slug.com slug.com
1
1 Like Show

Comments

And then there was light
Josf-Kelley comments on Feb 18, 2020:
And there goes his career in Hollyweird.
Adam Kokesh for president [youtu.be]
Josf-Kelley comments on Feb 18, 2020:
That was inspiring. As to the Standing Army fallacy: First a quote of the end of the message from the first Congress, a message sent to those "just following criminal, aggressive, orders," for pay. "Such of you as are skilled in manufactures, over and above these lands and other articles, will find riches in prosecuting your occupations, the necessaries of life being very cheap in proportion to the price of manufactures, and the demand for them is so great, that every mechanick will find full employment. Some of you have had an opportunity of observing the truth of these assertions, and will doubtless inform their countrymen and acquaintance of these facts. "We have hitherto met you in the field of battle, with hostile minds, urged on by the great principle of self-defense; yet in those instances, where the fortune of war hath delivered any of your countrymen into our hands, we appeal to them that our enmity hath ceased the moment they were disarmed; and we have treated them more like citizens than prisoners of war. We now address you as part of the great family of mankind, whose freedom and happiness we most earnestly wish to promote and establish. "Distain, then, to continue the instruments of frantick ambition and lawless power. Feel the dignity and importance of your nature. Rise to the rank of free citizens of free states. Desist from the vain attempt to ravage and depopulate a country you cannot subdue, and accept from our munificence what can never be obtained from our fears. We are willing to receive you with open arms into the bosom of our country. Come, then, and partake of the blessings we tender to you in sincerity of heart. "In the name of these sovereign, free, and independent states we promise and engage to you that great privilege of man, the free and uninterrupted exercise of your religion, complete protection of your persons from injury, the peaceable possessions of the fruits of your honest industry, the absolute property in the soil granted to you to defend, unless you shall otherwise dispose of it, to your children and your children's children for ever. "Resolved, That it be recommended to the several states, who have vacant lands, to lay off with as much expedition as possible, a sufficient quantity of lands to answer the purposes expressed in the forgoing address; for which lands no charge is to be made against the United States." That was the Federation, under the common law (meaning under The People), before the criminal cabal of Slave Traders, Central Banking Frauds, Warmongers, Aristocrats, and their sycophants took over in 1789. To restate what is meant by a federation (original meaning) the following is also taken from the original, grass-roots, organic, common law first federal congress: "That...
Adam Kokesh for president [youtu.be]
Josf-Kelley comments on Feb 18, 2020:
Time 16:35 I think that Kokesh is also, apparently, naive concerning the original purpose of forming and founding the original Federation. All it would take at this time in the World Wide Reality is an idea to pop into the heads of the Chinese Dictator, or someone in power in the Dictatorship of China, to seize the opportunity to launch boots on the ground in America while Adam is Dissolving the National (it is not Federal) Government along with, presumably, the combined Offensive National Military Forces. Perhaps I will find greater detail later in the video above on this point, but while I am digesting this message I am bouncing it back into the Public domain with my twist on it. The original working Federation, for one example of just why it was formed, included a message sent by those in the original Federal Congress, where the message was sent to those Mercenary Soldiers, war for profit soldiers, such as the Hessians, and that message in part offered the following: "To the officers and soldiers in the service of the king of Great Britain, not subjects of the said king : "The citizens of the United States of America are engaged in a just and necessary war—a war in which they are not the only persons interested. They contend for the rights of human nature, and therefore merit the patronage and assistance of all mankind. Their success will secure a refuge from persecution and tyranny to those who wish to pursue the dictates of their own consciences, and to reap the fruits of their own industry. "That kind Providence, who from seeming evil often produces real good, in permitting us to be involved in this cruel war, and you to be compelled to aid our enemies in their vain attempts to enslave us, doubtless hath in view to establish perfect freedom in the new world, for those who are borne down by the oppression and tyranny of the old. "Considering, therefore, that you are reluctantly compelled to be instruments of avarice and ambition, we not only forgive the injuries which you have been constrained to offer us, but we hold out to your acceptance a participation of the privileges of free and independent states. Large and fertile tracts of country invite and will amply reward your industry. "Townships, from twenty to thirty thousand acres of land, shall be laid out and appropriated to such of you as will come over to us, in the following manner." The point being that among the people all around the world who are "just following orders" are some that will see the light of truth and they will combine forces in DEFENSE of their God given rights. Another note on Free Market Military Defense, if that is a worthy subject to impose into this topic, is provided here: "In June of 1775, George Washington was appointed Major General ...
Adam Kokesh for president [youtu.be]
Josf-Kelley comments on Feb 18, 2020:
I'm at time 10:50 and Adam Kokesh has at least identified the problem associated with the use of the word anarchism, but he is still painfully unaware that his message (so far as I can see) is in agreement (voluntarily) with the original American founding message. His HIStory starts at 1789 when the criminals took over, voting in a "President" of a Nation-State with 2% of the vote, as he claims. It is not Federal. Here is a Federal government explained: "Second, federalism permits the states to operate as laboratories of democracy-to experiment with various policies and Programs. For example, if Tennessee wanted to provide a state-run health system for its citizens, the other 49 states could observe the effects of this venture on Tennessee's economy, the quality of care provided, and the overall cost of health care. If the plan proved to be efficacious other states might choose to emulate it, or adopt a plan taking into account any problems surfacing in Tennessee. If the plan proved to be a disastrous intervention, the other 49 could decide to leave the provision of medical care to the private sector. With national plans and programs, the national officials simply roll the dice for all 284 million people of the United States and hope they get things right. "Experimentation in policymaking also encourages a healthy competition among units of government and allows the people to vote with their feet should they find a law of policy detrimental to their interests. Using again the state-run health system as an example, if a citizen of Tennessee was unhappy with Tennessee's meddling with the provisions of health care, the citizen could move to a neighboring state. Reallocation to a state like North Carolina, with a similar culture and climate, would not be a dramatic shift and would be a viable option. Moreover, if enough citizens exercised this option, Tennessee would be pressured to abandon its foray into socialized medicine, or else lose much of its tax base. To escape a national health system, a citizen would have to emigrate to a foreign country, an option far less appealing and less likely to be exercised than moving to a neighboring state. Without competition from other units of government, the national government would have much less incentive than Tennessee would to modify the objectionable policy. Clearly, the absence of experimentation and competition hampers the creation of effective programs and makes the modification of failed national programs less likely." Reclaiming the American Revolution: The Kentucky and Virginia Resolutions and Their Legacy by William Watkins Previous to the take-over by the gang who were treasonous criminals (treasonous to moral government which is voluntary association) the Presidents of The United ...
Adam Kokesh for president [youtu.be]
Josf-Kelley comments on Feb 18, 2020:
I wrote to Adam when he was kidnapped in Maryland (actually in the Legal Fiction Enforced area of Maryland called Washington D.C.) for the bogus crime of being armed, and he wrote back. I sent Adam a copy of Equitable Commerce by Josiah Warren, but my guess is that it too was "Endorsed" by the National (it is not Federal) Injustice Department.
Media Bias exists in all platforms [youtu.be]
Josf-Kelley comments on Feb 17, 2020:
Time 15 or so: "...a known lothario..." speaking about Ted Kennedy.
People power: VA ban defeated, WA gun owners can take a lesson... [ammoland.com]
Josf-Kelley comments on Feb 17, 2020:
"It came a month after an estimated 22,000 heavily-armed Virginians and supporters from other states descended on the State Capitol in Richmond to “just say No” to new gun control. It follows the actions of nearly all Virginia counties to declare themselves as “Second Amendment Sanctuaries.” I wonder why Antifa didn't show up to riot? Hmmmmm.
