21.08.15.0200Su RAPE BY DECEPTION & PRESUMPTION OF TRUTH:

RAPE BY DECEPTION: I would pose the question: Where are the dividing lines between TOILETRIES - GROOMING - & COSMETICS? It’s easy to recognize that Toiletries & Grooming paraphernalia are intrinsically inextricably connected. But Cosmetics on the other hand are things (apparatus included) used to quite literally CHANGE ONES APPEARANCE TO THE POINT OF DISGUISING ONES APPEARANCE.

Male humans are HEREDITARILY visual creatures likely as a result of thousands of years as hunters & gatherers. They are drawn to LURES visually just like any other predator – fish being an excellent example.

LURES: At what point does using LURES (be they cosmetics, wealth or status etc.) become RAPE BY DECEPTION?

I for one would be more than happy, even pleased, for Rape by Deception to be enshrined in law – equally of course. Why? Because many many more men are raped day in & day out around the world by deception – PLEASE DO BRING IT ON!

&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&
AUTOMATICALLY GUILTY: I would posit that men as a sex are raped astronomically more than women as a sex! But the gynocentrism of society legally enshrining a tenet to “BELIEVE THE WOMAN” is tantamount to reciprocally enshrining a tenet of “AROMATIC MALE GUILT.”

CORRUPTED THOUGHT PROCESSES: Feminist theory is being taught as factual perverting the history of humanity thereby perverting any judicial decisions that cannot escape the taint of Marxist/Socialism. HERE’S WHERE IT’S HARD TO SWALLOW! No one, let alone a Judge want to even consider that their decision making faculties have been corrupted by anything including Marxist/Socialism. But if they (any Judge) subscribes to Feminist Theory their thought processes have already been corrupted.

TRUTH FINDING: Though polygraphs are admittedly not what one would want, they are the best humanity has for FINDING OF FACTS in that they’re not partial in any way. Men as a sex would be substantially better off would polygraphs become admissible as evidence in matters before Family Courts. Admittedly such admissions may go either way for men, but that would be a great deal better for him than automatically “BELIEVE THE WOMAN.” Seems to me that refusal to allow polygraph evidence would go a long way towards determining the truthfulness of both parties in a dispute before Family Courts?

PS. Who are these fishermen that by all these bright shinny lures, attach them to other fishing paraphernalia, then drag them around in oceans, lakes, rivers even streams to show off to the other fishermen WITHOUT A HOOK ON SAID LURE? Have we discovered a new classification of insanity – fishermen insanity?

PS2. Do fish get caught, raped or both? Which ever it is be sure to believe the fish – right?

Posted by: Men Are Good ~ Apr 30, 2021
“Varieties of Rape Fraud and the Media's Narrative - Regarding Men”