Good points mostly. My commentary was more being facetious, than being serious. Most the laws that exist should be stricken, they certainly don't need to be making more. The government that governs best governs least.

I would like to point out I did not call the politicians idiots, but rather their laws idiotic, which I stand by. However the fact they got elected does not actually indicate they are intelligent people. Take this broad from Virginia. I believe she honestly thinks this law she is proposing is a good idea, and will stop gun violence. AOC is anything but intelligent. She got elected because the group Justice Democrats manipulated the system with millions of dollars. AOC just had her name put into a casting call for the best airhead that met the qualifications of being a woman, and a minority. I expect much the same process was used in getting Ilhan Omar elected to office.

Now you are basically calling me an idiot for paying any kind of tax that foots the bills for these elected cons. Tell how is you have found a way not to pay any taxes at all and still not live under a bridge. Another questions that comes to mind, if those in power should find out what kind of prison sentence would you get?

@KCSantiago

You got me, thanks. While you were being facetious I was being general, not personal. I use the word if, when I can remember to do so, so as to turn away from personal attack.

Example: "If you do not know the difference between a law and a statute, then..."

If the shoe fits, then the shoe fits, if the one in question is just being facetious, then the facetious shoe fits.

"Most the laws that exist should be stricken, they certainly don't need to be making more."

Like the following?

"It was a principle of the Common Law, as it is of the law of nature, and of common sense, that no man can be taxed without his personal consent. The Common Law knew nothing of that system, which now prevails in England, of assuming a man’s own consent to be taxed, because some pretended representative, whom he never authorized to act for him, has taken it upon himself to consent that he may be taxed. That is one of the many frauds on the Common Law, and the English constitution, which have been introduced since Magna Carta. Having finally established itself in England, it has been stupidly and servilely copied and submitted to in the United States."

or from the same source:

"There has, probably, never been a legal jury, nor a legal trial by jury, in a single court of the United States, since the adoption of the constitution.
These facts show how much reliance can be placed in written constitutions, to control the action of the government, and preserve the liberties of the people.
If the real trial by jury had been preserved in the courts of the United States - that is, if we had had legal juries, and the jurors had known their rights - it is hardly probable that one tenth of the past legislation of Congress would ever have been enacted, or, at least, that, if enacted, it could have been enforced."
Lysander Spooner, Essay on The Trial by Jury, 1852

How about this:

"Plaintiff admitted that it, in combination with the Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis, which are for all practical purposes, because of there interlocking activity and practices, and both being Banking Institutions Incorporated under the Laws of the United States, are in the Law to be treated as one and the same Bank, did create the entire 14,000.00 in money or credit upon its own books by bookkeeping entry. That this was the Consideration used to support the Note dated May 8, 1964 and the Mortgage of the same date. The money and credit first came into existence when they created it. Mr. Morgan admitted that no United States Law or Statute existed which gave him the right to do this. A lawful consideration must exist and be tendered to support the Note. See Anheuser-Bush Brewing co. V. Emma Mason, 44 Minn. 318. The Jury found there was no lawful consideration and I agree. Only God can create something of value out of nothing."
STATE OF MINNESOTA
COUNTY OF SCOTT
First National Bank of Montgomery, Plaintiff
vs
Jerome Daly, Defendant.
December 9, 1968