Fitness is measured in reproductive success.
That is of course complicated by kin, group, and societal selection. As far as we know kin selection is the weakest of the three but still seems plausible.
What seems to be happening is a denial that society should have any say in sexual behavior. That is fundamentally at odds with physical reality. A society of humans will not survive anymore than an insect society without well organized reproduction. By well organized I don't mean under some authority such as a government but according to instinct and mores.
Physical reality of course is not the only consideration. Culture is fundamentally to human evolution and is in origin abstract. Abstract culture was the driving force behind human physical evolution. We don't have culture because we have large brains but culture allowed the evolution of large brains. Culture has even created a form of artificial eusociality we call civilization. Because of this civilization has played a role in fitness.
Unsurprisingly considering the nature of cultural evolution mores have considerable irrational aspects. Not as random perhaps as physical evolution but certainly not entirely by design.
Mores have a fitness test and while they are not directly tied to reproduction high fitness mores have a role in genetic replacement. For example gene replacement in ethnic Mongolian by Han Chinese genes. Mores survive as much by adaptation as design.
Consciously or otherwise people have recognized the role of mores in cultural fitness. Historically those mores that are successful have often been embodied at least to some extent in organized religion. Other means of mores transmission are laws and ethical standards. Which are important to cultural fitness is not as simple as ideologues propose.
The role that individual rights play in cultural fitness is a complex topic. Perhaps to be discussed later.
Gawd help I am siding with Rick.....
The bill will not become law. IF it were to, it would be rejected by the SCOTUS. I would certainly believe.
The people pushing this abomination lack KNOWLEDGE and understanding of Gender Identity disorders. I am NOT saying that there hasn't been a SERIOUS abdication by the medical community of their responsibilities and a MONSTROUS destruction unleashed upon teens - lots of people have to answer to the problems. BUT, kids are suffering. No, I am not talking about those under 10 or 11 - puberty is the issue. Prior to that, SOCIAL transition MIGHT be appropriate with well vetting therapists providing some guidance. Right now, the therapist community (and the greater medical community) is awash in woke medical malpractice.
Banning trans health care is CUTTING THE LEGS OFF SOMEONE BECAUSE THEY ARE BRUISED.
Those that support Taylor-Greene are ignorant. DANGEROUSLY ignorant.
I think you are reaching. What is wrong with allowing kids to become adults first before they decide to mutilate their own bodies? Why not just make it a law that a person must be 19 to make a decision over their own bodies? What is the rush to mutilate these children???