I will only tell you ONCE!

What are some common principles granted by people to other people when the shared goal is peace, harmony, productive cooperation, and effective, efficient, timely, expedient, preservation of the essential liberty required in order to maintain peace?

53
Turmoil in East New Jersey,
1678-1686

“In May Andros issued a warrant for the arrest of Philip Carteret and a few of his leading councillors “for having presumed to assume and exercise authority and jurisdiction over the King’s subjects.” Carteret was seized, beaten, and tried before the New York Court of Assizes. He defended himself vigorously and protested a court where the accuser, jailer, and judge were one. The jury, however, upset Andros’ imperialist plans by acquitting Carteret, a verdict they thrice persisted in, even under severe pressure from Andros. The court, however, ordered Carteret to cease jurisdiction, and Andros and his Council went to Elizabethtown to meet the deputies from Jersey.” 

Page 380, 381
Conceived in Liberty, Murray Rothbard, 1979

3 times the stacked jury said no, we shield this innocent man from your despotic tyranny, your terrorism, your intent to continue to do bodily harm to that innocent one.

What about the sword?

“The state is divided into counties. In every county are appointed magistrates, called justices of the peace, usually from eight to thirty or forty in number, in proportion to the size of the county, of the most discreet and honest inhabitants. They are nominated by their fellows, but commissioned by the governor, and act without reward. These magistrates have jurisdiction both criminal and civil. If the question before them be a question of law only, they decide on it themselves: but if it be of fact, or of fact and law combined, it must be referred to a jury. In the latter case, of a combination of law and fact, it is usual for the jurors to decide the fact, and to refer the law arising on it to the decision of the judges. But this division of the subject lies with their discretion only. And if the question relate to any point of public liberty, or if it be one of those in which the judges may be suspected of bias, the jury undertake to decide both law and fact. If they be mistaken, a decision against right, which is casual only, is less dangerous to the state, and less afflicting to the loser, than one which makes part of a regular and uniform system. In truth, it is better to toss up cross and pile in a cause, than to refer it to a judge whose mind is warped by any motive whatever, in that particular case. But the common sense of twelve honest men gives still a better chance of just decision, than the hazard of cross and pile. These judges execute their process by the sheriff or coroner of the county, or by constables of their own appointment. If any free person commit an offence against the commonwealth, if it be below the degree of felony, he is bound by a justice to appear before their court, to answer it on indictment or information. If it amount to felony, he is committed to jail, a court of these justices is called; if they on examination think him guilty, they send him to the jail of the general court, before which court he is to be tried first by a grand jury of 24, of whom 13 must concur in opinion: if they find him guilty, he is then tried by a jury of 12 men of the county where the offence was committed, and by their verdict, which must be unanimous, he is acquitted or condemned without appeal.”
Notes on the State of Virginia
by Thomas Jefferson
Feb. 27, 1787

Note: "without appeal."

What is Appellate Jurisdiction?

What about the sword? Where is the step by step procedure employed to accuse and indict and provide a court date for their defense in a trial by the country anyone, and especially those criminals infesting government?

I know much of it, but repeating the steps over and over again in a vacuum is akin to beating a dead horse, so my efforts document, at least in my own powerless world, the death of law in America.