Political word manipulation

I just watched a Mark Dice video complaining about the conservative capitulation toward the LGBTQ++ community. It isn't a community really. They are just different groups of people that are on the sidelines of society that have reluctantly banded together for the purpose of achieving a sense f normalcy and inclusion within a cis-gendered society. I say "reluctantly" banded together because they have no real love of each other or reason to be connected other than their exclusion from that sense of societal "normalcy".

Of course, the LGBTQ++ movement will move the line. They want to feel a sense of normalcy. But it is like fitting a square peg into a round hole.

The biggest problem is in changing the vernacular, the language. Usually, when something is discovered or new or different a new word is invented to describe it. The LGBTQ++ community wishes to maintain the same vernacular but alter the definitions to be inclusive. They won't accept new words.

Marriage was defined as the union of a man and woman in matrimony. Gays want to adopt the language and call their unions marriage too, so there is no differentiation. As I said it gives them a sense of normalcy and inclusion in society.

Well, it seems they don't want us to recognize what the union of two men or two women in matrimony is, for example. It must remain a "marriage". We can't call it anything else - which is the farce. It can't be a partnership or union. It can't be called anything other than marriage. A trans-gender woman has to be called a woman with appropriate pronouns. This is a politically purposeful redefining of words.

Where this will end is not a happy place. People that are pushing this wordplay are purposely trying to incite division and the harder they push the more divisive it becomes until there is a backlash.

If new words were invented to describe things like gay marriage, which alters the definition of marriage, and is no longer the same concept, there will be resistance. now we are supposed to be diverse and inclusive and equitable. We no longer have a mutual understanding of what we are talking about. When we think we are getting a grasp of it, some other concept is changed that we have to adjust to. This changes the social structure. A new word would not. The old words were intended to be exclusive.Inventing new words would also not be inclusive because it identifies a new concept, something different. It would be a less challenging way to gain acceptance but it would always identify as outside the norm which is not what the LGBTQ++ community wants. They want to be the norm. Something they can never be. It's a denial of reality. A man cannot become pregnant. He cannot menstruate. A woman cannot produce sperm. In order to do these things we would have to alter the species. Is this where we are headed? If so, it is really a death sentence for the human race.