Question

CRITIQUE vs CRITICISM & DAMAGED PEOPLE BY SINGLE MOTHERHOOD: {16 hours ago}

In formulating this thought it kept becoming multiple OVERLAPPING thoughts – all needing to be addressed. A response came my way, a few days ago, that started as a CRITIQUE & ended with CRITICISM. Now I’m not averse to either; but it was interesting how they ran side by side like a team of horses pulling a chariot. As a chariot was used for good & bad purposes, this dichotomous response was neither good nor bad. After Hollywood's input we tend to think of chariots instruments of war & evil only – not as just another transportation devise. BUT I DIGRESS.

The Great TFM (Turd Flinging Monkey) does ride just such a Dichotomous Chariot creating the Linked Video hereto. And so we find ourselves with DAMAGED PEOPLE BY SINGLE MOTHERS. I forget the precise number; somewhere around 70+% (it’s huge) of imprisoned male criminals for violence against women were the victims of female abuse in their childhood. And women have long been known to be the primary abusers of children. Sexual dimorphism DOES NOT automatically determine that the stronger gender is the abusive gender. The repercussions of childhood trauma actually is so strong it transcends species.

STORY TIME: I’ve always found female dogs better dogs all-round for me. With the exception of when I came into contact (as I don’t like using the word “possession&rdquo with a female dog by the name of Aidel ( you can guess the breed). She was so afraid of male humans her fear extended even to getting fed. Both obvious & a shame she’d been extremely abused by a male at some time in her life.

My only point is that SINGLE MOTHER DAMAGE is the cause of (maybe not all but) most violence by Men against women. When a SINGLE MOTHER abuses her son(s) she’s likely perpetuating a future act of violence against another woman. And I submit that other maladies of character & personality are given birth to as well by SINGLE MOTHER DAMAGE (ABUSE). And before you go off the deep end, the malady of which I speak isn’t Sex Doll & the like – it’s the blanket condemnation of centuries old religious teachings. Throwing the baby out with the bath water as it were. Perhaps you’ll discern what I mean in this CRITIQUE & CRITICISM video by the Great TFM ( Turd Flinging Monkey)?

Young Men as always, consider #MGTOW (Men Going Their Own Way) Galt 1 Corinthians 7:1.

Turd Flinging Monkey Jun 6, 2020
“How Collectivists Killed America and Blamed Individualists”

#religious #children #violence #humans #video #fear #evil #sex

1914wizard 8

Answer 1

If civilization ever had a serious problem most of the single mothers and their children would die.

Most essential services such as food, water, shelter and protection are still provided by males and the skills required are not easily acquired.

This fact is one of the serious flaws in Marxist theory. The obsession with workers essential ignored that civilization itself started with agriculture. Agriculture that fully developed in places like Summer that had harsh but extremely stable environments. Started by people that were probably pushed their by stronger and more violent nomads.

It's very difficult for people to understand that what they have been told is a utopian vision is little more than a preference for a fast life history. What Marx was actually advocating is a return to tribal conditions where hierarchy is intermittent and evolutionarily disadvantageous. It's only after civilization exist that the environment shifts from the natural easy but unstable environment to the unnatural harsh but stable environment.

The next major concept Marx failed to notice was that capitalism is not an economic system but a management system. It manages the natural predisposition for a fast lifestyle by making a slow lifestyle attractive enough to be voluntarily adopted.

By a slow lifestyle we mean both behavioral changes and changes in selection. They include institutions such as monogamy, heavy investment in children, neotony and self domestication, increased sexual dimorphism, the adoption of long term goals, suppressed gratification, organized religion, acceptance of merit hierarchies, formalized security forces, justice systems that are not vengeful, high levels of cooperative competition, so on and so forth or a relatively high preference for K strategies.

State ownership such as seen with a monarchy is really not the problem the problem is Marxist ideology is a spiteful mutant. There are reasons why liberal democracy is superior to monarchy but that is a different discussion.


Author	Author:
Type of abuse	I think this violates the community guidelines. Chat or rant, adult content, spam, insulting other members I think this is illegal. Harm to minors, violence or threats, harassment or privacy invasion, impersonation or misrepresentation, fraud or phishing, etc.
Additional Details If Needed

Chat room is open

Post a comment Author often replies/likes Reply Author often replies/likes Add Photo

Be part of the movement!

1 comment

Recent Visitors 8

Photos 11,797 More

Members 9,403Top

Moderators

Related GroupsMore