BLM and Antifa are essentially Nazis. Is that confusing because they are supposed to be communists? BLM leaders claim to be trained Marxists. Antifa are supposed to be Antifascist, i.e., anti right wing extremist. The Democrats are anti right wing extremism. Thus, they are in league with the communist organizations, BLM and Antifa. There is a seeming incongruity here that needs to be reconciled. It is all just words and political manipulation. Simply put, there are no right wing extremists. Is that confusing? We are told that Nazism and Fascism are right wing ideologies, and even the KKK, embraced and supported by the Democrat party until the sixties, are also somehow a right wing movement. David Duke is a white supremacist right wing extremist, doncha know! And the Democrat Party can never be associated with being supportive of white supremacist extremism.

How did the Democrats divorce themselves from the KKK and shift white supremacy to the right side of the political spectrum? And now everything, absolutely everyone, on the right side of the political spectrum seems to be considered white supremacy extremists - even parents against indoctrination of their children.The right are all racists and deplorables. The DOJ better keep an eye on them. Somehow they missed this white supremacist right wing extremist in New York?

Something is not adding up here?

Anyway, getting back to the Democrat party and their shifting of white supremacy to all things Republican. In the fifties, President Eisenhower - a Republican, had congress introduce a civil rights bill that would have addressed some of the racism that did exist in some areas of America that supported policies like segregation. The Democrats voted against it. Then, in '65, Johnson introduced his Civil Rights bill, got it passed in congress and bragged "it would have Blacks voting Democrat for the next 200 years." although he didn't say "Blacks". Up until recently the Dems have been able to buy the Black vote by pretending compassion but as Blacks have increasingly become aware, the Democrats only care about getting their vote while Black communities are being impoverished and alienated. The first Black President had a disdain for America and promised to "fundamentally transform" it. From the Clinton era on the Democrats promoted and celebrated the Black community and encouraged it to create its own culture. Not thinking a course of action like that would foster resentment for the all-inclusive, melting pot that was supposed to be American culture, so it might be a little divisive. Well, maybe they knew that and liked a little dissent where they could create some chaos in society and take advantage of it. You know, the old "never let a good crisis go to waste". Under Obama they got plenty of help from a weaponized intelligence community and an already partisan media that turned journalism into a parroting of the left wing narrative. Obama to transform the nation did nothing to curtail the growth of BLM and Antifa, both of which are, once again, communist movements supposedly opposing right wing white supremacy extremists. Today that includes anyone right of Marx.

The contemporary political spectrum, along with Johnson's Civil Rights Act, helped the Dems separate themselves from the KKK - those right wing racist extremists. Somehow communism is less extreme than right wing extremism. Communism is never condemned as much as Nazism or Fascism. In order to create political division and tension the two factions have to exist. But are they opposites? Or are they both just extreme ideologies that struggle for complete political domination? When brought into proximity one will attempt to annihilate the other because there is no toleration of political opposition. They are both totalitarian ideologies. Should they then be left-wing ideologies because of their similarities. Or they both could be right wing ideologies but certainly they are not opposites. They are just in opposition to any political view but theirs. They will even form coalitions to fight free-market capitalist republics. We see this occurring in Canada with the pro-communist Liberal Party in league with the socialist New Democrat Party supporting each other to climb on board the WEF global initiative and sell the nation's sovereignty to those interests. All this, while purporting to aid the National sovereignty of Ukraine. The US, Canada and other western nations all care so much about the national sovereignty of Ukraine while impoverishing their own citizens, opening their borders and selling their own national sovereignty to globalist interests. If you are confused by that or the various ideologies of totalitarianism that similarly want sole power and control but are politically poised as polar opposites when they should all be considered as very similar, then you aren't alone.

Considering the government's proclivity for false flags and instantly spewing their freedom-restricting talking points whenever a convenient event occurs, coupled with the weird grammatical errors in the so called "manifesto," I withhold judgment on the source of the shooter's motivations. When Ray Epps is prosecuted for incitement to riot and the BLM and Antifa autonomous zone leaders are prosecuted for insurrection and sedition, then I will believe there is rule of law once again in America. But this shooter is just too convenient in time and location for the powers that be to use as a distraction from the huge revelation released by True the Vote and Dinesh D'sousa.