Ready for some political correctness?
Josf-Kelley comments on Feb 17, 2020:
If the brainwashing was overt, would it still work?
High capacity problems?
Josf-Kelley comments on Feb 17, 2020:
Hmmm
I suppose this article raises a good point.
Josf-Kelley comments on Feb 17, 2020:
"No political issue in 2020 approaches slavery in the mid-19th century in terms of potential divisiveness." That is a complete failure to understand the cause if divisiveness. The cause is always those who choose criminal acts instead of non-criminal acts. They have names, they wear pants, they are responsible for the divisiveness, and failure to account for that fact accountable to them leads to divisiveness. Cause: Those who perpetrate crimes that lead to divisiveness Failure: Those who fail to accurately account for the cause, and then reasonably fail to defend against the cause. What, for example, does the following words mean: In the Writings of Thomas Jefferson, Vol. I. p. 10 "The clause, too, reprobating the enslaving the inhabitants of Africa, was struck out in complaisance to South Carolina and Georgia, who had never attempted to restrain the importation of slaves, and who, on the contrary, still wished to continue it. Our northern brethren also, I believe felt a little tender under those censures; for, though their people had very few slaves themselves, yet they had been pretty considerable carriers of them to others." Most people today have no clue as to what the above means. Context may help people today who may want to know what those words mean in the context of this current Article in Politics, Law & Policy Forum at IDW community Web Page. "northern bethren," "South Carolina," and "Georgia" were special, and they (those people not named) had a Special Interest. They, not named by name, had the Special Interest known collectively as African Slavery. Who in the world wants to perpetrate human trafficking? What might happen if human trafficking goes undefended, for failure to provide sanctuary to runaway slaves running away from the criminals who enslave them? Where is the law? What happened to the law? On the 20th day of October 1774 "This agreement contained a clause to discontinue the slave trade, and a provision not to import East India tea from any part of the world. In the article respecting non-exportations, the sending of rice to Europe was excepted." On the 1st of April, 1775 "On this occasion, the importation of slaves was expressly prohibited." What can be expected to happen if the victims are not defended in an expeditious manner: justice delayed is justice denied? No one knew? Notes on the State of Virginia by Thomas Jefferson, 1781 "To emancipate all slaves born after passing the act. The bill reported by the revisors does not itself contain this proposition; but an amendment containing it was prepared, to be offered to the legislature whenever the bill should be taken up, and further directing, that they should continue with their parents to a certain age, then be ...
VOX .
Josf-Kelley comments on Feb 16, 2020:
"The Founding Fathers came together at Philadelphia to achieve union at nearly any cost, because they wanted to avoid the persistent warfare that plagued Europe. Without a union, Amar says, “each nation-state might well raise an army, ostensibly to protect itself against Indians or Europeans, but also perhaps to awe its neighbors.”" No, that is wrong. That is the "HIS" story fabricated out of a devious mind, and passed on to more devious minds, and then swallowed whole by the gullible. There was no group knowable as "The Founding Fathers" whereby this group did things lock step as one, all in the group thinking and acting and making moves toward the same single (monopoly) goal. The above statement concerning what the Aristocratic Class used as fear mongering was meticulously taken apart by opponents of the goal of Nationalism (then termed consolidation) who did not want the "country" run by the Aristocratic Class whose power would be arbitrary and absolute. Those against the move to turn the existing Federation that had sufficed to bind enough people into the common cause of Voluntary Mutual Defense against the British War of Aggression - against turning from a Federation - to a Central Power, with a Central Bank, and a Standing Army, and a all powerful National Judicial System copied from the British model - those against that Consolidation - included Patrick Henry, George Mason, Luther Martin, Robert Yates, and many others in or out of government. " That it is necessary, to prevent foreigners from dividing us, or interfering in our government, I deny positively; and, after all, I have strong doubts whether all its advantages are not more specious than solid." A Farmer Published in the Maryland Gazette and Baltimore Advertiser, March 7, 1788 New Constitution Creates A National Government; Will Not Abate Foreign Influence; Dangers Of Civil War And Despotism A large number of people were swayed by the Major Media run by the Aritocratic Class to allow the Aristocratic Class to annihilate the existing Federation of Independent States under the common law, and replace it with an all powerful, arbitrary, despotic, Profitable Monopoly, Nation State. So the Arisocrats called upon Majority Rule to reach for and obtain their goal of usurpation. That is the true story. It was not "fear" of Mob Rule, it was the use of deception to control Mob Rule that was employed by the Nationalist Party (Aristocratic Class), against those who wanted to conserve rule of law in America, which tipped the balance of power in favor of the Aristocrats. This is a proven fact, as soon as the Aristocrats were in power they then documented their all-powerful National Judiciary with the Judiciary Act of 1789, and began enforcing their will through ...
Jordan Peterson. "What You Can Learn From the Power Of Abstraction." [youtu.be]
Josf-Kelley comments on Feb 15, 2020:
Time 10:00 or so: “In good legal systems that emerges from the bottom up. English common law is exactly like that, right, it’s single decisions that are predicated on principles that are hen articulated and made into the body of laws.” The move from unwritten to written common law is fairly well documented as a move from bottom up to top down RULE. That is expressed in the following: "It was a principle of the Common Law, as it is of the law of nature, and of common sense, that no man can be taxed without his personal consent. The Common Law knew nothing of that system, which now prevails in England, of assuming a man’s own consent to be taxed, because some pretended representative, whom he never authorized to act for him, has taken it upon himself to consent that he may be taxed. That is one of the many frauds on the Common Law, and the English constitution, which have been introduced since Magna Carta. Having finally established itself in England, it has been stupidly and servilely copied and submitted to in the United States.” Lysander Spooner, Essay on The Trial by Jury, 1852 I think it is safe to say that good legal systems are voluntary and natural, while those moves that move people into bad legal systems, like moving rats into a corner, or slaves into a cage, are involuntary and unnatural: pathological.
Laurie Garrett reporter who has worked in over 30 epidemic zones, including SARS in China and Ebola ...
Josf-Kelley comments on Feb 15, 2020:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?time_continue=6&v=ZyZwtKJn-Ac=emb_logo PM Lee urges Singapore to take courage amid coronavirus outbreak
Laurie Garrett reporter who has worked in over 30 epidemic zones, including SARS in China and Ebola ...
Josf-Kelley comments on Feb 15, 2020:
https://www.healthline.com/health/r-nought-reproduction-number What do R0 values mean? Three possibilities exist for the potential spread or decline of a disease, depending on its R0 value: If R0 is less than 1, each existing infection causes less than one new infection. In this case, the disease will decline and eventually die out. If R0 equals 1, each existing infection causes one new infection. The disease will stay alive and stable, but there won’t be an outbreak or an epidemic. If R0 is more than 1, each existing infection causes more than one new infection. The disease will spread between people, and there may be an outbreak or epidemic. Importantly, a disease’s R0 value only applies when everyone in a population is completely vulnerable to the disease. This means: no one has been vaccinated no one has had the disease before there’s no way to control the spread of the disease
AndrewMcCarthy: AG Barr and the sentencing kerfuffle. [thehill.com]
Josf-Kelley comments on Feb 15, 2020:
"Federal crimes are codified in statutes, which prescribe punishment in broad terms, say, zero-to-20 years for bank robbery." That is dictatorial dogma. It was warned at the beginning of the take-over, that those criminals taking over the law of the land (the common law) were going to replace trial by jury with Summary JUST-US. Rather than the people judging fact at law, which includes the facts that must thereby determine what is just or unjust in punishment, the criminals dictate what is or is not a punishment, and they do so arbitrarily, not as is suggested above: punishment prescribed. When child rapists are slapped on the wrist and Waco survivors are imprisoned (probably raped in prison) for failing to be burned alive by criminals in government, then the truth of the facts that matter are clearly in view. When the criminals in government conspire to murder someone like Martin Luther King Jr., and get away with it, and a conspiracy murder trial for that case is delayed for 30 years, then the government punishes people for speaking the truth, prescribing a murder sentence to the truth teller, and those who murder the truth teller are rewarded with a hansom Golden Parachute added to their sizable government pay rate. Roger Stone is "justly" sentenced, while Killary and Slick Willy rake in the rewards for their collective "suicides." Yea right.
