2208080030M OUT OF AFRICA?

Is there a reason for the reluctance to shine a light on historical Africa? Contrary to wokeism, this earth is nowhere near over populated. A look at unexplored regions stand proof willing and ready to disprove socialist lies of over population. I don’t claim to know Earth’s limits, but it’s sure not close at present. Look at it this way, if an area was once inhabited by humans, it can be re-inhabited by humans – it’s just common logic?

I would submit that Africa is called the dark continent only because no one wants to shine a torch on it – why is that? I would also submit that Africa is not alone in this neglect. Huge portions of South America go unchallenged historically? The thing that draws my attention to these two places is simply that we know they were once inhabited by fellow humans – yet they appear to be going deliberately overlooked?

The video linked hereto is about falsifying history in lieu of actually discovering it – lost heritage as it were for some fellow humans? Nothing I here say is to imply that we actually know the history of any group or culture -- in reality history is always up in the air like a coin toss. Cultures come and cultures have gone throughout human history – we shouldn’t be discounting anything that authentically presents itself?

Such as the ‘out of Africa theory’ currently disproving itself. Theories are just that theories – nothing more, nothing less? They’re someone’s opinion put forth to be disproved – and they are regularly. While Einstein’s theory may be a long time coming if ever it’s disproved – but it’s being worked on as we speak, as it should always be? But feminist theory is being acknowledged as fact when there’s no way it could be true.

A theory is a theory because it’s just someone’s opinion being put forth for constant scrutiny. I don’t even think peer reviewing is intended to supersede perpetual scrutiny?
As I heard someone say just today: science is never settled, it’s forever being challenged? In short, following the science is not all that reassuring to me – how bout you?

As Doctor Peterson pointed out, The Judaeo-Christian Bible is more than ‘truth’ it is the foundation upon which ‘truth’ can be constructed? (not a quote, best I could remember) That’s what sets it apart from other sources of wisdom? The only caveat I can see with consulting the Judaeo-Christian Bible is whether you are reflecting or projecting upon it? Because it’s not always going to tell you what you want to hear – it’d be concerning if it did?

A false history is not a history at all – least ways one that anyone should want? And blue eyed African natives with Neanderthal DNA markers does not mean some evil white men crept into Africa nefariously? It means that the ‘out of Africa’ theory is crumbling and human history isn’t as cut and dried as narrow minded people would like to think? It’s a crumbling theory as we speak, that’s all it is.

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Acts 17: 25 Neither is worshipped with men’s hands, as though he needed any thing, seeing he giveth to all life, and breath, and all things; 26 And hath made of one blood all nations of men for to dwell on all the face of the earth, and hath determined the times before appointed, and the bounds of their habitation; 27 That they should seek the Lord, if haply they might feel after him, and find him, though he be not far from every one of us:
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

“The truth is out there” it’s just a never ending journey?

Posted by: The Podcast of the Lotus Eaters ~ Oct 23, 2021
“What Is 'Black' History?”

Please do correct for me any errors that you discern – thanks in advance?

#LETSGOBRANDON ~ A Male-Feminist
#MGTOW (Men Going Their Own Way) an individualist philosophy of life.