I've been working, so less study on Voluntary Mutual Defense.
Also, the Virus Fraud (global crime) has inspired study in that area: down that rabbit hole.
How about an analogy?
If government is the process by which people voluntarily end crime, by discovering and dealing with criminals, so as not to feed them, so as not to allow crime to flourish and grow, then fake government would be the "final solution" to the government problem as seen by those who will be criminals.
As in the saying: The best way to rob a bank is to own one.
[amazon.com]
The social body in the natural state produces anti-crime devices that seek out and contain the few criminals who will be criminals no matter what state the natural social body is currently at in regards to health.
A very healthy social body is made up of very independent, self-policing, self-defending, individual cells, and any criminal invaders can't get a foothold in that healthy social body. No one feeds the criminals in a healthy social body.
The very few strongly willed criminal individuals who invade a healthy social body can target and consume or destroy a few of the weakest members of the healthy social body despite all current efforts by all the individuals in the healthy social body. Children, old people, sick people, can present strongly willed criminals with the opportunity, the access, to consume them, by enslavement, consuming them a little bit at a time, or all at once in an orgy of murderous criminal activity. That can still happen even in a healthy social body, but not for long.
Then the healthy body produces agents that discover the strongly willed, individual, criminals acting all alone in a criminal enterprise in which the criminal consumes the targets preyed upon by the predator. Those agents, on their own authority, are warranted to discover the facts that matter in the case, and the predator is then brought before the healthy social body to be processed in such a manner as to first offer the criminal a way to turn from crime, as crime clearly does not pay in a health social body, not while the social body can effectively defend even the weakest individuals that make up the healthy social body. Offer help first.
If the invader, predator, criminal consumer of less healthy individuals will not turn from crime, then the social body is tasked with the power to decide, unanimously, the fate of the willfully destructive individual, the one at war with a healthy social body. The one serial consumer of healthy or less healthy members of the social body demonstrates an incapacity to refuse to self-police, and the social body responds with a unanimous verdict concerning the incorrigible lone gunman criminal. The lone career criminal, insane with a lust for destruction, proving to be incapable of peaceful, productive, sustainable existence within a social body is processed by that manner known as government: voluntary mutual defense, the law of the land, trial by jury, the common law, legem terrae.
If on the other hand one criminal gains control of an area of the formerly healthy social body, invading that social body and enslaving healthy, or less healthy members of the social body, and forming a collective power of cooperating predators preying on – consuming – members of the healthy body, then that gang of criminals will cost the social body dearly. That criminal cabal will extract a tax on the social body, a tax that will destroy the social body if the extortion payment is collected by the criminal invader of the healthy social body. The costs charged to the social body will increase exponentially, taxing the formerly healthy social body, warranting ever greater expenses taken from productive capacity, power now spent on defending healthy and less healthy members of the social body, against the powers that are growing, the growing powers that consume the health of the social body one step at a time. Once the criminal group is capable of convincing the healthy members of the social body that the criminal group is the cure, and not the disease, the fate of the formerly healthy social body is sealed. Each effort, each payment, thought to be an injection of defensive power, is instead an injection of even greater harm done to each member of the formerly healthy social body.
One former healthy member of the social body at a time is taken from the power supplied to the health of the social body, turned instead to power the predator, invader, group.
What happens when the government of the healthy social body is turned from the goal of defending against crime and is instead a power knowable as subsidized slavery?
What happens when a sickness is misdiagnosed and instead of treating the sickness the misdiagnosed illness inspires the sick to inject themselves with even greater causes of even more deadly diseases?
What happens when investments voluntarily transferred to reach the goal of crime prevention are transfers of power that go directly to the worst criminals ever to disgrace the human gene pool?
If a virus (exosome) is the bodies method of processing toxins, and the “doktor” prescribes toxins as a cure for the misdiagnoses, will the “doktor” get a larger or smaller bank account for his part in the organized effort to mismanage the social body? Will the “doktor” self-inject the same false cure?
1
Be part of the movement!
Welcome to the community for those who value free speech, evidence and civil discourse.Create your free account
1 comment
Feel free to reply to any comment by clicking the "Reply" button.With modern technology, we have evolved from a world of scarcity to one of abundance.
Every physical problem should be trending downward.
Every psychological benefit should be trending upward.
Any deviation from those patterns is caused by human corruption.
SupraLibrix
Level 7
Apr 12, 2020
1
In this IDW (Slug?) Group the idea is to process these facts that matter.
Deviations (by deviants?) from reasonable, logical, patterns of individual choices for better standards of living and lower costs of living - the natural order - constitute a cancer (virus?), and therefore a clear and present danger, to all life on earth.
