slug.com slug.com
0 0

Justice divorced from the facts that matter in any case is like enforced laughter for the official comedian’s jokes.

Update on Law Power Progress (Voluntary Mutual Defense) includes a series of messages from several sources combining to fit into the Power Struggle in thought, not in action personally. Thought drives action like energy released as power will force massive objects on specific vectors: action.

From Conviction Factory by Roger Roots I ran into a clear difference of opinion, and my study contradicts the messages by Roger Roots concerning something called the Exclusionary Rule. This is to me a contradiction that favors the concept of individual power of will driven by individual moral conscience, as opposed to external or “collective” power exerted outside an individual human, a power that goes against the individual human power driven by moral conscience. Normal people act morally by their individual power of will, even if suggestions of moral actions are offered by other people and then agreed upon by individuals. Normal people resist (revolution) immoral demands that extort normal people into immoral actions: external power exerted upon individuals without consent. The exclusionary rule appears to be a “central” (immoral) control imposed upon individuals.

Also, from The Unconstitutionality of Criminal Jury Selection, by Brittany L. Deitch are messages that ring true in an area of study I have not previously worked on in depth, and the message here clearly moves POWER back to the people (free market individuals), POWER not allowed to be abused by THE so-called “government” monopoly. Many competitive (individuals) offering better government is in opposition (revolutionary) to ONE government power, Top Down, Dictatorial, Immoral, and self-serving the ONE government power ONLY.

It seems appropriate to interject at this point a clear distinction between forms of human interactions (driven by human thoughts in independent minds) that fall under a general heading of competition.

  1. Competition to agree to afford each other the opportunity to set a higher standard of living at a lower cost, and those best able are thereby free and at liberty to move themselves (at their own cost, meaning not by enslaving other people) from worse life to better life, and then the number of individuals free to do this constitutes a rising tide that lifts all boats: competitive forces force ever greater quality at ever lower price because people, as a natural rule, choose better instead of worse.

  2. Counterfeit Competition, or antagonistic competition, whereby the RULE is to gain at the expense of people who are able to compete non-antagonistically: Subsidized Slavery of everyone including the Slave Masters. As “one size fits all” Top Down dictatorial thoughts and behaviors (who is allowed to produce what is allowed to be produced, and who is allowed to take how much wealth from that productive capacity that is allowed to exist) moves – dictatorial non-competition monopoly power moves - the quality of life ever lower while the cost of life rises constantly.

An analogy would be a tennis match performed by athletes in a yearly tournament, and that proceeds competitively until someone counterfeits the original intent of the competition (voluntary improvement of competition) and “cheaters” start adding “RULES” that work one way for the “cheaters” and the opponents are not “privileged” concerning the TWO sets of RULES concept, leading eventually to a point where the “cheaters” hire a “Lone Gunman” to take out the opponents who challenge the absolute (arbitrary) authority of the “cheater class” of “players.” Under competitive (voluntary) rules the players tend to get better over time, while non-competitive (involuntary) rules the criminals just shoot the best players so as to allow criminals to win by criminal means.

So how can the competitors ever escape the cheating criminals? A fundamental point worth pondering is the requirement of discovery concerning the moves that move from the ONE SET OF RULES to the TWO SETS OF RULES, whereby the CRIMINALS ENFORCE SUBSIDIZED SLAVERY. The truth won’t set anyone free, but it is a foundation from which to then begin competition in the supply of a demanded freedom in liberty. Remember the idea of Federation as a competition between States to provide the highest quality government at the lowest cost to those who invest in and get that which they demand for their investments. If the truth is not worth anything to the victims of criminals, then criminals are the only ones actually seeking the truth. If people do not care to know the voluntary nature of a federation under the common law, then people who exploit that ignorance are those who shoot down any attempt to spread that truth, they know the truth as demonstrated by their choice to shoot down that specific information.

As to the exclusionary rule:

  1. Dictatorial RULE:

Accused defendants are illegally searched and evidence is then kept from the jury by the judge, because of the illegal search by the PERPETRATOR of a treasonous fraud obtained the information criminally. A government agent perpetrates a serious crime in order to get information on a FELLOW criminal. A FELLOW criminal Judge then shoots down the information that is necessary for The Country (through a jury) to accurately identify a FELLOW criminal.

