Supply and Demand II:

What governs the rate at which the looters increase in number, what is their shared rule?

Clearly the looters do not have the power to increase their number beyond affordability.

Another clear understanding of this rule that dictates how dictators loot their prey is the demand for and then the supply of a means by which the looters loot more efficiently, so as to avoid restrictions in their ability to loot those who produce anything worth stealing.

Enter stage left (or right) a Central Banking Confidence Scheme.

If the rate of power flowing from the producers producing theft worthy value are not “contributing” fast enough to support the ever growing need to incorporate more co-workers working to parasitically feed off of the producers, those in power on top of the rat heap can just simply add zeros to their National Bank FUND account, in the National Interest of course.

People producing products worthy of parasitic interest use a device that is demanded and supplied by people producing products worthy of parasitic interest, a device that can accurately account for the free exchange of valuable things traded by free traders in free markets.

That device that accurately accounts for the free exchange of valuable things traded by free traders in free markets is whatever is the current highest quality and lowest cost product on the free market.

When the demand is a device to accurately account for the free exchange of valuable things traded by free traders in free markets, the supply by one volunteer producer of a competitive product will enter the market with a supplied valuable product with a known quality, or a soon to be known quality, and a known or soon to be known cost, and the force that forces the market to force one supplier to improve the quality of their product and lower the cost of their product is called free competition in free markets, or simply called liberty.

The current highest quality and lowest cost producers of the device for currently accounting accurate exchanges of value gains the most market share which causes power to flow like a current from those who want the highest quality and lowest cost device to those suppliers who supply that highest quality and lowest cost product. The supplier with the highest quality and lowest cost product currently can afford to stay in the currency business, currently supplying the current product, to those who currently demand, and will not accept anything less, than the highest quality and lowest cost currency.

How does one tell which currency supplier is currently supplying the highest quality and lowest cost currency at any given time, any given day, any place on Earth?

Who, on the other hand, demands a currency that will cost users of the currency the most cost charged to the user of the currency and the user of the currency will suffer greater loss the longer the user of the currency is used by the user of the currency? In other words who demands the lowest quality and highest cost currency instead of the highest quality and lowest cost currency for their daily use of currency?

Who demands a currency that steadily increases in value (such as the power to purchase) while demanding a currency that steadily decreases in cost?

Lost?

Who demands a currency that steadily decreases in value and at the same time who demands a currency that steadily increases in cost?

Are you falling deeper into despair?

Electricity is an example of a currency that has steadily increased in value while the cost of electricity has steadily declined, as proven by the number of people demanding and the number of people in competition to meet that demand; even in markets controlled by very powerful dictators running very powerful dictatorships.

If you think that the above data, messages, language, words, symbols, concepts, ideas, as reasoned out logically are attempts to describe MONEY, then you may want to expand your thinking, get out of the despair box.

LAW is a currency. Without the advantages of high quality and low cost LAW currency, all the other markets are criminal in nature, because natural laws dictate that criminals will increase in number as the rate of pay flowing to criminals increase, up until the point at which the criminals eat all the people who produce stuff worth stealing, including children.