the window as individual proponents of “Collectivism” (Legal Fiction Treasonous Fraud) target individuals for whatever individuals can give to individual proponents of Treasonous Fraud (Collectivism).
Treasonous Fraud Collectivists collect gifts from their victims because their victims consent to be robbed, raped, tortured, made to work for Treasonous Frauds, murdered, and mass murdered.
No means yes.
If individuals cannot be terrorized or bribed into giving up whatever they have individually, the individual proponents of Collectivism resort to extortion as any effective criminal does when faced with a liberated individual target unbiased by false propaganda produced by individual proponents of Collectivism.
Someone liberated from Treasonous Fraud can be a rare individual these days. Someone liberated from Treasonous Fraud and not terrified, can be a rarer individual these days.
Targets of Collectivism are thereby generally collected into at least 3 major majority groups of individuals. One might belong within or belong to one of these Majorities or Minorities.
Collectivism Targets falling victim to Treasonous Fraud:
a. Running from Treasonous Frauds claiming authority over facts that terrify people.
b. Running to Treasonous Frauds claiming authority over facts that defend people.
c. Frozen, inert, defenseless, ignorant, stupid, and servile because of terror on a conscious or subconscious level.
a. Running from the terrified group because the terror is discovered to be fraudulent.
b. Running to Treasonous Frauds for a piece of the action as the terrified group is consumed.
c. Actively terrifying, bribing, and extorting as a bribery victim joins the Treasonous Fraud group.
a. Does not fall victim to falsehoods.
b. Does not take the bait.
c. Must be kidnapped and forced to work for Treasonous Frauds despite every failed defensive effort over a short or long period of time attempting defense alone or with help.
The People's Panel
The Grand Jury in the United States, 1634 - 1941
Richard D. Younger
"They proved their effectiveness during the Colonial and Revolutionary periods in helping the colonists resist imperial interference. They provided a similar source of strength against outside pressure in the territories of the western United States, in the subject South following the Civil War, and in Mormon Utah. They frequently proved the only effective weapon against organized crime, malfeasance in office, and corruption in high places.
“But appreciation of the value of grand juries was always greater in times of crisis, and, during periods when threats to individual liberty were less obvious, legal reformers, efficiency experts, and a few who feared government by the people worked diligently to overthrow the institution. Proponents of the system, relying heavily on the democratic nature of the people's panel, on its role as a focal point for the expression of the public needs and the opportunity provided the individual citizen for direct participation in the enforcement of law, fought a losing battle. Opponents of the system leveled charges of inefficiency and tyranny against the panels of citizen investigators and pictured them as outmoded and expensive relics of the past. Charges of "star chamber" and "secret inquisition" helped discredit the institution in the eyes of the American people, and the crusade to abolish the grand jury, under the guise of bringing economy and efficiency to local government, succeeded in many states.”
“Grand juries, on the other hand, could issue their own subpoenas for witnesses for contempt and bring perjury charges against those who refused to tell the truth.”
Treasonous Fraud Licenses cost an individual their humanity, but that does not prevent an inhuman being from forming a new foundation of humanity over the ashes of their former inhumanity if an individual regains their individual, independent, power of will and moral conscience, and then that individual decides to liberate themselves from Treasonous Fraud.
Collectively speaking about individuals turning either to crime or away from it is a useful form of communication as information moves from one individual to another in time and place, as that information is either validated as accurate beyond probable cause for concern, or validated beyond reasonable doubt forensically supported with evidence factually, or JUST so much bullshit as to convince an individual that a Treasonous Fraud License does not Shield a criminal from discovery.
Private individuals independently discovering Treasonous Fraud meet with other private individuals who have also independently discovered Treasonous Fraud and collectively they form a power greater than their individual powers of defense against Treasonous Frauds.
The U.S. Supreme Court's Failure to Fix Plea Bargaining: The Impact of Lafler and Frye
“Plea bargaining is deeply entrenched in the U.S. criminal justice system. Overall, ninety-four percent to ninety-seven percent of criminal cases are resolved by guilty pleas and not through trials.' Plea bargaining in the United States began in the late eighteenth century and became the "dominant means of resolving criminal cases" by the nineteenth century.”
“The criticism includes that plea bargaining fails to protect defendants' rights, is a form of torture, is overly coercive, leads defendants to "game" the system," fails to take victims into account, reinforces inequality (particularly towards ethnic minorities)," leads to disparate sentencing," gives defendants better deals than they deserve," and undermines our system of justice due to its overuse at the expense of jury trials." Critics of plea bargaining express concern both about specific aspects of plea bargaining' and about the system as a whole.”
Individuals working voluntarily in cooperation for their mutual defense establish precedent when their collective efforts effectively and expediently work to deter Treasonous Fraud. The efforts of individual, independent, private prosecutors, independent, individual, County Grand Jurors, and independent, individual, County Criminal Trial Jurors, in command of all Criminal Jurisdiction Legally, make sure that Treasonous Fraud does not pay well as a vocation in a peaceful social structure defended legally in County Criminal Courts of Law of the individual people, by the individual people, and for the independent people liberating themselves from individual Treasonous Frauds as well as Collectivism.
THE REVOLUTIONARY AMERICAN JURY:
A CASE STUDY OF THE 1778-1779
PHILADELPHIA TREASON TRIALS
Carlton F.W. Larson
"The state government, in exile in Lancaster, soon began hearing reports of Pennsylvanians who were actively aiding or joining the British army. In March 1778, the Assembly, with assistance from Chief Justice McKean, passed a law entitled "An Act for the attainder of divers traitors." The law named twelve prominent individuals who had sided with the British and required them to appear for trial by April 20, 1778. If they failed to appear, they would be deemed "convicted and attainted of high treason, to all intents and purposes whatsoever." The Act also authorized the Supreme Executive Council to issue additional proclamations naming persons who had joined the British army. Any such persons who failed to appear for trial would also be attainted of high treason. Although such conditional bills of attainder would soon be prohibited by the U.S. Constitution, Pennsylvania did not seek primarily to hang people without trials, but to seize promptly the abandoned estates of loyalists who had fled to the British. The law accordingly set forth various procedures for seizing the estates of those persons who failed to report for trial."
Contemptuous Treasonous Frauds are not rare today. Is there any wonder why?