Each individual enemy of each other individual enemy at war with the natural order of life - patterns of behavior - belong in a category, or set, of unique individuals. To earn a place in that category, that set, an individual must think and act according to predictable, known, patterns: patterns that constitute the behavior that willfully destroys life, as the saying goes "with malice aforethought."
In the past, the destructive category of individuals has been labeled with a word (in many languages) to accurately identify precisely why someone belongs in that specific category. In America, that word was: felon.
Someone at war with society, someone thinking insane thoughts with a corrupted brain, and someone determined to destroy life at all cost, someone incorrigible, was known as a felon.
Someone who lies pathologically, someone making false statements (under oath?) to escape a just sentence, proving beyond a reasonable doubt that each lie told is a device used by the felon merely to gain access to more victims, time and time again, is someone by his own choice, proven not by his words but proven by his actions, to be outside of the law, outside voluntarily.
Once the criminals took over the government, the words used by the defenders had to be changed, for the same reasons just explained in the last paragraph.
The idea here in this group is to reestablish law in America and to reach that goal there is a mountain of lies to be avoided, so as to discover the facts that matter in this case.
A lawful thought and a lawful act results in a pattern of behavior whereby the words used by those who defend accurately account for the actions performed by the defenders.
If that pattern is employed by the defenders the investments of consumable power spent toward defense will defend and felons (real, not false) will find fewer and fewer opportunities to gain access to victims. Crime will no longer pay so well at first, and not at all once the goal is reached in time and place.
Why would defenders true to their word ever start sweeping the bottom step first? Why would defenders true to their word ever expend precious consumable power treating symptoms rather than causes, in a misguided effort to prove a misdiagnosis as if falsehood could become a fact if enough people are lead down the same false path?
My hope is to help enough people see the clear turn from fact to fiction in American history, so as then to pick up the lawful path that was left behind in that valuable history of JUST exactly what happens to people who take that wrong path.
The unlawful path, as the evidence clearly shows, is the involuntary path.
The lawful path, as clearly as sunlight illuminates the power of vision, is the voluntary path.
That voluntary path is documented in such efforts as a Declaration of Independence and a Bill of Rights.
As clearly as the voluntary path is documented in those 2 documents, so it is as unclear that the opposite criminal path is documented in the criminal Constitution of 1789.
Case in point:
"deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed"
"To provide for calling forth the militia to execute the laws of the union, suppress insurrections and repel invasions:"
Two cases in American history serve to prove this point, to clearly stand in the light, voluntary - consent - of the governed, as those in the darkness of falsehood enslave and then make the slaves pay for their own enslavement: subsidized slavery, are Shays's Rebellion before the 1789 coup, and The Whiskey Rebellion after the criminals tookover.
Far from merely a lesson in history, the idea here is to try the case, to know the law, and then prove that the law was abandoned, and therefore a cause of the eventual coup (failure to defend) was that abandonment of the law, which could have been, should have been, a success instead. The idea is to prove that what could have and should have worked then - employment of the law - cannot be, and will not be a repeat mistake now.
Recent Visitors 2
Photos 19 More
Posted by Josf-KelleyWanted for Treason That is all for lack of intelligence and moral conscience.
Posted by Josf-KelleyBorrowed from another IDW post is the pictured meme.
Posted by Josf-KelleyReal Reality A few people have purchased the exclusive power to add zeros to their Bank account balance, and they accomplish this feat by borrowing their spending from anyone who can produce ...
Posted by HeresiarchWhy you should close Social Media accounts you no longer use. (I shut down my LinkedIn account immediately)
Posted by HeresiarchI taught my daughter to shoot at ten years old. Now she's passing on the lessons she learned.
Posted by HeresiarchIt's taken us years to rehabilitate the soil on our Better Than Organic farmlet.
Posted by Josf-KelleyThat is a complex process viewed simplistically in two directions that appear, in simple form, to be opposites.
Posted by Josf-KelleyThe level of brainwashing or mind control, or spirit control, or body control, or behavior control is demonstrably on a sub-conscious level and it runs very deep.
Posted by HeresiarchHow do you sacrifice children?
Posted by HeresiarchHow's that Police State workin' out for y'all?
Posted by Josf-KelleyFrom a source:
Posted by Josf-KelleyTrump says Pence can reject criminal votes.
Posted by Josf-KelleyFrom another IDW post: Roadmap to re-inauguration:
Posted by Josf-KelleyAt a Pennsylvania State Hearing, widespread voter and election fraud is reported by witness testimony.
Posted by Josf-KelleyThe following link is immediately censored from Facebook, as I press the enter button, a warning page loads.
Posted by Josf-KelleyI was banished (for speaking the truth to power) from Culture War (IDW topics) and occasionally I am presented with posts in my feed that lead to that exclusive group, so I can't enter, and a I can't ...