2206230700Th MISOGYNY VS. MISANDRY?

I keep hear this un-refuted accusation of female ‘objectification’-- why is that?

Two men standing together on a street corner – one say to the other about a woman across the street: Isn’t she an angel? Now it’s obvious she’s not an angel – although she very well could be in many respects. Both men know that he meant that she’s beautiful – as it’s highly unlikely that either man personally knows her to be of supernatural origin or even as a messenger of some sort? Translated I suppose we could correctly say that his meaning was that her appearance was angelically (supernaturally) beautiful – quite a compliment, don’t you think?

The man above would be accused of ‘objectification’ by the jealous feminist standing close enough to hear the conversation – no doubt?

The question arises, is the man guilty of misogyny or is the feminist guilty of misandry – it has to be one or the other? What truly pisses men off is always being presumed guilty based solely on genitalia.

Instead of what feminist say a thing is it’s much more common that it’s not – that it’s the opposite instead? Do feminist truly think that female human are so highly situated above male humans that they’re no longer A PERSON PLACE OR THING (a noun) like male humans are? So much so that the ‘comparative adjective’ of ‘angelic’ is in some way a sin?

Is it not ‘misandry’ to tear down a man’s intent (good intent I might add) by sophistic-ally (deceptive language arguments) accusing him of ‘objectification’ as if to imply that the woman is above being a (person, place, or thing) noun as his lowly station in life relegates him to?

This disgusting aberration called feminism has gone so far as to return civilization to the long since days when people actually believed that eyesight touched what was being observed rather than merely being an anatomical absorption of light allowing the minds eye to produce a mental image.
For instance, common folk weren’t allowed to cast their gaze upon exalted dignitaries lest they assault them with their gaze – does ‘male gaze’ sound familiar of late?

I apologize to this poor woman, her video just happened in front of me while looking for something else. I was looking for a video commercial from long ago which included the most beautiful accented man I’ve ever heard come out of America – bar none. In the commercial he refereed to “EMMA’S THE SUPERLATIVE FLORIST”. If you could hear my atrocious hill-billy accent you’d understand my interest in preserving that bit of AMERICAN EXCEPTIONALISM?

The proof is in the pudding (not pudding people) real pudding, that feminism is a grossly misguided female supremacist movement of misandrous male hatred?

PS. Please do help me out. There’s a specific word, ancient word even, for feminist accusations of ‘male gaze’ however my vocabulary fails me at the moment. In long since or sense days royalty and the like really believed they could be touched by the gaze of the lowly peasantry – I just can’t remember the word for it right off?

Please do correct for me any errors that you discern – thanks in advance?

#LETSGOBRANDON ~ A Male-Feminst
#MGTOW (Men Going Their Own Way) an individualist philosophy of life – consider it?

Posted by: English with Emma - engVid
“English Grammar: Comparative Adjectives”