In the previous effort to convey the facts that matter in the case against counterfeit governments a statement was made concerning a fork in the road for the English and the Irish people as a whole, as in The Public Thing. It may be difficult to grasp at first but the law, if it is genuine, is for everyone: for The Public as a whole, and that applies no matter the individual, family, church, corporation, town, city, county, state, or federation of states, or even federation of federations on Earth. If it is the law it is as good for English as it is for Irish, Indians, Africans, Slaves, or so-called Barbarians. If is the law it is as good for one as it is for the other one, even if one was once a criminal.

The law is not good for a criminal planning a crime with the certain force of will, and malice aforethought, to perpetrate a crime, IN THE MIND OF THE CRIMINAL. In actual reality (outside the mind of a criminal in the process of being a criminal) crime is not good for the criminal any more than it is good for the victims targeted by a criminal, for the same criminal could have chosen the right fork in the road traveled by the individual before the individual ran into that fork in the road where the individual decided, by power of will, to take a bad turn down a bad road.

In this effort I will move from the obvious confession of malice, malevolence, malfeasance, misfeasance, nonfeasance, and treason, concerning the English counterfeit government attempts to exterminate and enslave the Irish. I will move from the obvious turn down the wrong path by all the English who could have used English common law (actual not counterfeit) to completely remove any further consumption of Irish lives, so as to line the pockets and fill the bank accounts of English Empire Investors. I will turn also from the same failure of the Americans to do right by the Indians native to America when Europeans arrived, a failure to use actual law to avoid any further consumption of Indian lives, so as to line the pockets and fill the bank accounts of English Empire Investors. I will turn to the case against the consumers of African lives. Many people fought the good fight in America, a revolutionary fight against counterfeit governments, and among those many people were many people (certainly not enough people) fighting against African Slavery, very few (only 2 I could find so far) used the actual law power.

Cases in point:

Hold on, after searching again, I found a very good example from a Web Page that just now crossed my path:

Case 1:
"The celebrated Somerset ruling of 1772 concerned a slave's liberty and status as property. The slave James Somerset (or Sommersett) was the property of a Boston customs official, Charles Stewart. Somerset was brought to England. After two years he escaped, but he was recaptured on 26 November 1771 and was forced onto a ship bound for Jamaica. With help from Granville Sharpe, a humanitarian anti-slavery campaigner, a writ of habeas corpus was granted by Lord Mansfield, the Lord Chief Justice, ordering the captain of the ship on which Somerset was incarcerated to produce Somerset before a court.
The case was repeatedly adjourned. Somerset's legal team argued that although slavery was tolerated in the colonies, the Court of King's Bench was bound to apply the law of England. Mansfield ruled in 1772 that 'no master ever was allowed here (England) to take a slave by force to be sold abroad because he deserted from his service...therefore the man must be discharged'. And so James Somerset won his freedom."

This is another rabbit hole, but it serves a purpose in my current effort to make sense of the current battle between law based upon truth and opposing that is counterfeit law (crime) based upon counterfeit truth (fraud). So the case above makes sense in this context. People use the law - the truth - to set a slave free. That is the law in fact. That is the law demonstrated for what it is - the law - in fact. From the same link above is the following FINE PRINT:

"Lord Mansfield's judgment had a profound effect on slaves. Many of them misunderstood the ruling to mean that slaves were emancipated in Britain. This was not the case. The decision was that no slave could be forcibly removed from Britain and sold into slavery.
Despite Lord Mansfield's ruling, slave owners continued recapturing their runaway slaves and shipping them back to the colonies. Numerous newspaper advertisements of the time show that Black slaves were still being bought and sold in England. A few years later, in 1785, Mansfield himself ruled that 'black slaves in Britain were not entitled to be paid for their labour' (free Black people were, however, paid)."