I'm reposting this from "Philosophy/Ideas section Jan.
Josf-Kelley comments on Feb 15, 2020:
To the citizens of the United States by Thomas Paine November 15, 1802 "But a faction, acting in disguise, was rising in America; they had lost sight of first principles. They were beginning to contemplate government as a profitable monopoly, and the people as hereditary property. It is, therefore, no wonder that the "Rights of Man" was attacked by that faction, and its author continually abused. But let them go on; give them rope enough and they will put an end to their own insignificance. There is too much common sense and independence in America to be long the dupe of any faction, foreign or domestic. "But, in the midst of the freedom we enjoy, the licentiousness of the papers called Federal (and I know not why they are called so, for they are in their principles anti-federal and despotic), is a dishonor to the character of the country, and an injury to its reputation and importance abroad. They represent the whole people of America as destitute of public principle and private manners. "As to any injury they can do at home to those whom they abuse, or service they can render to those who employ them, it is to be set down to the account of noisy nothingness. It is on themselves the disgrace recoils, for the reflection easily presents itself to every thinking mind, that those who abuse liberty when they possess it would abuse power could they obtain it; and, therefore, they may as well take as a general motto, for all such papers, we and our patrons are not fit to be trusted with power. "There is in America, more than in any other country, a large body of people who attend quietly to their farms, or follow their several occupations; who pay no regard to the clamors of anonymous scribblers, who think for themselves, and judge of government, not by the fury of newspaper writers, but by the prudent frugality of its measures, and the encouragement it gives to the improvement and prosperity of the country; and who, acting on their own judgment, never come forward in an election but on some important occasion. "When this body moves, all the little barkings of scribbling and witless curs pass for nothing. To say to this independent description of men, "You must turn out such and such persons at the next election, for they have taken off a great many taxes, and lessened the expenses of government, they have dismissed my son, or my brother, or myself, from a lucrative office, in which there was nothing to do"-is to show the cloven foot of faction, and preach the language of ill-disguised mortification. "In every part of the Union, this faction is in the agonies of death, and in proportion as its fate approaches, gnashes its teeth and struggles. My arrival has struck it as with an hydrophobia, it is like the sight of water to canine ...
Tax his land, Tax his bed, Tax the table, At which he's fed.
Josf-Kelley comments on Feb 14, 2020:
"We had absolutely no national debt, had the largest middle class in the world, and Mom stayed home to raise the kids." Previous to 1789 the Federation was funded by voluntary payments made to the Federal FUND by States. The drive to annihilate the States Sovereignty (and thereby the people's sovereignty) was inspired in part by the desire to create and maintain a National (not federal) Debt based money system also known as Central Banking Fraud. "But Hamilton wanted to go farther than debt assumption. He believed a funded national debt would assist in establishing public credit. By funding national debt, Hamilton envisioned the Congress setting aside a portion of tax revenues to pay each year's interest without an annual appropriation. Redemption of the principal would be left to the government's discretion. At the time Hamilton gave his Report on Public Credit, the national debt was $80 million. Though such a large figure shocked many Republicans who saw debt as a menace to be avoided, Hamilton perceived debt's benefits. "In countries in which the national debt is properly funded, and the object of established confidence," explained Hamilton, "it assumes most of the purposes of money." Federal stock would be issued in exchange for state and national debt certificates, with interest on the stock running about 4.5 percent. To Republicans the debt proposals were heresy. The farmers and planters of the South, who were predominantly Republican, owed enormous sums to British creditors and thus had firsthand knowledge of the misery wrought by debt. Debt, as Hamilton himself noted, must be paid or credit is ruined. High levels of taxation, Republicans prognosticated, would be necessary just to pay the interest on the perpetual debt. Believing that this tax burden would fall on the yeoman farmers and eventually rise to European levels, Republicans opposed Hamilton's debt program. "To help pay the interest on the debt, Hamilton convinced the Congress to pass an excise on whiskey. In Federalist N. 12, Hamilton noted that because "[t]he genius of the people will ill brook the inquisitive and peremptory spirit of excise law," such taxes would be little used by the national government. In power, the Secretary of the Treasury soon changed his mind and the tax on the production of whiskey rankled Americans living on the frontier. Cash was scarce in the West and the Frontiersmen used whiskey as an item of barter." Reclaiming the American Revolution: The Kentucky and Virginia Resolutions and their Legacy by William Watkins I did not see (perhaps it is listed and I missed it) the hidden tax falsely called "inflation" on the Tax List.
Tax his land, Tax his bed, Tax the table, At which he's fed.
Josf-Kelley comments on Feb 14, 2020:
"It was a principle of the Common Law, as it is of the law of nature, and of common sense, that no man can be taxed without his personal consent. The Common Law knew nothing of that system, which now prevails in England, of assuming a man’s own consent to be taxed, because some pretended representative, whom he never authorized to act for him, has taken it upon himself to consent that he may be taxed. That is one of the many frauds on the Common Law, and the English constitution, which have been introduced since Magna Carta. Having finally established itself in England, it has been stupidly and servilely copied and submitted to in the United States." Lysander Spooner, Essay on The Trial by Jury, 1852
This is HUGE!!! These 8 States Could Form The Interstate Compact on 2nd Amendment Sanctuary! - ...
