Obviously, central banks are all forwarding the narrative of globalism. I believe that social media, although it remains in the private sector, and because of that, is contracted to do things the intelligence community cannot legally do, such as track everybody's whereabouts. Social media, of course, has global tentacles. Now, it seems they have been recruited to help forward the globalist narrative by blocking contrary information under the guise of it being "fake news".

The agenda has been set and convincing the instant multibillionaires of the tech industry of how much power they now have and how valuable that power can be to, essentially, not only save the planet but craft a whole new sustainable environment and Utopian world is an easy task. After all one just has to appeal to their innate human characteristic to want to help.

LOL Suckers!

I suspect it is about power almost exclusively, individual liberties and broad democracy were only wrestled away from our superiors a couple hundred years ago, they haven't forgotten, we have.

Broad democracy is messy and difficult and in their minds the masses are incapable of intelligent decisions and are more suited to being subjects. Furthermore there are too many of us and it is their belief that finite resources will not support us all in the long term, there is no reason they should have to do without so as you might well guess the doing without is for others. The very rich think in a different time horizon, they are frequently preserving their wealth for several generations into the future, it makes their crimes and misbehaviors much more difficult to judge in the present.

My impression is that the model most preferred by the UN globalist types is fascist/ feudalism, by which I mean the elite/ oligarchs will be run and own everything as a partnership with government through a patchwork of regulation, taxation and cooperation.

His belief in the inherent superiority of his kind is evident as is their contempt for the rest of us, and in his impossible Marxist mind of zero sum game more for him and less for us is perfectly logical. And we should naturally submit to his scheme since he would see it as in our self interest to preserve his position of authority.

I expect the logical outcome to this inevitable class war should provide a handsome bounty of the likes of Mr Carney and that might be the only part we can all look forward to.

That the world's oligarchs are working with each other to return citizens to subjects is of little surprise. What I would like to know is WHY they've elected to do it.

Oh sure, they claim it's for the benefit of climate change, but we all know that's bull. If they were truly worried about climate change they'd invest heavily in nuclear power, which is the only real alternative that can compete with traditional coal-fired plants. No, the climate change narrative is a smokescreen.

Me personally? I think they're very worried about the non-Western world catching and surpassing them, and then they are no longer in a position to call the shots. Thus, they require complete solidarity from the Western world in order to act in opposition to non-Western interests.

I have always loved (not) the arrogant ignorance of our superiors:

"[I]t does not make a promise to make the lives of ordinary people better, but worse. Carney’s Brave New World will be one of severely constrained choice, less flying, less meat, more inconvenience and more poverty: “Assets will be stranded, used gasoline powered cars will be unsaleable, inefficient properties will be unrentable,” he promises."

Ending in the following superior hubis of the ignorant elitest:

"However, he assured his radical comrades that he would retain control of “the commanding heights” of heavy industry. Carney’s plan is to control the global economy by seizing the commanding heights of finance, not by nationalization but by exerting non-democratic pressure to divest from, and stop funding, fossil fuels. The private sector is to become a partner in imposing its own bondage. This will be do-it-yourself totalitarianism. Indeed, companies in our one-party ESG state are already pleading like show-trial defendants, making suicidal net-zero commitments, lest banks cut them off."

May we all be spared the brilliant prognistications of the "superior" mental midgets.