@Haraldson

Correct. I don't recall where I read it - it might have been a James Lindsay analysis - but according to CRT, if you are white you are a racist. Period. No discussion. And you will always be a racist. But you can mitigate the harm your racism does by being "anti-racist," which in their vernacular, means "anti-Whiteness."

In other words, it's not enough for you to have an attitude of tolerance and inclusivity; if you do not help CRT activists tear down "white society" then you're still the enemy.

It blows my mind that people willingly sign up for this as the gospel truth.

@Alysandir Suppose it were guaranteed you were going to Hell. God doesn't like the way you look and He's decided there's no way you can ever be good enough to go to Heaven.

If that were the case, how would you live your life? You would have no incentive to be good because it would be guaranteed that you would be punished no matter how good you were.

That's where Whites are right now. The sooner they realize that, the better. Whites have ZERO incentive to play along with this #antiWhite, CRT dogmatism. Therefore, we have nothing to lose by being racist. In fact, we might even be better off as racists because we would be acting as a collective, advocating for our own interests, with little to no money/effort wasted on altruism extended to outside groups who hate us anyway.

Call it ZuzecaSape's Wager:

1. If society doesn't automatically think you're racist, it may or may not be beneficial to be a racist. We'll call the odds 50/50, even tho racism didn't seem to hold back any society in history.

2. If society does automatically label you a racist, regardless of whether you are or not, then it NEVER pays to be antiracist; you're just reinforcing the system that oppresses you. However, in such a society, being an actual racist is advantageous. You're hip to your oppressor's game and can actively work to circumvent and defeat it. In such a society, the antiRacist is a 0, but the actual racist has a better than even chance of success because he's actively engaged defeating his oppressors.

@ZuzecaSape

You raise some interesting questions.

Suppose it were guaranteed you were going to Hell. God doesn't like the way you look and He's decided there's no way you can ever be good enough to go to Heaven. If that were the case, how would you live your life?

Well, I cannot speak for anyone but myself, but I would hope that I would continue to live my life as I always have, under the theory of: if I am to be damned, then let me be damned for who I am.

But then, I am also of the belief that man cannot earn salvation, they can only ask for forgiveness and hope God's in a good mood that day; so my reality is not altogether different than the scenario you propose. If I have no means of earning salvation for myself, and can commit boundless sins before my death so long as I am contrite and asking of forgiveness upon death, should I then live a life full of sin?

I couldn't even if I wanted to, because to me, wrong is wrong. It doesn't matter if God Almighty forgives my transgressions, it's still wrong TO ME. It's a crime against my own principles and values, meaning that if I am going to commit a wrong, it better be for an important reason, because I'm going to have to live with that act the rest of my life.

That's where Whites are right now. The sooner they realize that, the better. Whites have ZERO incentive to play along with this #antiWhite, CRT dogmatism. Therefore, we have nothing to lose by being racist.

Except that wrong is wrong.

I do not mean to belittle your assertion here; I completely understand what it is you're saying and the gravity of the warning that CRT activists SHOULD be listening to. Because you're right; a lot of people will stop trying to be better people and this will turn into a full-blown culture war if not a shooting war.

But wrong is still wrong. Just because people think I'm a fascist, or a homophobe, or a white supremacist, or a misogynist, or that I'm toxic, or any of the other things I'm called carelessly, does NOT mean that I should sink to the level of proving them right. That's not who I am.

I am not going to allow the sum of all that I am to be distilled down to a color, whose meaning is provided by someone else who doesn't even like what they think the color represents. Nor will I do that to anyone else.

If society does automatically label you a racist, regardless of whether you are or not, then it NEVER pays to be antiracist; you're just reinforcing the system that oppresses you.

On this, I am in full agreement. I think people of all colors and cultures are joining the anti-racist bandwagon either because they don't know any better or because they are afraid to be singled-out as a dissident in a time where to be a dissident can mean losing your job and having your addressed published on social media.

But that's the only way forward. And to that end, I do believe I will lose my job - I'm already taking steps to soften the blow if and when it comes. And I'm mentally preparing myself for life in a country with a social currency system that I will almost certainly always be at the bottom of. Maybe I'll be lined up and shot one day; who's to say it can't happen?

I have to be true to myself. And no matter what they say, I am not a racist. I am not a misogynist. I am not a homophobe. I am not any ist or phobe. And I won't let them make me one.

@Alysandir Except that wrong is wrong.

Are you suggesting it's wrong to be racist? We might have different definitions of racism. My brand of "racism" is motivated by love for my Volk and culture. Any "hate" that manifests from that is a defensive reaction against threats to the Volk. But I also acknowledge statistically significant genotypic and phenotypic differences between human populations (aka, races) and am opposed to race-mixing on the grounds that it's a threat to the Volk.

As for me, I'm an atheist, so I neither have incentive or disincentive to be good or bad based on a possible afterlife. A better example might have been "What if you were to be thrown in jail," but I thought that too immediate. I guess you answered that question anyway tho. The thing the keeps me from being a serial killer rapist is the disincentive of punishment and the fact I'm not a psychopath. I respect the rights of others given they respect my rights, which brings up an interesting wrinkle in that I'm a fierce defender of absolute free speech, but I've had my speech policed. Therefore, I have no moral reservations about returning tit-for-tat, limiting the speech of the censors if I had the power to do so. Two wrongs may not make a right, but it damned sure makes it even.

@ZuzecaSape

Are you suggesting it's wrong to be racist?

For me? Yes.

But I...am opposed to race-mixing on the grounds that it's a threat to the Volk.

Which I would consider to be wrong. But I don't believe I have the right to impress my principles upon you. I can only try to convince you why I think it's wrong and you do with that information whatever you think it's worth.

As for me, I'm an atheist, so I neither have incentive or disincentive to be good or bad based on a possible afterlife.

Which, not to be disrespectful, is probably why you do not accept my point of view.

@vangr Quit being a pussy and steal it. That way you get the #CocaCola taste you love while fucking over the Woka-Cola corporation. It's a win-win.

@Haraldson This is why I drink only distilled water or pure grain alcohol.