2204150500F MARRIAGE IS VICARIOUSLY LIVING FOR WOMEN (ONLY) THAT AFFORDS THEM A SUPER LAYER OF IMPUNITY?

Now ask yourself what sort of ‘impunity’ does marriage afford man – any man? If you’ve discerned such an impunity afforded men by marriage the rest of mankind would surely like to know all about it?

For instance, it’s not that a wife is can’t (barred) from testifying against her husband – we men just like to think that she that she wouldn’t testify against us given that she can’t be FORCED to testify against us. Men just don’t like, they even refuse, to entertain the very idea that the woman they vowed to love doesn’t actually love them in return – reciprocate their love?

Given the outrageous privilege afforded womankind throughout the entire history of humanity, WHY has it, almost, universally been men that have been responsible for the creation(s) we now see as civilization?

Postmodernism is a blanket term for women’s way of thinking – the hindsight criticism that always, unfortunately, tends to come from the ‘can’t do people’ of the accomplishments of the ‘can do people?’ And even worse, given the universal impunity afforded womankind shouldn’t their history be overflowing with creative achievements while men’s be minuscule if existing at all?

Too be crude, sh%tting out 2.1+ babies per woman has never amounted to appropriate recompence for the extreme hardship(s) burdened upon mankind collectively and/or individually? Is there a single thing that a stay at home wife does that she would not have to do with or without a husband? I mean, would she not have to engage in food preparation for herself? Would she not have to have to vacuum and/or sweep, wash her dirty dishes and perform general housekeeping chores for her own existence? Just take an objective look at the mankind’s abuse of women: She does want to wash dishes for herself – man creates and maintains electric dishwashers for her. She doesn’t want to wash her clothes – man creates and maintains electric clothes washers for her. She doesn’t want to hang out her clothes to dry – man creates and maintains electric clothes dryers for her. If she’s afraid, mankind goes off to war to protect her – dying in the millions! The list is unbelievably endless! I know of no admonishment that women be even capable of reciprocating the love of a man? Adam did come close to such an admonition to man(kind) at Genesis 2:24, but I don’t see mention of it being reciprocated? Where Pankhurst and other feminists get/got the idea that something was/is owed to woman by men is way far outside the reaches of comprehension? Men hold no duty to womankind – if I’m wrong, please to enlighten me?

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Genesis 2:23 And Adam said, This is now bone of my bones, and flesh of my flesh: she shall be called Woman, because she was taken out of Man. 24 Therefore shall a man leave his father and his mother, and shall cleave unto his wife: and they shall be one flesh.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

‘WHAT IS A WOMAN’ has been a common question in the news of late. I would like to posit that that question is constructed all wrong? Shouldn’t that question actually be WHAT A WOMAN IS NOT instead? And the answer to that second formulated question is: NOT A CHILD? It rather looks like society has an extreme shortage of women of late?

Please do correct any errors you discern, thanks in advance?

PS1. If the United States Government can see its way to pay for sexual reassignment surgery, why then can they not also see their way to female conscription, provide free hysterectomies and mastectomies – especially since they’ve decided to forsake their actual duty of birthing at least 2.1+ children with those body parts given them to replenish the human population – 2.1 children per woman being just the replacement level? This idea that the Earth is overcrowded is complete nonsense propaganda by mentally deranged feminists?

PS2. Feminism is MARXIST POSTMODERN NIHILISM?

Posted by: Today I Found Out ~ Feb 21, 2019
“The White Feather and What Really Caused WWI”

Posted by: Michael Davies ~ May 25, 2020
“Shame and Symbolism - the White Feather Campaign”

Posted by: WomenagainstfeminismUK ! Sep 24, 2015
“History of WW1, the 1st feminist wave, white feather, Emmeline and Christabel Pankhurst.”

Posted by: Quantum of Conscience ~ Feb 4, 2021
“Old School Propaganda - The White Feather Society”

1. the rejection of all religious and moral principles, in the belief that life is meaningless.

Similar: negativity, cynicism, pessimism, rejection.

▪ extreme skepticism maintaining that nothing in the world has a real existence.

▪ the doctrine of an extreme Russian revolutionary party c. 1900 which found nothing to approve of in the established social order.

Powered by Oxford Dictionaries