The case serves the current purpose in many ways, it shows as before stated, that it is in the power of people to use the actual truth based law to free victims from criminals, to free victims from all enemies foreign and domestic. Any one in England could have done the same for anyone soon to be exterminated or enslaved in Ireland before the pogrom and roundup started, and anyone in American could have done the same for any Indian before, or since, the criminals took over the government in America, saving countless Irish, and saving countless Indians since those solutions to those problems began much like the Nazi (counterfeit government Party) Final Solution to their so-called Jewish Problem.

Now moving to a message published during the coup when the criminals took over American government, and in this message are words that explain the stark difference between actual law and counterfeit law. I will post this message in its entirety, then I will take out the relevant quote and comment further on it, and that will be the end of this days effort until next time.

"Rhode Island Is Right!

"This essay appeared in The Massachusetts Gazette, December 7, 1787, as reprinted From The Freeman's Journal; (Or, The North-American Intelligencer?)

"The abuse which has been thrown upon the state of Rhode Island seems to be greatly unmerited. Popular favor is variable, and those who are now despised and insulted may soon change situations with the present idols of the people. Rhode Island has out done even Pennsylvania in the glorious work of freeing the Negroes in this country, without which the patriotism of some states appears ridiculous. The General Assembly of the state of Rhode Island has prevented the further importation of Negroes, and have made a law by which all blacks born in that state after March, 1784, are absolutely and at once free.

"They have fully complied with the recommendations of Congress in regard to the late treaty of peace with Great Britain, and have passed an act declaring it to be the law of the land. They have never refused their quota of taxes demanded by Congress, excepting the five per cent impost, which they considered as a dangerous tax, and for which at present there is perhaps no great necessity, as the western territory, of which a part has very lately been sold at a considerable price, may soon produce an immense revenue; and, in the interim, Congress may raise in the old manner the taxes which shall be found necessary for the support of the government.

"The state of Rhode Island refused to send delegates to the Federal Convention, and the event has manifested that their refusal was a happy one as the new constitution, which the Convention has proposed to us, is an elective monarchy, which is proverbially the worst government. This new government would have been supported at a vast expense, by which our taxes - the right of which is solely vested in Congress, (a circumstance which manifests that the various states of the union will be merely corporations) - would be doubled or trebled.

"The liberty of the press is not stipulated for, and therefore may be invaded at pleasure. The supreme continental court is to have, almost in every case, "appellate jurisdiction, both as to law and fact," which signifies, if there is any meaning in words, the setting aside the trial by jury. Congress will have the power of guaranteeing to every state a right to import Negroes for twenty one years, by which some of the states, who have now declined that iniquitous traffic, may re-enter into it - for the private laws of every state are to submit to the superior jurisdiction of Congress. A standing army is to be kept on foot, by which the vicious, the sycophantick, and the time-serving will be exalted, and the brave, the patriotic, and the virtuous will be depressed.

"The writer, therefore, thinks it the part of wisdom to abide, like the state of Rhode Island, by the old articles of confederation, which, if re-examined with attention, we shall find worthy of great regard; that we should give high praise to the manly and public spirited sixteen members, who lately seceded from our house of Assembly [in Pennsylvania]; and that we should all impress with great care, this truth on our minds - That it is very easy to change a free government into an arbitrary one, but that it is very difficult to convert tyranny into freedom."

The law, based upon the truth not counterfeit truth, is how people peacefully convert tyranny into freedom. The words in the above message clearly shows the difference between the actual law and the false law:

"Rhode Island has out done even Pennsylvania in the glorious work of freeing the Negroes in this country, without which the patriotism of some states appears ridiculous."

People today who have begin to wake themselves from the spell (it is devilish) they have been under, a willful ignorance that can be described accurately as stupidity, are people who once "believed" in the lies told by criminals in government, and these waking people are now seeing just how ridiculous they were under their spell. Anyone today who begins down the path of waking up from devilish spell they have been under can begin to look at modern slavery, for what it is in fact, and as already shown above, those who could have freed those slaves back then could have done so peacefully, of only enough people actually new the real law power.