Parasites are Predators Too II
by Joe Kelley
8-6-2022

Roundtable 9: James Lindsay

A familiar tune played in the malevolent minds of potential and active Treasonous Fraud Parasitic Predators.

Introduction in my copy of The Prince by Niccolo Machiavelli
"Machiavelli's outlook was darkly pessimistic; the one element of St Augustine's thought which he wholeheartedly endorsed was the idea of original sin. As he puts it starkly in the same chapter 18 of The Prince, men are bad. This means that to deal with them as if they were good, honourable or trustworthy is to court disaster. In the Discourses (I,3) the point is repeated: 'all men are bad and are ever ready to display their malignity'. This must be the initial premise of those who play to found a republic. The business of politics is to try and salvage something positive from this unpromising conglomerate, and the aim of the state is to check those anarchic drives which are a constant threat to the common good. This is where The Prince fits into the spectrum of his wider thought: while a republic may be his preferred form of social organization, the crucial business of founding or restoring a state can only be performed by one exceptional individual."

Counterfeit republics are of, by, and for the counterfeiters, or if that is not true, then The Public Thing began as a counterfeit.

How can someone counterfeit something that does not yet exist?

Time travel?

Time: 29:09 or so
“...how do you separate feudalism from fascism…?”

The tried and true accurate accounting for those WHO are responsible way:

“[4] Hallam says, "The relation established between a lord and his vassal by the feudal tenure, far from containing principles of any servile and implicit obedience, permitted the compact to be dissolved in case of its violation by either party. This extended as much to the sovereign as to inferior lords. If a, vassal was aggrieved, and if justice was denied him, he sent a defiance, that is, a renunciation of fealty to the king, and was entitled to enforce redress at the point of his sword. It then became a contest of strength as between two independent potentates, and was terminated by treaty, advantageous or otherwise, according to the fortune of war. There remained the original principle, that allegiance depended conditionally upon good treatment, and that an appeal might be lawfully made to arms against an oppressive government. Nor was this, we may be sure, left for extreme necessity, or thought to require a long-enduring forbearance. In modern times, a king, compelled by his subjects' swords to abandon any pretension, would be supposed to have ceased to reign; and the express recognition of such a right as that of insurrection has been justly deemed inconsistent with the majesty of law. But ruder ages had ruder sentiments. Force was necessary to repel force; and men accustomed to see the king's authority defied by a private riot, were not much shocked when it was resisted in defence of public freedom." - 3 Middle Age, 240-2.”
Essay on The Trial by Jury
Lysander Spooner, 1852

The National Communist LEFT, National Nationalist Center, and Nationalist Socialist RIGHT take turns creating problems for each other to Build Back Better. Each creates the same problem, again, and again, and again, to allow each other to solve those problems again, and again, and again, as exposed by George Orwell in his Novel idea for a book documented as 1984, and confirmed forensically by the work of Anthony Sutton with his Trilogy about Wall Street funding Nazi Germany, Bolshevik Russia, and The Reign of FDR in America.

See also Gerald Celente reporting the routine Currency Wars, Trade War & World War.

Strictly verboten are conscientious objectors conscientiously objecting to blindingly obeying the order to take an eye for the eye taken.

WHO wrote the complete history of inhumanity inhumanly consuming humanity in Feudal Times?

“For more than six hundred years—that is, since Magna Carta, in 1215—there has been no clearer principle of English or American constitutional law, than that, in criminal cases, it is not only the right and duty of juries to judge what are the facts, what is the law, and what was the moral intent of the accused; but that it is also their right, and their primary and paramount duty, to judge of the justice of the law, and to hold all laws invalid, that are, in their opinion, unjust or oppressive, and all persons guiltless in violating, or resisting the execution of, such laws.

“Unless such be the right and duty of jurors, it is plain that, instead of juries being a “palladium of liberty”—a barrier against the tyranny and oppression of the government—they are really mere tools in its hands, for carrying into execution any injustice and oppression it may desire to have executed.

“But for their right to judge of the law, and the justice of the law, juries would be no protection to an accused person, even as to matters of fact; for, if the government can dictate to a jury any law whatever, in a criminal case, it can certainly dictate to them the laws of evidence. That is, it can dictate what evidence is admissible, and what inadmissible, and also what force or weight is to be given to the evidence admitted. And if the government can thus dictate to a jury the laws of evidence, it can not only make it necessary for them to convict on a partial exhibition of the evidence rightfully pertaining to the case, but it can even require them to convict on any evidence whatever that it pleases to offer them.

“That the rights and duties of jurors must necessarily be such as are here claimed for them, will be evident when it is considered what the trial by jury is, and what is its object.

“The trial by jury,” then, is a “trial by the country”—that is, by the people—as distinguished from a trial by the government.”
Ibid

What is on the monopoly menu dictated by Santa Claus Anal Schwab?

Nationalism and the bugs built into the system, but you are not allowed to ask questions.

Time: 29:09 or so
“...how do you separate feudalism from fascism…?”

How dare you!

Debate in Virginia Ratifying Convention
June 7, 1788
George Mason:
“Among the enumerated powers, Congress are to lay and collect taxes, duties, imposts, and excises, and to pay the debts, and to provide for the general welfare and common defence; and by that clause (so often called the sweeping clause) they are to make all laws necessary to execute those laws. Now, suppose oppressions should arise under this government, and any writer should dare to stand forth, and expose to the community at large the abuses of those powers; could not Congress, under the idea of providing for the general welfare, and under their own construction, say that this was destroying the general peace, encouraging sedition, and poisoning the minds of the people? And could they not, in order to provide against this, lay a dangerous restriction On the press? Might they not even bring the trial of this restriction within the ten miles square, when there is no prohibition against it? Might they not thus destroy the trial by jury?”

Like clockwork, the old tried and true methods of ensuring the clearly marked demarcation line between Treasonous Fraud Parasitic Predators, and Counterfeits, are sent down the memory hole never to be used again, each time The People have to re-invent the already existing wheel, organically, from grass-roots, so as to adapt to the newest version of The Infantile State. Only during revolutionary times and places.

Technology gave us the printing press, long live a thing!

People might want to remember the facts that matter in any case of someone creating a better mouse trap, and then suddenly both the creator and the now forgotten mouse trap have been removed from the Publik Skewl Program.

Council of Stake Holders insist.

Caveat Emptor