Josf-Kelley comments on Feb 14, 2020:
House Bill 753 AN ACT TO AUTHORIZE THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI TO ENTER INTO AN INTERSTATE COMPACT WITH SOUTHERN STATES FOR THE PURPOSE OF OPERATING AS SECOND AMENDMENT SANCTUARY STATES; TO ESTABLISH THE INTERSTATE COMMISSION ON SECOND AMENDMENT SANCTUARY AND PRESCRIBE ITS POWERS AND DUTIES; TO EXEMPT CERTAIN FIREARMS, FIREARM ACCESSORIES AND AMMUNITION IN THIS STATE FROM FEDERAL REGULATION; TO DECLARE CERTAIN FEDERAL STATUTES, REGULATIONS, RULES, AND ORDERS UNCONSTITUTIONAL UNDER THE CONSTITUTION OF THE UNITED STATES AND UNENFORCEABLE IN THIS COMPACT REGION; TO REQUIRE THE ATTORNEYS GENERAL OF COMPACT STATES TO FILE ANY LEGAL ACTION TO PREVENT IMPLEMENTATION OF A FEDERAL STATUTE, REGULATION, RULE OR ORDER THAT VIOLATES THE RIGHTS OF A RESIDENT OF A COMPACT STATE; AND FOR RELATED PURPOSES. https://legiscan.com/MS/text/HB753/2020?fbclid=IwAR0yY-L_LxBPgGpLyijYkKs3LiE929ZkSx_XHgrhRWj388lsvVyY78xDItY
American Exceptionalism: Delusion and Illusion
Josf-Kelley comments on Feb 13, 2020:
Manifest Destiny is a slogan, it is what is also called a false flag, and it covers up the truth. The truth of Manifest Destiny is that the so-called government of America is run by criminals, and that has been a fact that matters since 1789. Any claim of territory by someone who wants territory already occupied by people is a claim that can be negotiated for validity. I've been reading up on this in a book titled Conceived in Liberty by Murray Rothbard. There were (and still are) many case where claims are made and negotiations ensue, and possession, repossession, and dispossession occurs. In many cases a negotiation involves an agreement to pay the existing property owner an agreed upon exchange of value for the land desired by the buyer. That can be quoted from the book in many cases. There are also many cases of criminal acts perpetrated by criminals as criminals rob, rape, torture, murder, and mass murder occupants of territory so as to dispossess those occupants, and so as to possess that territory in that criminal way. The typical cover-up, the typical false flag, the typical claim of "right" to perpetrate those crimes are all the same: lies. "We created a war with Mexico predicated on a lie after they refused to sell us what we wanted so we could justify (at least in our own minds) taking it anyway." That is a lie taken from the Article "American Exceptionalism: Delusion and Illusion" We did not create a war. We never create a war. Specific people create wars, people with names, people who wear clothes. The Emperor that does not wear clothes may try to make people believe that "we" create wars, but "we" don't have to believe those lies. We can employ the law to hold those criminals to account, if we want to do so. Onward to American Exceptionalism: "Virtually every national group sees itself as ‘exceptional’ in relation to all others." Virtually every criminal sees him or herself as "exceptional" in relation to the victims they consume, rob, rape, enslave, torture, murder, or mass murder with a false flag flying or just as a regular old criminal not needing fake justifications for resorting to crime. Onward to the History of criminals infesting America: "To understand our own unique twist to the concept we have to go back to the founding of Massachusetts Bay Colony and John Winthrop’s 1630 sermon, “A Model of Christian Charity” in which he said, “that we shall be as a city upon a hill — the eyes of all people are upon us.” Winthrop was drawing upon Matthew 5:14 that states, “You are the light of the world. A city set on a hill cannot be hidden.” Winthrop is mentioned in Murray Rothbards book too. The criminals claiming to be religious (not everyone was doing so) cut off ears for ...
StrategyPage: Submarines: 2nd generation AIP.
Josf-Kelley comments on Feb 13, 2020:
Hydrogen can also be extracted from water, the waste of that process is oxygen. So...submarines are submerged in water, and the crew needs oxygen.
[youtube.
Josf-Kelley comments on Feb 13, 2020:
Next Jordan Peterson drops the name George Orwell. Orwell wrote about 3 Legal Fiction Criminal Gangs claiming to be governments: 1. Oceania 2. Eurasia 3. Eastasia Returning for my sense of truth telling is the concept that no one knows how do deal with the natural laws government creative production. Where did the America dictators get their money? Where did the German dictators get their money? Where did the Soviet dictators get their money? 1. Wall Street and FDR https://archive.org/details/pdfy-FPUkz4pezsfsrVfZ/mode/2up 2. Wall Street and the Rise of Hitler https://archive.org/details/pdfy-lwUqPAGSzT-3bnd3/mode/2up 3. Wall Street and the Bolshevik Revolution http://www.reformation.org/wall-st-bolshevik-rev.html Who funded the criminal take-over of any (truth based) government anywhere, anytime, and why? If power flows to one then power cannot be allowed to flow to two. Monopoly versus non-monopoly.
[youtube.
Josf-Kelley comments on Feb 13, 2020:
At time 21:00 or so, speaking about the Pareto Principle (80/20 rule?), it was claimed that given enough time a number of traders flipping a coin ends up with one individual with all the money. I think that that is intellectual dishonesty. That is the zero sum game taught in the game Monopoly, an aptly titled game. Why would players in the game be spirited away to the gulag? Why would competitors in the game be exiled from the game? Why would one of the players in the example offered by Jordan Peterson fail to go out and get more money, then return to the game? Why is it important to tell this story about a game where those who fail are removed from the game? Why is that practice of removing players from the game confused with a natural law? Around that time in the video is the following: "If you look at creative production in any domain...what you find is that a very tiny percentage of people produce almost all the output." And: "It’s a deeply build feature of systems of creative production and no one really knows what to do about it." Why are people incapable of seeing the true law power? Why is there so much power against people seeing and then using the true law power? How about the total number of extremely destructive lies produced by all people? "If you look at creative production in any domain...what you find is that a very tiny percentage of people produce almost all the output." "It’s a deeply build feature of systems of creative production and no one really knows what to do about it." Now look here: "First in the importance of its evil influence they considered the money monopoly, which consists of the privilege given by the government to certain individuals, or to individuals holding certain kinds of property, of issuing the circulating medium, a privilege which is now enforced in this country by a national tax of ten per cent., upon all other persons who attempt to furnish a circulating medium, and by State laws making it a criminal offense to issue notes as currency. "It is claimed that the holders of this privilege control the rate of interest, the rate of rent of houses and buildings, and the prices of goods, – the first directly, and the second and third indirectly. For, say Proudhon and Warren, if the business of banking were made free to all, more and more persons would enter into it until the competition should become sharp enough to reduce the price of lending money to the labor cost, which statistics show to be less than three-fourths of once per cent. In that case the thousands of people who are now deterred from going into business by the ruinously high rates which they must pay for capital with which to start and carry on business will find their difficulties removed. If they ...
We are the only sovereign nation in history in which people are free to protest what every other ...
Josf-Kelley comments on Feb 13, 2020:
That is so wrong. We are individual people capable of individual sovereign power of will, but only if we will. The United States was a number of sovereign nations formed into a Voluntary Mutual Defense Assocation or Federation from 1774 to 1789, and it was so formed by individual people in response to criminal British aggression. A federation is a voluntary association as confirmed by the first federal congress in 1776 while deliberating upon the decision to publish a declaration of independence: "That the question was not whether, by a declaration of independence, we should make ourselves what we are not; but whether we should declare a fact which already exists: That, as to the people or Parliament of England, we had always been independent of them, their restraints on our trade deriving efficacy from our acquiescence only, and not from any rights they possessed of imposing them; and that, so far, our connection had been federal only, and was now dissolved by the commencement of hostilities: That, as to the king, we had been bound to him by allegiance, but that this bond was now dissolved by his assent to the late act of Parliament, by which he declares us out of his protection, and by his levying war on us a fact which had long ago proved us out of his protection, it being a certain position in law, that allegiance and protection are reciprocal, the one ceasing when the other is withdrawn:" None: "our connection had been federal only" Our connection was not National. We were not (yet) consolidated into a One World Government in America. We the people could freely run from slavery and run to sanctuary from slavery because we the people made those sanctuaries when and where those sanctuaries were made, which is not where those who enforced One World Government were more powerful than we the people. They, the One World Government people used Summary Justice Courts to collect dubious National Debt and in order to do so, they must usurp the law of the land, which is trial by jury according to the common law, which is eluded to in the Bill of Rights. "We are the only sovereign nation in history in which people are free to protest what every other nation does to protect themselves from invasion and sedition." What was the Judiciary Act of 1789? What was the Naturalization Act of 1790? What was the rationalization for the National excise tax on Whiskey and the formation of the National Central Bank 1791, and what is the actual reason? What was the Whiskey Rebellion Proclamation in 1794? What was the Alien and Sedition Acts of 1798? The Judiciary Act reads the same as a litany of dictates from the English Parliament, and if one were to employ it, one could make it mean anything, one could construct any use for it, ...
Article 1, Section 8 enumerates the power of Congress.
