2206210500Tu FEMINIST SOCIALISM IS MORAL MENTAL CORRUPTION?

The same people that see no wrong in TAXATION OF UN-REALIZED GAINS are the same people that see no wrong with marriage entitling women to half a man’s UN-REALIZED POTENTIAL? They see nothing wrong because they’re mental faculties have already been corrupted by socialism. With their Stalinist math 2+2 will always equal 5.

They (socialists) come to these corrupted convoluted viewpoints simply by assessing that male humans are unfairly privileged relative to female humans. They rationalize that the reason(s) they haven’t accomplished or possess something, anything at all, there’s no limitation(s), must inevitably be because of male human privilege oppressing themselves (women).

Posted by: Wireless Philosophy
“CRITICAL THINKING - Fundamentals: Correlation and Causation”

Another evil terminology problem rearing its ugly head in society today is conflation of CRITICAL THEORY with CRITICAL THINKING by presuming that CORRELATION IS THE CAUSATION – when it may or may not be at all. Once again they may or may not be CORRELATED but definitely not the result of any particular CAUSATION? And as before, simply CORRELATING in no way even implies CAUSATION – it’s the same old fallacy at work yet again?

You are not poor simply because someone else is rich – that’s fallacy is a product of CRITICAL THEORY (Socialist Marxism to be exact) not CRITICAL THINKING.

A man is not successful or wealthy because of FEMINIST CRITICAL THEORY he’s successful or rich because of his CRITICAL THINKING – by doing his homework as it were.

Posted by: The Winto Centre
“Correlation vs Causation: A Brief Guide To Communicating Research”

FEMINIST THEORY is one of SOCIOLOGICAL THEORIES confronting humanity today – its CRITICAL THEORY not CRITICAL THINKING in any way. Putting forth a THEORY in any field including as an explanation for male human’s superior creativity as opposed to that of female humans is a prime example of the CORRELATION = CAUSATION FALLACY at work in academia today? Apples are apples and oranges will always be oranges – THERE’S NO CORRELATION TO BE FOUND IN FEMINIST THEORY. So how can there ever be CAUSATION discerned without a corresponding CORRELATION to begin with?

Confucius rightly advocated that male and female humans shouldn’t even be allowed to walk on the same side of any street. Apples and oranges are both fruit, BUT THEY CAN NEVER BE THE SAME?

Please do correct for me any errors that you discern – thanks in advance?

#LETSGOBRANDON ~ A Male-Feminst
#MGTOW (Men Going Their Own Way) an individualist philosophy of life – consider it?