Had you heard of asystomatic before 2020?
They made lockdown to stop asystomatic spread. But it is still spreading. Why?. Sick people spread it not healthy spread it. So why continue this lockdown instead of just locking down high risk sector?
Why not do a study to test to see when the virus is most transmissible?
Why not just get systematic people and close contacts to isolate?
We know you can still test positive at different times. Some 3 days after going into isolation. Others up to 16 days of quarantine. Why the difference? Is it some just get a droplet other get direct contact? If you get direct contact you get more virus transmitted. So is it direct contact that makes it go faster? Is it the stronger immune system that suppressed it longer. Is it the vitamin D levels that drop off as isolation continued that makes the immune system weaker and allow the virus to thrive? The levels of vitamin D are a well known factor with cold and flu. A regular vaccine they put an inert part of a pathogen. Then your immune system makes a response. It recognises the pathogen as a foreign object. Then grows antibodies and tcells.
The new carry code mRNA that is normally only found inside cells. It is normally short lived. It is very unstable. That's why it is stored differently.
It this going 3 steps backwards? Why are they not giving an inert part of the virus like normal vaccines?
Our defence system has a normal immune response to stop mRNA. Which is very affective at stopping mRNA from entering the cell wall.
How long does the affect last?
Which cells is this mRNA designed to go into?
Are they gene based vaccines?
It has a spike protein (docking protein) a binding cell receptor. It has fusogenic properties. So has the potential to cause blood clots. Some people manufacture lots of immune response, some a little and most medium. It is the ones that have the largest distribution of the uptake of the vaccine that have the highest that pose the greatest risk of blood coagulation.
Is there a test to test for the distribution and subsequent immune response? I think so. So why not test routinely to manage the side affects? What site is this taken up in the body? Is there a test for this? Why do I say this, because if the site is in the brain this is when the risk of cognitive vein thrombosis (stroke or death) but if site is in the abdomen it is less risky and easier to treat. These clots still poses a risk of entering the blood stream and entering the heart. But as asked earlier how long does this remain active. Could thrombosis be a long term affect that will become more evidence as the time passes.
Unlike regular vaccines where you get a measured dose. But these new treatment it is distributed differently in every single person. So some high some low most medium. So people with high response have higher risk. This first come to light when clusters of young healthy women died from blood clots.
Hydrochlorican ivermectin and a couple of steroids have had positive results without the serious complications. As no one has done clinical trials just doctors stumbling around trying something. Ivermectin is said to be given at 1.5-2mgs per KG. Depending on different doctors experience.
Why are these alternative treatments getting trails?
Why shunned by media?
Why banned is some instances? Like Victoria Australia has banned hydrochlorican and ivermectin.
Ivermectin can be used both as a preventative measures and treatment. It has been used for decades so no unknown side affects.
Phase 3 studies care usually done over years not done on general population.
Why pregnant women with miscarriages now coming in recipients of this treatment?
Not one dead child 10 million children in England. So far this pandemic. But according to the latest statistics if inoculated at least 12 will die. Hundred or thousands will get bells palsy. So why give to children?
Risks factor in covid. Age. Over 70 is when it is a significant contributor. Medical condition. Average of 2.6 pre-existing conditions.
Benefits of vaccination. No lockdown and freedom to carry a vaccine passport.
Variants have only a small differences. . 03% so should we be scared? Will our immune system notice the difference? Will the vaccine work on new variants?
So what next boosters?
Are they going to just roll out these new boosters without additional testing? Because if they wait for the normal time the vaccine will be redundant.
Should this be mandatory?
Should you wait to see long term affects?
People demand that I give a reason to not get the new experimental treatment? Well I demand more information before taking part in a trial and don't see in a free country why I should?