2009151600Tu SOCIALIST WEALTH REDISTRIBUTION IS COMMON THEFT: No government can give anyone anything it hasn’t first appropriated (stolen) under color of law from its rightful owner(s). The truth of Socialism can be summed up in two words or less. In polite language (if it can be considered polite) it’s Legislated Theft (Legislated Theft Under Force of Law).

Put another way, a (1) person steals the property of another it’s theft plain & simple. What Socialism asks you to believe is that if two or more people together decide to steal a persons property it’s no longer theft – it’s Wealth Redistribution & justified. That’s all Socialist Communism is – it’s Wealth Redistribution. Or to rephrase it as Socialist/Communism does: “From those according to their ability (to have earned it); to those according to their need (not willing to earn for themselves).”

Anything that you possess (it therefore follows) you must have gotten at the expense of some other person that doesn’t possess it. This is the same Communist/Feminism rationalization that Man’s strength must’ve been acquired at the expense of woman – how else could it be they reason? Therefore Man owes woman the fruits of his labor(s)? But if the strong has an obligation to the weak & incompetent doesn’t that mean that the beautiful also have an obligation to the unattractive & inept? Hence the phrase: “A woman’s beauty is her strength; a man’s strength is his beauty.”

Wealth Redistribution(s) such as UBI (Universal Basic Income) & Alimony etc. are the theft of Man’s strength transferring it to those to whom it doesn’t belong. So where is the equal & opposite reciprocal Wealth Redistribution (theft) of woman’s beauty being transferred to Man?

For some strange reason (call it a personal quirk) I had the idea that equality meant not being inherently or genetically obligated to someone else? I mean, it was my understanding that Nature’s Scales were not to be replaced by Socialism’s Scales as that would be a crime against Nature? And after all, Nature is like the rain that falls on the righteous & unrighteous equally – doesn’t it? Or is there one gender more equal than the other?

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Mathew 5:45 “That ye may be the children of your Father which is in heaven: for he maketh his sun to rise on the evil and on the good, and sendeth rain on the just and on the unjust.” (kjv)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

Posted by: StudioBrule Sep 15, 2020
“Man Forced to Pay Alimony to Ex-Girlfriend - TFF Episode 125”