Josf-Kelley comments on Feb 13, 2020:
"Article 1, Section 8 enumerates the power of Congress. Every cent Congress has comes from its right to levy taxes that YOU approve by who you vote in." Wrong. That is so wrong, and it is odd that right before I read that wrong, I read the following: "Modern thinkers “...revived the sense of the collective power of human communities. Man, formerly too humble, begins to think of himself as almost a God. In all this I feel a grave danger, the danger of what might be called cosmic impiety. The concept of "truth" as something dependent of facts largely outside human control has been one of the ways in which philosophy hitherto has inculcated the necessary element of humility. When this check upon pride is removed, a further step is taken on the road toward a certain kind of madness - the intoxication of power which invaded philosophy with Fichte, and to which modern men, whether philosophers or not, are prone. I am persuaded that this intoxication is the greatest danger of our time, and that any philosophy which, however unintentionally, contributes to it is increasing the danger of vast social disorder.” - Bertrand Russell." It does not have any rights. It is a legal fiction, and the only power it has is within each individual human brain or if you will a human soul. It does not exist as an entity with rights, wrongs, judgment, decision making power of will, responsibility to act morally, nor accountability for immoral actions derived from immoral thoughts. It is a Con Game. Debate in Virginia Ratifying Convention June 8, 1788 George Mason: "Among the enumerated powers, Congress are to lay and collect taxes, duties, imposts, and excises, and to pay the debts, and to provide for the general welfare and common defence; and by that clause (so often called the sweeping clause) they are to make all laws necessary to execute those laws. Now, suppose oppressions should arise under this government, and any writer should dare to stand forth, and expose to the community at large the abuses of those powers; could not Congress, under the idea of providing for the general welfare, and under their own construction, say that this was destroying the general peace, encouraging sedition, and poisoning the minds of the people? And could they not, in order to provide against this, lay a dangerous restriction On the press? Might they not even bring the trial of this restriction within the ten miles square, when there is no prohibition against it? Might they not thus destroy the trial by jury?" The Con was to convince people in America that a Legal Fiction can replace their own individual power of will. To remove government by the people through local tribunals called the law of the land, trial by the country, and trial by jury according to the common ...
Federalist: How to handle Mexican Cartels [thefederalist.com]
Josf-Kelley comments on Feb 12, 2020:
"But it would not be enough, as Giovanni Falcone advises, to “follow the money.”"
Judicial Watch.
Josf-Kelley comments on Feb 12, 2020:
I'm not buying it. The carrot on the end of the string hanging down from the stick is "justice" will start soon. Criminals in office have either been born without a working concept of justice or they have abused power to the point at which there is no longer any working sense of justice in their being. Justice delayed is justiced denied. In the delayed time it takes to hold to account (trial transcripts) the offenders, for their offenses, a long, long, long, list of more victims adds to the pile.
[youtube.
Josf-Kelley comments on Feb 12, 2020:
“That the fundamental linkage between the pathology of the state and the individual was the individual’s propensity to deceive him or herself and to fail to act in an authentic manner, in a genuine and authentic manner, and to become as a consequence either nihilistic, let’s say, because of the incremental weakening of character that’s part and parcel of adopting an inauthentic mode of being or to turn to ideological and totalitarian solutions as an alternative to living appropriately and with responsibility as an individual.” Jordan Peterson, Lecture, Existentialism via Solzhenitsyn Counterfeit life includes the parroting of the dogma that the Legal Fiction is a being that is both responsible and accountable, and therefore individuals are not, and therefore individuals can do whatever they want whenever they want, and that like the counterfeit Christian "forgiveness" before the fact, works to rationalize any behavior whatsoever, but the natural law kicks in as the individual's brain rots, and the individual destroys his or her own capacity to act in the individual's own best interest. "My son, if sinners entice you, Do not consent. If they say, "Come with us, Let us lie in wait for blood, Let us ambush the innocent without cause; Let us swallow them alive like Sheol, Even whole, as those who go down to the pit; We will find all kinds of precious wealth, We will fill our houses with spoil; Throw in your lot with us, We shall all have one purse," My son, do not walk in the way with them. Keep your feet from their path, For their feet run to evil And they hasten to shed blood. Indeed, it is useless to spread the baited net In the sight of any bird; But they lie in wait for their own blood ; They ambush their own lives. So are the ways of everyone who gains by violence ; It takes away the life of its possessors."
Five easy ways to reduce national debt and shrink government- [thelibertarianrepublic.
Josf-Kelley comments on Feb 12, 2020:
It isn't Federal, it is National. If it were Federal it would only deal with the states, not the people in the states, and therefore it would not cost as much. It became National so as to create the power to reach into each individual's pocket and steal whatever can be stolen. It is not the business of the National government to police itself, never was, never will be, it will protect itself and it will spend whatever needs to be spent to keep itself going in The National Interest, and then extract the spent value from those who create it. "But Hamilton wanted to go farther than debt assumption. He believed a funded national debt would assist in establishing public credit. By funding national debt, Hamilton envisioned the Congress setting aside a portion of tax revenues to pay each year's interest without an annual appropriation. Redemption of the principal would be left to the government's discretion. At the time Hamilton gave his Report on Public Credit, the national debt was $80 million. Though such a large figure shocked many Republicans who saw debt as a menace to be avoided, Hamilton perceived debt's benefits. "In countries in which the national debt is properly funded, and the object of established confidence," explained Hamilton, "it assumes most of the purposes of money." Federal stock would be issued in exchange for state and national debt certificates, with interest on the stock running about 4.5 percent. To Republicans the debt proposals were heresy. The farmers and planters of the South, who were predominantly Republican, owed enormous sums to British creditors and thus had firsthand knowledge of the misery wrought by debt. Debt, as Hamilton himself noted, must be paid or credit is ruined. High levels of taxation, Republicans prognosticated, would be necessary just to pay the interest on the perpetual debt. Believing that this tax burden would fall on the yeoman farmers and eventually rise to European levels, Republicans opposed Hamilton's debt program. "To help pay the interest on the debt, Hamilton convinced the Congress to pass an excise on whiskey. In Federalist N. 12, Hamilton noted that because "[t]he genius of the people will ill brook the inquisitive and peremptory spirit of excise law," such taxes would be little used by the national government. In power, the Secretary of the Treasury soon changed his mind and the tax on the production of whiskey rankled Americans living on the frontier. Cash was scarce in the West and the Frontiersmen used whiskey as an item of barter." Reclaiming the American Revolution: The Kentucky and Virginia Resolutions and their Legacy by William Watkins "Will the adoption of this new plan pay our debts? This, sir, is a plain question. It is inferred that our grievances are to be ...
The Virginia House Just Passed a Bill that Bans Assault Weapons–And More .