  1. Common Law, Law of the Land, Due Process, Legem Terrae SUGGESTION offered by past defenders to present defenders who sit on Trial Juries attempting to discover and employ the facts that matter in a criminal case:

Accused defendants face a Trial by Jury (common law) where the power of the individual jurors is as much power as anyone else, a moral duty, to get to the truth of the matter, and to competitively judge the case based upon the merits of the case: individually.

1 above is COUNTER to 2 above: opposite. One censors the truth, the other employs the facts that matter in the case.

Roger Roots (I have not finished the book yet) appears to “believe” in number 1 above. These are my words, not his, and I can quote from the book at a later date. But the point I am trying to make here is the point about Treasonous Fraud. Those who are the government act morally with or without a badge, license, or government pay check for profit. Those who commit crimes, causing injury to individual members of the public, constitute clear and present dangers to individual members of the public, and therefore those crimes perpetrated by those criminals warrant government action in defense: probable cause to act in defense of the innocent from the guilty. Those WITH government license, badges, shields, offices, and profitable pay checks, add the crime of treason to the crime they perpetrate BECAUSE they corrupt the system of government when they use the “authority” of defense to instead perpetrate offense.

The case against the defendant, whereby someone (police or non-police: NGO) obtains evidence illegally, is ONE criminal case on its own, an individual case, and a case that warrants justice through due process, to get to the truth, to protect and serve everyone including the accused, so the evidence required to judge the case is required to judge the case: a point worth knowing. So, there is this case in view, a perpetrator attacks someone, a robbery, a rape, and that is ONE case, alone, while the next crime that is perpetrated (separate crime) is the crime of attacking someone by gaining evidence unlawfully, illegally, criminally, as the criminal perpetrator perpetrates the crime upon the (presumed) to be innocent victim of this attack upon that victim by that perpetrator who perpetrates that crime at that crime scene. The rape is a crime scene. The attack by the attacker gaining evidence illegally is a separate crime scene.

The fact that someone (police or non-police: NGO) perpetrated a crime against someone’s natural rights, infringing upon those rights, is another case, so now there are TWO cases, not ONE case. Why would someone add yet another crime, a crime of censoring the facts that matter in the one case, because another UNRELATED crime was commingled with the rape case? One crime is the rape. A second crime is the illegal evidence attack on the natural rights of the individual. The third crime is to employ ONE crime to then tamper with the jury by withholding necessary evidence required to judge the case judiciously.

Crime 1: An example rape case.
Crime 2: Criminal infringement of natural rights (illegally obtaining evidence from the victim)
Crime 3: Jury tampering as a fake judge dictates the censorship of necessary evidence in the rape case, jury tampering, usurping the legal jurisdiction of the common law jurors who are the judges of fact, law, evidence, guilt, innocence, and their powers are civil and criminal jurisdiction on par with any other legal power.

Why are people free and at liberty to infringe upon the Natural Rights of people with impunity? The answer is clearly such that the criminals have taken over, and instead of ONE set of rules for ALL, there are arbitrary rules dictated by dictators who do whatever they want to anyone with impunity: just ask them.

As to the process called Voir Dire (Jury Selection) and the POWER to exclude people from the jury there is again a working principle that belongs to The People as a whole, and this principle has been working as one since Ancient Times (The Ancient Law: The Law of the Land, common law, Legem Terrae) whereby the POWER to judge cannot rightfully be given to individuals who do not represent The People as a whole, rather they are people with a bias to a criminal gang.

This is why competition ONE must be accurately discriminated (judged) from competition TWO.

All criminal gangs perpetrate treason against free people in liberty, a matter of fact.

A fact that matters.

A criminal gang robs or rapes an individual or individuals, but each individual must be unique in law, if not then why not; why claim the legitimacy of “collective” punishment?

