2203160800W SOCIALISM = CONTROL, CENTRALIZED CONTROL OF OTHERS REGARDLESS OF THE SHADE OF LIPSTICK THE PIG IS WEARING?

With the exact shade of that lipstick varying all the from “The New Deal” and National Socialism to Scandinavia to The USSR (Union of the Soviet Socialist Republic) to North Korea, China and the Khmer Rouge etc, etc. If you don’t see the color or shade you like, then create your own – that’s what socialism excells at after all? There’s very many shades to choose from, but they ALL have one thing in common – they’re founded upon socialism.

The one thing you can be sure of is that THE MORE SOCIAL CONTROL THE LESS INDIVIDUAL LIBERTY THERE’LL BE – THAT’S FOR SURE!

First consult MARX for how to get a pig to put your chosen lipstick on – what ever shade you finally decide upon?

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
EXCERPT FROM ENCYCLOPEDIA BRITANNICA:

“communism, political and economic doctrine that aims to replace private property and a profit-based economy with public ownership and communal control of at least the major means of production (e.g., mines, mills, and factories) and the natural resources of a society. Communism is thus a form of socialism—a higher and more advanced form, according to its advocates. Exactly how communism differs from socialism has long been a matter of debate, but the distinction rests largely on the communists’ adherence to the revolutionary socialism of Karl Marx.

Like most writers of the 19th century, Marx tended to use the terms communism and socialism interchangeably. In his Critique of the Gotha Programme (1875), however, Marx identified two phases of communism that would follow the predicted overthrow of capitalism: the first would be a transitional system in which the working class would control the government and economy yet still find it necessary to pay people according to how long, hard, or well they worked, and the second would be fully realized communism—a society without class divisions or government, in which the production and distribution of goods would be based upon the principle “From each according to his ability, to each according to his needs.” Marx’s followers, especially the Russian revolutionary Vladimir Ilich Lenin, took up this distinction.

In State and Revolution (1917), Lenin asserted that socialism corresponds to Marx’s first phase of communist society and communism proper to the second. Lenin and the Bolshevik wing of the Russian Social-Democratic Workers’ Party reinforced this distinction in 1918, the year after they seized power in Russia, by taking the name All-Russian Communist Party. Since then, communism has been largely, if not exclusively, identified with the form of political and economic organization developed in the Soviet Union and adopted subsequently in the People’s Republic of China and other countries ruled by communist parties.

For much of the 20th century, in fact, about one-third of the world’s population lived under communist regimes. These regimes were characterized by the rule of a single party that tolerated no opposition and little dissent. In place of a capitalist economy, in which individuals compete for profits, moreover, party leaders established a command economy in which the state controlled property and its bureaucrats determined wages, prices, and production goals. The inefficiency of these economies played a large part in the collapse of the Soviet Union in 1991, and the remaining communist countries (excepting North Korea) are now allowing greater economic competition while holding fast to one-party rule. Whether they will succeed in this endeavour remains to be seen. Succeed or fail, however, communism is clearly not the world-shaking force it was in the 20th century.”

Britannica goes on to falsely state that early Christianity practiced a form of socialism – that being because they, like many, apparently don’t understand Christianity – no, not in the least?

Then there’ll be the inevitable person who’ll insist that there’s some notable distinction between socialism and communism – NOT REALLY! They’re both thieving sibling born of the same evil parents – greed and envy?

Posted by: Disturban History
“S21 - The Khmer Rouge Prison From Hell”

#LETSGOBRANDON
#MGTOW (Men Going Their Own Way) an individualist philosophy of life – consider it?

Please do correct any errors your discern - thanks in advance!
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Khmer Rouge
/kəˌmer ˈro͞oZH/

1. a communist guerrilla organization which opposed the Cambodian government in the 1960s and waged a civil war from 1970, taking power in 1975.

Powered by Oxford Dictionaries
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
com·mu·nism
/ˈkämyəˌniz(ə)m/
noun

1. a political theory derived from Karl Marx, advocating class war and leading to a society in which all property is publicly owned and each person works and is paid according to their abilities and needs.

Powered by Oxford Dictionaries