Josf-Kelley comments on Feb 12, 2020:
When the government is a criminal organization those who run it give orders that must be obeyed without question by those out of government. Those in government say so. Why is this hard to see? The Bill of Rights was never enforced as written, and demonstrated even before the amendments were added to the criminal Constitution of 1789. Look into the Judiciary Act of 1789, which was enforced before amending the criminal Constitution of 1789 with the Bill of Rights. I think it is hard to see the fact that the government from the top down has been taken over by criminals because people think in terms of legal fiction dogma, rather than people thinking in terms of lawful due process. "Does Virginia really believe that their nonsense will “stand”?" One of the first times people fought back (taking a stand) against criminal actions perpetrated by criminals in government was Shays's Rebellion in Massachusetts in 1787 while the Federation was a Federation of Independent States; before the Federation was restructured into a Profitable Monopoly Nation-State Legal Fiction in 1789. The people went to reclaim their guns at the Armory, and an illegal private army of corporate mercenaries cut them off and drove them away: crushing the spirit of liberty in Massachusetts with an Iron Despotic Hand. Some of the patriots were able to escape to a nearby Republic for sanctuary. That was the first test of the right to bear arms in America after the British criminals were driven off by the defenders. Since it was still a federation then, the despotic turning States, like Massachusetts, could sink or swim as it either consented to provide lawful government, grew and prospered as a result, or it failed as a State, turning despotic, and the people ran like slaves to the other States that remained republican in nature. Individuals, not legal fictions, stand on principle. Legal fictions merely cover up the fact that the government is infiltrated with criminals, and once in power, they shut down the law, turning the law into their exclusive power to punish the disobedient. If it were a lawful government, at any level, from the individual, to the family, to the town, city, county, State, or Federation, then individual private prosecutors (non-government regular people) could accuse anyone in office of a crime. The accusation then moves to the next step in lawful due process. The accusation is handed to an individual member of the pool from which a grand jury is formed, a non-government magistrate, or justice of the peace, and that individual then forms an independent grand jury for cause, especially when the accusation involves treason at the highest level of power in government. The next step is for the formed independent grand jury to ...
Democratic Debate groupthink drinks from same frozen ideas... [ammoland.com]
Josf-Kelley comments on Feb 12, 2020:
"Sen. Sanders explained that law-abiding Americans should be forced to surrender fundamental rights over crimes committed by individuals. Sen. Sanders argued that since he and other gun control advocates can’t bring themselves to hold the actual criminals responsible for the crimes they commit, then the rights of all Americans aren’t worthy of Constitutional protections. They should be altered, chipped away and rewritten to match popular moods. This, of course, doesn’t make them rights at all, but privileges granted by a ruling mob, only to be yanked when the winds shift and the group thinks differently." Arbitrary power is the prize, criminals will cut each other's throats to get it.
Twitter discovers the Bloomberg speech he doesn't want you to hear- [bearingarms.com]
Josf-Kelley comments on Feb 11, 2020:
"Odds are good that most voters haven’t ever heard Bloomberg discuss reducing crime by locking up young black guys for non-violent offenses like pot possession, but I’m guessing they’ll be hearing the audio soon enough. It’s important to note, however, that while Bloomberg’s comments are bad, his actual policies are even worse." Yup, Deep State Anti-Trump Candidate Par Excellence!
Anti gun rights activists target 1st Amendment rights of 2A supporters- [bearingarms.com]
Josf-Kelley comments on Feb 11, 2020:
"Gun control advocates aren’t just using litigation, legislation, and regulations to target the right to keep and bear arms. They’re also engaged in a cultural fight to change the hearts and minds of Americans when it comes to gun ownership. They want to de-normalize the exercise of a civil right, and to shame people into disarming, or at least remain silent instead of vocally supporting the right." The sycophants already have their hearts and minds turned off as they read from the false script written by the criminals in government, which include criminals in corporations subsidized by government which is in a word fascism. The threat of disarmament of people, making people defenseless, is not hearts and minds of gullible people. Gullible people will follow any leader willing to give something desired by gullible people. We are not all that gullible as measured by those people who have yet to be disarmed. The threat is armed people willing and able to disarm innocent people as exemplified in such recent examples as the massacre in Waco Texas. Sycophants arriving in your face spitting out slogans written by criminals, parroted by these already turned hearts and minds, may give you a cold, or flu, or if they have a more serious sickness, that may infect you as they spit on you. An army of Sycophants, or mercenaries, ready to shoot you for failing to obey criminal orders without question arriving at your door does often result in you being burned alive by them.
AviationGeek: F-15 vs Foxbat dogfight over Iraq. [theaviationgeekclub.com]
Josf-Kelley comments on Feb 11, 2020:
"The Reformers were adept at marketing their message to Congress and the public. Their slashing, take-no-prisoners style had great appeal for the news media. They were particularly relentless in their attack on the Air Force’s F-15 fighter, which they said was inferior to the less expensive F-16. In fact, some of the Reformers said that what the Air Force really needed was the F-5—a simple day fighter variant of the T-38 trainer aircraft—in substantial numbers." https://www.airforcemag.com/article/0208reformers/ John Boyd revolutionized the American Military. As far as I know the F-15 was shown to be inferior by John Boyd with his relentless efforts to document the facts that matter in Air Combat. Boyd and his Fighter Mafia were behind the move from Higher, Faster, Farther... to actual performance capabilities that win combat. The results included the F-16, F-18 Fighters, and the A-20 Warthog Ground Attack production and deployment.
If this fellow votes the same as he talks then he might be one of the "good" ones (politicians I ...
Josf-Kelley comments on Feb 10, 2020:
"Lucas told the nearly 60 people in audience, including four ABC Stewart students, that he believes gun control laws won’t prevent school shootings, training teachers to use firearms can make schools safer and that a federal court has ruled “police do not have a duty to protect children while they are being slaughtered.”" Ahhh... if police don't have that duty, then who does?
Ever wondered what’s wrong with the world?
Josf-Kelley comments on Feb 10, 2020:
The truth has a way of lighting things up.
“Dear America: You are waking up, as Germany once did, to the awareness that 1/3rd of your ...
Josf-Kelley comments on Feb 10, 2020:
Tactically and Strategically the American situation can be compared to the German situation. Data (could be accurate): "Germany covers an area of approximately 137,847 square miles, while the United States is approximately 3,791,400 square miles. In terms of area, the closest states in the US are Montana, which is slightly bigger than Germany, and New Mexico, which is a bit smaller." Things to consider: America started with a Banker War as the then dominant global power tried to enslave into Debt Slavery all of America. It was very difficult for the largest Military then on the planet to enslave all of America under exclusive control from the British Crown, and the money managers or Central Bank centered in England. The aggressive attacking forces had to cross 3,000 miles of open water, or encourage locals, including Indians, indentured servants, or African slaves to side with the British. If the secondary goal was to cull the herd, so to speak, then that goal was reached, while the primary goal of arbitrary power over all Americans was driven off by the defenders, at least temporarily. America could have become the first non-dictatorial (Top down) area on earth since the Swiss example, but that didn't happen. In 1789 a carbon copy of the British system of legal plunder was put in place, complete with a Central Bank and arbitrary power to extort anything worth stealing from anyone in the "National" interest. That usurpation ensured an American Civil War, another Banker War. Fast forward to the emergence of the Nazi Party, the Bolshevik Party, and the Roosevelt Party. 1. Wall Street and the Rise of Hitler https://archive.org/details/pdfy-lwUqPAGSzT-3bnd3/mode/2up 2. Wall Street and the Bolshevik Revolution http://www.reformation.org/wall-st-bolshevik-rev.html 3. Wall Street and FDR https://archive.org/details/pdfy-FPUkz4pezsfsrVfZ/mode/2up Current measure of POWER: National Debt Clock Real Time https://www.usdebtclock.org/ Will those in the dominant position on Earth buy (invest in) yet another American Civil War? I don't think so. The current battle in America is moving away from the Crazies (neo-cons, globalists, deep state, criminally insane psychopaths) and moving toward Nationalism under Trump et al. That appears to me to be a divorce from cooperation with China to disarm Americans, render America powerless in defense, and no-longer a unification of China and America into one Central Bank controlled Corporation (Limited Liability), run from China: Globalist Agenda, One World Government. That then appears to be a confrontation with China, Trade War, then Military War. The problem with using the past to prepare for the future is such that Modern Warfare is not the same as Warfare in the ...
The democrats have made guns an impossibly divisive issue.