As it is with One case of rape (or robbery), it is separate from another case of illegally obtaining evidence, or infringement of natural rights by a perpetrator upon a victim. As it again is a separate case where a counterfeit judge overrules the absolute requirement of moving inculpatory or exculpatory evidence to the Jury so as to afford the Jury the required data required to judge the case, is yet another crime. As those are all separate crimes, so are those crimes involving gangs of criminals and gangs of victims. Each member of each gang constitute a separate crime scene for each incidence of each crime.

So why does the competition factor explain all the confusion arsing when all these separate, individual, cases are collectivized into one Top Down, One Size Fits All, Dictatorial, Tyrannical, Final Solution to the ONE government problem?

Each individual must take the law into their individual hands each time and each place, each having the power to defend instead of offend, every time, each time. The power to do so exists only in human mural conscience. The power is not found in a book. A book, or a tablet, can only suggest like a memory bank suggests, to the reasoning, logic, discriminating, choosing, willful, deciding, calculating, real-time judgment POWER: an individual with a moral conscience.

The number 12 is a curious data point from the memory bank of human experience: The Ancient Law (common law, law of the land).

Who chooses who sits on any lawful jury to defend the innocent and account for those who are guilty in fact?

If a criminal is going to choose, then is justice the goal according to that criminal’s choices?

If 2 criminals are going to choose, what happens when that happens?

If 12 criminals are going to choose, are the chances of reaching the goal to defend the innocent and account for those who are guilty better when COMPETITIVELY compared to 12 moral people choosing which people will sit on a jury?

The idea here is to offer data to anyone who cares to read data on this subject matter, so the above are questions that may be worth pondering, to people who care (moral people).

Most people don’t stare at the sun.

Josf-Kelley 8 May 18
Share
You must be a member of this group before commenting. Join Group

Be part of the movement!

Welcome to the community for those who value free speech, evidence and civil discourse.

Create your free account

Recent Visitors 2

Photos 19 More

Posted by Josf-KelleyWanted for Treason That is all for lack of intelligence and moral conscience.

Posted by Josf-KelleyBorrowed from another IDW post is the pictured meme.

Posted by Josf-KelleyReal Reality A few people have purchased the exclusive power to add zeros to their Bank account balance, and they accomplish this feat by borrowing their spending from anyone who can produce ...

Posted by HeresiarchWhy you should close Social Media accounts you no longer use. (I shut down my LinkedIn account immediately)

Posted by HeresiarchI taught my daughter to shoot at ten years old. Now she's passing on the lessons she learned.

Posted by HeresiarchIt's taken us years to rehabilitate the soil on our Better Than Organic farmlet.

Posted by Josf-KelleyThat is a complex process viewed simplistically in two directions that appear, in simple form, to be opposites.

Posted by Josf-KelleyThe level of brainwashing or mind control, or spirit control, or body control, or behavior control is demonstrably on a sub-conscious level and it runs very deep.

Posted by HeresiarchHow do you sacrifice children?

Posted by HeresiarchHow's that Police State workin' out for y'all?

Posted by Josf-KelleyFrom a source:

Posted by Josf-KelleyTrump says Pence can reject criminal votes.

Posted by Josf-KelleyFrom another IDW post: Roadmap to re-inauguration:

Posted by Josf-KelleyAt a Pennsylvania State Hearing, widespread voter and election fraud is reported by witness testimony.

Posted by Josf-KelleyThe following link is immediately censored from Facebook, as I press the enter button, a warning page loads.

Posted by Josf-KelleyI was banished (for speaking the truth to power) from Culture War (IDW topics) and occasionally I am presented with posts in my feed that lead to that exclusive group, so I can't enter, and a I can't ...

  • Top tags#government #USA #rights #video #world #truth #money #crime #evidence #laws #reason #freedom #evil #children #justice #god #death #TheTruth #society #vote #liberty #federal #moral #media #Police #community #hope #violence #Constitution #hell #crimes #biden #book #military #earth #fear #politics #murder #created #Present #humanity #Congress #democrats #liberal #population #slavery #China #IDW #nation #politicians ...

    Members 37Top

    Moderator