The evidence does not matter to propagandists and, despite the public appearance that the U.S. President is battling the Deep State apparatus, it seems now that the Deep State and the head of the country are now finally reading from the same page.

The roots of a Washington push for a new war on Iran can be found in the 1992 Defense Planning Guidance, the 1996 paper called A Clean Break: A New Strategy for Securing the Realm, the 2000 Rebuilding America’s Defenses, and in a 2001 Pentagon memo described by Wesley Clark as listing these nations for attack: Iraq, Libya, Somalia, Sudan, Lebanon, Syria, and Iran.

Wolfowitz Doctrine

Paul Wolfowitz, a leading neoconservative, penned the Wolfowitz Doctrine shortly after the Soviet collapse. This doctrine is the basis of US foreign and military policy.

The doctrine states:

“Our first objective is to prevent the re-emergence of a new rival, either on the territory of the former Soviet Union or elsewhere, that poses a threat on the order of that posed formerly by the Soviet Union. This is a dominant consideration underlying the new regional defense strategy and requires that we endeavor to prevent any hostile power from dominating a region whose resources would, under consolidated control, be sufficient to generate global power.”

Notice that Washington’s “first objective” is not peace, not prosperity, not human rights, not democracy, not justice. Washington’s “first objective” is world hegemony. Only the very confident so blatantly reveal their agenda.

The Wolfowitz doctrine requires Washington to dispense with or overthrow governments that do not acquiesce to Washington’s will. It is the “first objective.”

Remember the Kellogg–Briand Pact (or Pact of Paris, officially General Treaty for Renunciation of War as an Instrument of National Policy) in which signatory states promised not to use war to resolve "disputes or conflicts of whatever nature or of whatever origin they may be, which may arise among them." Parties failing to abide by this promise "should be denied of the benefits furnished by this treaty." It was signed by Germany, France and the United States on August 27, 1928, and by most other nations soon after. Sponsored by France and the U.S., the Pact renounced the use of war and called for the peaceful settlement of disputes.

Overthrowing-other-peoples-governments
[williamblum.org]

War didn't just break out....it was planned. Here are the operational plans of empire.

Sykes–Picot Agreement 1916
[en.m.wikipedia.org]

Red Line Agreement 1928
[en.m.wikipedia.org]

The Pentagon’s Law of War Manual: A Recipe for Total War and Military Dictatorship
[globalresearch.ca]
[globalresearch.ca]
[globalresearch.ca]
[globalresearch.ca]

Here are the US plans.... 1997 with roots in the 1992 pentagon. And look at who the founders and agents are....and wake up.
[dougfeith.com]
[sourcewatch.org]
[whatreallyhappened.com]

The greater Israel project
[globalresearch.ca]

The New Middle East project
[globalresearch.ca]

The Yinon Plan of 1982, drafted when hard-right politician Menachim Begin was prime minister, was outlined in a paper entitled “A Strategy for Israel in the 1980s.” It maintained that Israel’s security would be guaranteed only if its neighbors were to be somehow forced or otherwise induced to come apart and return to their tribal, ethnic, and religious constituencies, which had been arbitrarily combined into individual nation-states by the imperial powers after World War I. The Yinon Plan included recommendations for military action to accomplish what might not be done more clandestinely, including an Israeli invasion of Syria to break the country down into Alawite, Druze, Sunni, and Christian communities. A fragmented Arab world creating a “Balkanized” weak-state system for the region, combined with relocation of the Palestinians to Jordan, would remove all the threats to Israel’s survival.

<a href="https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Yinon_Plano" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank" class="forumlink">[en.m.wikipedia.org]</a>

Pentagon’s Training Grounds For Afghan and Future Wars
[globalresearch.ca]

All these leftists appear to have Schummer eye socket shadows. Schummer looks like a raccoon caught in the headlights. Is it a sign of dishonesty?

Diversity is confined to gender and race as far as these leftist hypocrites and bigots are concerned.
Look a little deeper into their hypocrisy and you realize that they have no diversity of freedoms, opinion or speech.
It’s like gun control - it’s their way or the highway.
All they acknowledge is their color, race and opinions which they telegraph onto their mindless guilt ridden white surrogates.
I am expressing my right to free speech, and a diverse opinion.
So yes the color of pot is up for debate!
One last thing. Lemon and Maddow are the lefts examples of utter failure.