Josf-Kelley comments on Feb 10, 2020:
"The democrats have made guns an impossibly divisive issue. If conservatives don’t like guns, they don’t buy one. "If liberals don’t like guns, they want government to take everyone else’s guns away. I don't wish to credit anyone using the dubious terms Liberal and Conservative, but those who work effectively to disarm a targeted segment of the productive (peaceful) people are criminals who steal whatever can be stolen from those productive people to arm (because they like guns) their Marxists standing army. They like guns, just not in the hands of their targets, they do not like armed targets. They prefer to disarm their targets before enslaving the targets that can be enslaved, or torturing and mass murdering those who won't be slaves. "Politicians and lawyers are professional liars." So, when they say we don't like guns, can that statement be trusted to be a factual statement? Beware of blanket statements and collective punishment. "I believe the majority of them (and corporate CEO’s) are sociopaths." Someone born with a mutated brain, as far as I know, is called a clinical psychopath, and their brain is missing the parts associated with moral conscience, again as far as I know. Those who gain and abuse absolute power undergo a process which effectively rots their brains, as they continue to choose immoral actions, abusing their absolute power over other people: those people, as far as I know, are sociopaths. Then there is an ever growing army of sycophants, where these people may still have functioning moral cognizance, but they pretend that the Emperor is wearing clothes, so long as it is not yet their turn into the meat grinder. The army of sycophants is demonstrated with the story about Stalin speeches where no one would dare stop applauding first for fear of death or a tenner in the Gulag, along with their whole family. "The left wants government to solve every problem, birth to grave. They tax and spend and government grows (it never shrinks)." The Marxists hiding behind a false liberal front lie, as a rule already offered, and those who constitute the army of sycophants read from a script handed down from the Top of the criminal heap, if they use their brains (moral conscience, reason, logic) they are moving out of that group in that moment. They, as a rule, want to steal everything that can be stolen from everyone still able to produce anything worth stealing, including children for body parts or demonic entertainment. That power transfer obviously results in an ever growing criminal gang and an ever shrinking productive slave population, where the last rat will be murdering the second to last rat on that ship sunk by those rats. I think it is fair to say that you too smell a rat, which is not news....
RollingStone: Iowa was Waterloo for Democrats.
Josf-Kelley comments on Feb 9, 2020:
"When historians pore over the Great Iowa Catastrophe of 2020, much of the blame will be focused on Acronym and Shadow, the two firms associated with the balky app that was supposed to count caucus results. For the conspiratorial-minded, the various political connections will be key: Acronym co-founder Tara McGowan is married to Buttigieg strategist Michael Halle, while former Obama campaign manager David Plouffe sits on Acronym’s board. Shadow had also been a client of both the Buttigieg and Biden campaigns in 2019." AND: "Still, if you were black, female, gay, an immigrant, a union member, college-educated, had been to Europe, owned a Paul Klee print or knew Miller’s Crossing was a good movie, you owed Democrats your vote. Why? Because they “got things done.” Now they’re not getting much done, except a lost reputation. That feat at least, they earned. To paraphrase the Joker: What do you get when you cross a political party that’s sold out for decades, with an electorate that’s been abandoned and treated like trash? Answer: What you fucking deserve!" I noticed the Mike Bloomberg add on that page.
Republic vs Democracy
Josf-Kelley comments on Feb 9, 2020:
The word democracy is misused, but putting that aside and rephrasing the question so as to convey the modern misused meaning of democracy, I can then attempt to offer a competitive answer. Original question: "Was the US Civil War the death knell of the Republic and the rise of the Democracy" Rephrased question: Was the US Civil War the death knell of the Republic and the rise of a form of tyranny known as Majority Rules? No. The Republics ended in 1789 when the criminal Federalist Party Unified all the Republics into one Profitable Monopoly Nation State, which then ensured a Civil War. That is the factual answer, it may not be what people want to hear. A Republic is The Public Thing, not the thing used by the Elite to enforce their tyrannical forms of slavery upon everyone. That was once known: Thomas Paine Rights of Man Chapter III Page 176 "As it is necessary to clear away the rubbish of errors, into which the subject of government has been thrown, I will proceed to remark on some others. "It has always been the political craft of courtiers and courtgovernments, to abuse something which they called republicanism; but what republicanism was, or is, they never attempt to explain. let us examine a little into this case. "The only forms of government are the democratical, the aristocratical, the monarchical, and what is now called the representative. "What is called a republic is not any particular form of government. It is wholly characteristical of the purport, matter or object for which government ought to be instituted, and on which it is to be employed, Res-Publica, the public affairs, or the public good; or, literally translated, the public thing. It is a word of a good original, referring to what ought to be the character and business of government; and in this sense it is naturally opposed to the word monarchy, which has a base original signification. It means arbitrary power in an individual person; in the exercise of which, himself, and not the res-publica, is the object. "Every government that does not act on the principle of a Republic, or in other words, that does not make the res-publica its whole and sole object, is not a good government. Republican government is no other than government established and conducted for the interest of the public, as well individually as collectively. It is not necessarily connected with any particular form, but it most naturally associates with the representative form, as being best calculated to secure the end for which a nation is at the expense of supporting it. "Various forms of government have affected to style themselves a republic. Poland calls itself a republic, which is an hereditary aristocracy, with what is called an elective monarchy. ...
Exclusive: Netflix reveals its 9 government takedown requests - Axios
Josf-Kelley comments on Feb 9, 2020:
My comment has to do with the responsibilities and accountability of individuals who abuse the power to produce media. In the past media was speech and print. Then radio, then Television, and now there is what I call Ubiquitous Inter-connectivity, also known as The World Wide Web, and The Internet. Has anyone heard of The Dictator's Dilemma? Specifically this: https://www.rand.org/pubs/rgs_dissertations/RGSD127/sec2.html The Case of the Soviet Union: The Dictator's Dilemma More Specifically this: "The technology of communication has changed and with it, corresponding political biases have shifted. In a broader historical context, advancements in the means of communication have profoundly influenced characteristics within and interactions between societies since the time when language was invented. Writing created permanence; the printing press widened distribution; the telegraph conquered distance; the telephone facilitated interactivity; and television mastered visual images. Now, asynchronous electronic telecommunication networks likewise represent another fundamental, substantial, and discontinuous improvement in the ability to communicate. Modern communication innovations differ from previous technologies in fundamental ways that relatively favor sovereign individuals over sovereign governments. (Wriston, 1993). "If we look for historical precedents for this diffusion of power through information away from the elites, the Renaissance comes to mind" (Builder, 1993: 159). The graphic in Figure 2.1 is helpful in understanding how the dictator's dilemma is a result of advances in communication technologies. The orthogonal axes represent fundamental characteristics of all communications media: Who is able to communicate with whom? Broadcast media, like television, reach large audiences but the ability to broadcast is greatly limited by economic, political and technological constraints. Interactive media, like telephones, can approach universal access, but the number of recipients per message is rarely more than one. Influence increases as more people get the word and autonomy increases with the percentage of the society that can originate and share its own ideas. The dictator's task, to maximize influence while limiting autonomy, used to be easier when technological improvements in telecommunications moved generally in linear paths along the horizontal or vertical axes. The optimal position, from the dictator's perspective, would be in the bottom right-hand corner where everybody receives all of the leader's dictates and none from anyone else. The Jeffersonian democratic ideal resides toward the top right-hand corner where ideas compete in a marketplace comprising many message originators and many recipients. "We the people" ...
What are some examples of functional and dysfunctional hierarchies?
