2208241100W LEAPING FROGS?

Using the South Pacific as staging for an allegory, During World War II it was rightly seen that simply bypassing certain islands, rather than suffer the military loses required to conquer them, was the advantageous way to winning the war? Put another way, they saw that bypassing some individual battles benefited the effort to win the war as a whole? Leap frogging certain problematic island fortresses saved the expenditure of lives a material necessary to win unnecessary individual battles?

What I’m getting at is, wouldn’t it be better to ‘leapfrog’ CRT (Critical Race Theory) and take a look at what’s behind it – that is, rather than expend all the effort necessary to appease perpetually unreasonable people?

The most critical battle, as I see it, is the hotly contended argument as to what kinds of hierarchies human society is made up of? To a Marxist, and by extension thereof CRT (Critical Race Theorists) contend that society is made up of Power Hierarchies? The opposing contention is that they’re made up of Competence (value) Hierarchies? This singular disagreement is what I, personally, see hidden behind all this CRT (Critical Race Theory) confusion – because only one can be correct? To be more concise, my contention is that the underlying disagreement is what sort of hierarchies human society is made up of – are they Power Hierarchies or are they Value Hierarchies?

CRT (Critical Race Theorists) is a Neo-Marxist ideology bent on black supremacy envisioning itself as contending with a mythical white supremacy? Much like Neo-Marxist feminism’s contention (s) against a mythical patriarchy of men? Both, or either, of which inevitably destined to descend into an Hobbesian Nightmare?

Now I happen to agree with Doctor Peterson that society is made up of Value Hierarchies (of competence) – how say you?

Posted by: The Podcast of the Lotus Eaters ~ Sep 15, 2021
“Critical Race Theorists are Lying About Critical Race Theory”

Please do correct for me any errors that you discern – thanks in advance?

#LETSGOBRANDON ~ A Male-Feminist.
#MGTOW (Men Going Their Own Way) an individualist philosophy of life.

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Hobbes·i·an
/ˈhäbzēən/
adjective

1. relating to or characteristic of the English philosopher Thomas Hobbes or his ideas:

"a Hobbesian state of nature"

noun

1. a person who supports the theories of the English philosopher Thomas Hobbes:

"if he was a Hobbesian, he certainly kept quiet about it"

Powered by Oxford Languages

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Posted by: Providence Chritian College ~ Apr 2, 2020
“Lesson 02 - Thomas Hobbes’s State of Nature and Human Nature (PHL 231)”

Thomas Hobbes
English philosopher (1588-1679)

Thomas Hobbes was an English philosopher, considered to be one of the founders of modern political philosophy. Hobbes is best known for his 1651 book Leviathan, in which he expounds an influential formulation of social contract theory. Wikipedia

Born: April 5, 1588, Malmesbury, England
Died: December 4, 1679, Derbyshire, England
Parents: Thomas Hobbes Sr.
Education: Hertford College, Oxford, St John's College, Cambridge
Written: Leviathan, De Cive

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Thomas Hobbes believed that human nature was fundamentally corrupt. He believed that people were basically greedy and selfish, and that it was greed and selfishness that provided the prime motivation for human behavior.