Global Nationalism
V
Federated Republics
One
by Joe Kelley
1-27-2023

90 Seconds to Midnight?
A clear signal to the US leadership that there will be no survivors in any nuclear exchange between the US and Russia
Scott Ritter
Jan 24
[scottritterextra.com]

“This plan has been in place since at least 2008, when the former US Ambassador to Russia (and current Director of the CIA), William Burns, warned that any effort by NATO to bring Ukraine into its ranks would precipitate an eventual Russian military intervention. Despite this stark warning, NATO extended an invitation to Ukraine in November 2008, clearly initiating a known cause-effect relationship that defined NATO’s policy toward Russia as being one which sought a proxy conflict using Ukraine as a stand-in for NATO.”

The Plan dates back to the beginnings of recorded human history and records of humanity are recorded in human DNA, therefore, The Plan dates back before written human history written on stone tablets.

The Plan has been to deceive mankind into a trap set by the transformed beasts that gave up on humanity.

The Deceiver’s Plan is from The Deceiver as proven by the required Bait that is set into The Planned Attack upon humanity.

The bait in the trap is freedom from moral duty.

Moral duty is a human CODE whereby each independent individual example of humanity moves from a solid foundation discovered, validated, and prosecuted by each independent individual example of humanity, and then, once on solid ground, each step taken is by the same due process of law.

Discover, validated, and prosecute the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth, and each morally CODED human being moves expediently further away from the bait in the trap set by The Deceiver and all his minions.

Some humans discover The Deceiver in time to avoid the trap, and those humans have been known to warn the rest of humanity as a gift from one human to another human generously given to save humanity.

By proxy, the independent individual making a discovery of The Deceiver, validating that discovery, and prosecuting a way around the bait in the net, saves humanity with the gift of warning, after having saved oneself from the bait that lures humanity into The Deceiver’s trap, one at a time. 

Papers of Dr. James McHenry on the Federal Convention of 1787
"Mr. E. Gerry. Does not rise to speak to the merits of the question before the Committee but to the mode.
"A distinction has been made between a federal and national government. We ought not to determine that there is this distinction for if we do, it is questionable not only whether this convention can propose an government totally different or whether Congress itself would have a right to pass such a resolution as that before the house. The commission from Massachusets empowers the deputies to proceed agreeably to the recommendation of Congress. This the foundation of the convention. If we have a right to pass this resolution we have a right to annihilate the confederation."

In Convention, Richmond, Monday, June 9, 1788
Patrick Henry
“A number of characters, of the greatest eminence in this country, object to this government for its consolidating tendency. This is not imaginary. It is a formidable reality. If consolidation proves to be as mischievous to this country as it has been to other countries, what will the poor inhabitants of this country do? This government will operate like an ambuscade. It will destroy the state governments, and swallow the liberties of the people, without giving previous notice. If gentlemen are willing to run the hazard, let them run it; but I shall exculpate myself by my opposition and monitory warnings within these walls. But then comes paper money. We are at peace on this subject. Though this is a thing which that mighty federal Convention had no business with, yet I acknowledge that paper money would be the bane of this country. I detest it. Nothing can justify a people in resorting to it but extreme necessity. It is at rest, however, in this commonwealth. It is no longer solicited or advocated.”

“On this awful occasion, did you want a federal government? Did federal ideas possess your minds? Did federal ideas lead you to the most splendid victories? I must again repeat the favorite idea, that the genius of Virginia did, and will again, lead us to happiness. To obtain the most splendid prize, you did not consolidate. You accomplished the most glorious ends by the assistance of the genius of your country. Men were then taught by that genius, that they were fighting for what was most dear to them. View the most affectionate father, the most tender mother, operated on by liberty, nobly stimulating their sons their dearest sons sometimes their only son to advance to the defence of their country. We have seen sons of Cincinnatus, without splendid magnificence or parade, going, with the genius of their great progenitor, Cincinnatus, to the plough; men who served their country without ruining it's men who had served it to the destruction of their private patrimonies their country owing them amazing amounts, for the payment of which no adequate provision was then made. We have seen such men throw prostrate their arms at your feet. They did not call for those emoluments which ambition presents to some imaginations. The soldiers, who were able to command every thing, instead of trampling on those laws which they were instituted to defend, most strictly obeyed them. The hands of justice have not been laid on a single American soldier.”

June 14, 1788
Patrick Henry:
"Mr. Chairman, it is now confessed that this is a national government. There is not a single federal feature in it. It has been alleged, within these walls, during the debates, to be national and federal, as it suited the arguments of gentlemen."

Patrick Henry, July 7, 1788
"The style of the government (We, the people) was introduced perhaps to recommend it to the people at large; to those citizens who are to be levelled and degraded to the lowest degree; who are likened to a herd; and who, by the operation of this blessed system, are to be transformed from respectable, independent citizens, to abject, dependent subjects or slaves. The honorable gentleman has anticipated what we are to be reduced to, by degradingly assimilating our citizens to a herd."

Each independent individual can save oneself from the trap, doing so by avoiding the bait that fraudulently suggests to the victim that the victim can give away their own moral duty, but this bait is fraudulent, since giving up moral duty is to give up on oneself, and by proxy, giving up on humanity.

Give Me Liberty Or Give Me Death
Patrick Henry, March 23, 1775.
“Mr. President, it is natural to man to indulge in the illusions of hope. We are apt to shut our eyes against a painful truth, and listen to the song of that siren till she transforms us into beasts. Is this the part of wise men, engaged in a great and arduous struggle for liberty? Are we disposed to be of the number of those who, having eyes, see not, and, having ears, hear not, the things which so nearly concern their temporal salvation? For my part, whatever anguish of spirit it may cost, I am willing to know the whole truth; to know the worst, and to provide for it.”

No thanks, I prefer humanity, if all of you think that you have to do as you are told, or else, think again, it isn’t over until the Fat Lady Sings.

Caveat Emptor