The data offered so far can be summed up as Free Market Government Services as well as Voluntary Mutual Defense Association. The more particular data dives into the devilish details with the obvious need to accurately discriminate the clear and present demarcation line between those who destroy life and those who preserve it, making life better and less costly. The finer points of data describe specific processes that work to reach the obviously necessary goal of finding those facts that matter in any case where those devils have been doing their devilish work.

Such phrases as the tide that lifts all boats, which is a reference to free markets where free people maintain liberty long enough to produce the higher quality products that reduce our individual costs of living, whereby all those individual increases in the quality of life, and all those individual reductions in the cost of life constitute a collective sum total of a rising tide.

Competition in all markets, not excluding protective services, and not excluding powerful services such as banking services, so long as competition remains civil, meaning non-criminal, said non-aggressive competition forces (by non-criminal forces) quality up and cost down. The force that acts like the gravity from the moon to rise the tide. Cooperative competition, where the shared goal is to rise the tide, can be compared to the opposite - criminal - competition where the shared goal shared by the criminals is to extract the wealth from those who dare to produce anything worth stealing: including children.

The force of liberty, likened to the gravity of the moon, rises the tide, as people accomplish the goal of deterring, discouraging, accounting for, and not funding crime, so as then to allow that force of gravity to work naturally: rising the tide that lifts all boats. The force of organized crime - particularly fake government - works as the moon moves to rise the tide on the other side of the planet, and the force then lowers all boats, even the boats kept afloat by consuming victims, those boats where the criminals fund everything with stolen loot.

Liberty - competition - higher quality lower cost - rising tide - everyone wins, even the criminals.

Organized Crime Fake Government - monopoly - lower quality higher cost charged to those who produce anything worth stealing - lowering tide - everyone loses, even the criminals.

Back to data currently flowing through my improving viewpoint:

52
New York, 1676-1686

"The fur trade was crucial to the economy of the northern colonies in this era, and fur traders were always attempting to opt out of the shifting winds of free competition by obtaining exclusive monopoly privileges for themselves from the government. Governor Andros proved amenable to granting monopolies. In the summer of 1678 he granted a monopoly of the fur trade for the merchants of New York City. The privileged monopolists (or oligopolists) of Albany, were, of course, not happy about having to sell their furs to a similarly privileged set of oligopolists (here defines as several receivers of common grants of exclusive privilege). The twenty-odd Albany Handlaers, however, did manage to get rid of Timothy Cooper, an Albany agent for the manorial ruler of Springfield, Massachusetts, John Pynchon. Cooper’s private mail was purloined by the Albany magistrates, and on the strength of critical statements about the Handlaers, Cooper was officially expelled from Albany by the governor and the Council.  
In the same year, Andros took the highly significant step of establishing a monopoly of the important export commodity, flour. By 1680 all bolting and packaging of flour was reserved exclusively to resident merchants of New York City, who also had to be freemen of that city. This flour monopoly brought in much revenue to the Crown; the monopolists payed for the privilege in the form of inspection fees, taxes, etc. But it rightly embittered the merchants outside the city, who were grievously injured, and the wheat farmers of New York, who say their prices fall sharply as their market was greatly narrowed to a few privileged New York City merchants. The result was the crushing of the successful flour mills already established at such spots as Rensselaerswyck, Albany, and Kingston, the last town barely escaping the fines to punish the vigor of its protests.   
The wheat and other grain farmers were further mulcted by an absolute prohibition on the export of grain in force since 1673. This ban greatly depressed the price of wheat earned by the farmer, while privileging the New York merchants with an artificially cheap cost for the grain purchased. Grain prices were further lowered artificially by prohibiting the distilling of liquor in New York, thus shutting off an important market for local grain. This prohibition privileged the New York City merchants again by lowering the cost of grain and by choking off the effective competition of local whiskey with West India rum. Which constituted one of the merchants’ major imports.”   

Conceived in Liberty, Murray Rothbard, 1979
Page 370, 371

The word for the day: mulcted
"deprive someone of (money or possessions) by fraudulent means."