Its a very old idea. They didn't call it carbon neutral goal but balanced load back in the 1930's. that's how long they have been working on this insanity.
Here is a section from Technocracy rising - the Trojan horse of global transformation, 2014 by Patrick M. Wood
"There is no doubt that Technocracy, Inc. intended to be an agent of change for a new social structure, although there was nothing that qualified either Scott or Hubbert to play the role of sociologists. That did not hinder them in the slightest. Simply put, they believed that the actions of human beings, both direct and indirect, were the root cause of societal problems and that they were directly related to biology, climate and natural resources. The absence of enlightened scientific management would doom mankind to certain destruction. It is not coincidental that the most visible and manipulative modern agents of change - Sustainable Development, Agenda 21, global warming, the U.N.’s green economy and the modern ecology movement, etc. - all hold to the same underlying assumptions.
Scott’s version of Technocracy was intensely focused on energy. Whether human or mechanical, all work involves the expenditure of energy. Humans and beasts of burden eat food, and machines consume electricity, gas, oil, etc. This emphasis on energy was most certainly fine-tuned by the presence of M. King Hubbert who was a well-educated and aspiring geophysicist trained in energy-related science. In 1955, Hubbert went on to create his “Peak Oil Theory”, commonly known as Hubbert’s Peak, that stated that known reserves of oil would peak and go into decline as demand and consumption increased to an unsustainable level. It is also not coincidental that Hubbert is often revered as a “founding father” of the modern environmental and Sustainable Development movements.
According to Scott and Hubbert, the distribution of energy resources and the goods they produce must be monitored and measured in order for their system to work. Every engineer knows that you cannot control what you cannot monitor and measure. Both Scott and Hubbert were keenly aware that constant monitoring and precise measuring would enable them to control society with scientific precision.
It is not surprising then that the first five out of seven requirements for Technocracy were:
In 1934, such technology did not exist. Time was on the Technocrat’s side, however, because this technology does exist today, and it is being rapidly implemented to do exactly what Scott and Hubbert specified, namely, to exhaustively monitor, measure and control every facet of individual activity and every ampere of energy delivered and consumed in the life of such individual. The end result of centralized control of all society was clearly spelled out on page 240.
The end-products attained by a high-energy social mechanism on the North American Continent will be:
(a) A high physical standard of living, a high standard of public health, (ç a minimum of unnecessary labor, a minimum of wastage of non-replaceable resources, an educational system to train the entire younger generation indiscriminately as regards all considerations other than inherent ability - a Continental system of human conditioning.
The achievement of these ends will result from a centralized control with a social organization built along functional lines… [Emphasis added]"
A New Religion Growing Out of Scientific Revelation
Alibaba ~ Jack Ma???? thought he was missing and his village was looking for him, and him missing his 13th booster brought his entire village to shame and lowered the collective score and now they receive less rations from the CCP and sell more of their girl babies to the sex trade tong