Josf-Kelley comments on Feb 9, 2020:
Shortened quote: "You can see the collapse of reason in the failure to distinguish between citizens and noncitizens, between male and female, between social welfare and a nanny state, between the right and Nazis, between Trump and a dictator, between a republic and a democracy. It's an almost endless list of failures to properly categorise." If the idea for mutual cooperation is a peaceful, productive, adaptive, competitive (not antagonistic or criminal competition), goal that includes the goal of defending the innocent from the guilty, then along the way it might be a good idea to establish some common meanings for words. If on the other hand the goal is to enslave everyone that can produce anything worth stealing, including children for body parts or demonic entertainment, then the same need arises for the members of the group of people seeking to cooperate as a group working to reach that common goal that is exclusively common to those people in that group. If that is difficult to understand, then it may help to consider some of the reasons why people cooperate to reach goals. There are at least 3 obvious benefits - powers - afforded to those who cooperate. 1. Division of Labor 2. Specialization 3. Economies of Scale If the goal is peace, productivity, increases in the standard of living for all of mankind, and at the same time a reduction in the cost of living for everyone also, along with the goal of expediently and effectively defending innocent people, like children, from guilty people, like pedophiles, or baby organ harvesters, or baby human traffickers, then everyone in that group can't be expected to do every single job required to reach that goal, which means that some people would be trial jurors, some people would be grand jurors, some people would be constables, some people would be sheriffs, some people would volunteer to be in temporary defensive military units, some people would make food, some make shelter, some make vehicles, some study and practice medicine, some invent things, on and on, for the benefit of all, the so-called lifting tide that rises all boats. Division of labor, each does not necessarily have to do each job. Specialization, on the other hand, is the individuals unique capacity to out-compete rivals seeking the same division of labor, whereby voluntary associations tend to move the best and brightest at one job to that job, and the best and brightest at a different job naturally flow, voluntarily, to that the job which that individual is better suited. Those who are worst and dullest at one job are best and brightest at another job, and there are not unnatural barriers in place to stop the free travel from worst to best job for each individual when people are free in liberty: the common ...
Jordan Peterson. Munk Debate. "Is Political Correctness a Force For Good?" [youtu.be]
Josf-Kelley comments on Feb 9, 2020:
Who (which individuals and which groups of individuals) seize absolute power and what do they do with it as they begin to abuse it? If "political correctness" was enforced in a free society where people were at liberty, being both responsible and accountable for their actions as individuals, then why would anyone fear anyone else? Why would anyone fear anyone else in a lawful society that effectively accounts for those individuals who abuse power over other individuals? Due process, the actual law, affords everyone injured with a means to redress the injury. A small injury justly demands a small redress, remedy, restitution, or if decided upon the lawful way (trial by the country) a small punishment offered to the one found guilty of causing the injury to the innocent one. In a culture, society, or area on earth occupied by people currently interacting with each other, where there is no law, no due process, and instead there is, in fact, power concentrated into the hands of rival factions willing to cut each other's throat for that prize of absolute power, fear is essential to that tyranny like movement is essential to life. Who (which individuals and which groups of individuals) seize absolute power and what do they do with it as they begin to abuse it? Examples: Abigail Adams to John Adams Braintree, Mass., March 31, 1776 "I have sometimes been ready to think that the passion for liberty cannot be equally strong in the breasts of those who have been accustomed to deprive their fellow creatures of theirs. Of this I am certain that it is not founded upon that generous and Christian principle of doing to others as we would that others should do unto us. . . . " Thomas Jefferson Declaration of Independence "he has waged cruel war against human nature itself, violating it's most sacred rights of life & liberty in the persons of a distant people who never offended him, captivating & carrying them into slavery in another hemisphere, or to incur miserable death in their transportation thither. this piratical warfare, the opprobrium of infidel powers, is the warfare of the CHRISTIAN king of Great Britain. determined to keep open a market where MEN should be bought & sold, he has prostituted his negative for suppressing every legislative attempt to prohibit or to restrain this execrable commerce: and that this assemblage of horrors might want no fact of distinguished die, he is now exciting those very people to rise in arms among us, and to purchase that liberty of which he has deprived them, & murdering the people upon whom he also obtruded them; thus paying off former crimes committed against the liberties of one people, with crimes which he urges them to commit against the lives of another." June 17, 1788 George Mason: "Mr. ...
What are some examples of functional and dysfunctional hierarchies?
Josf-Kelley comments on Feb 9, 2020:
A tale of two types of hierarchies: "In June of 1775, George Washington was appointed Major General and elected by Congress to be commander in chief of the American revolutionary forces. Although he took up his tasks energetically, Washington accomplished nothing militarily for the remainder of the year and more, nor did he try. His only campaign in 1775 was internal rather than external; it was directed against the American army as he found it, and was designed to extirpate the spirit of liberty pervading this unusually individualistic and democratic army of militiamen. In short, Washington set out to transform a people's army, uniquely suited for a libertarian revolution, into another orthodox and despotically ruled statist force after the familiar European model. His primary aim was to crush the individualistic and democratic spirit of the American forces. For one thing, the officers of the militia were elected by their own men, and the discipline of repeated elections kept the officers from forming an aristocratic ruling caste typical of European armies of the period. The officers often drew little more pay than their men, and there were no hierarchical distinctions of rank imposed between officers and men. As a consequence, officers could not enforce their wills coercively on the soldiery. This New England equality horrified Washington's conservative and highly aristocratic soul. To introduce a hierarchy of ruling caste, Washington insisted on distinctive decorations of dress in accordance with minute gradations of rank. As one observer phrased it: "New lords, new laws. … The strictest government is taking place, and great distinction is made between officers and soldier. Everyone is made to know his place and keep it." Despite the great expense involved, he also tried to stamp out individuality in the army by forcing uniforms upon them; but the scarcity of cloth made this plan unfeasible. At least as important as distinctions in decoration was the introduction of extensive inequality in pay. Led by Washington and the other aristocratic southern delegates, and over the objections of Massachusetts, the Congress insisted on fixing a pay scale for generals and other officers considerably higher than that of the rank and file. In addition to imposing a web of hierarchy on the Continental Army, Washington crushed liberty within by replacing individual responsibility by iron despotism and coercion. Severe and brutal punishments were imposed upon those soldiers whose sense of altruism failed to override their instinct for self-preservation. Furloughs were curtailed and girlfriends of soldiers were expelled from camp; above all, lengthy floggings were introduced for all practices that Washington considered esthetically or morally offensive. He...
What are some examples of functional and dysfunctional hierarchies?
Josf-Kelley comments on Feb 9, 2020:
"Right, I could have added some context. What I had in mind was Jordan’s discussion of the roles of the Left and Right in maintaining hierarchies. "Quick summary: the Right’s stance is that hierarchies are necessary and productive. The role of the Left is to watch out for those who are dispossessed by hierarchies, to monitor any tendency towards tyranny or corruption. Ideally, to maintain a healthy hierarchy there is a dialogue, a continual negotiation between Left and Right. "Peterson covers the topic pretty well. I think what you left out was that the left has no borders. It's the borders between things that keep us sane. Open ended definition is chaos or the Yin. You can see the collapse of reason in the failure to distinguish between citizens and noncitizens, between male and female, between social welfare and a nanny state, between the right and Nazis, between Trump and a dictator, between a republic and a democracy. It's an almost endless list of failures to properly categorise. "The left will tell you that openness is associated with intelligence but what they will not tell you is that intelligence is useless without conscientiousness. Genius is not intelligence it is a complex mix of traits." If the actions of those in power routinely result in massive and accurately measurable injuries to innocent people for the benefit of those in power, then there is in that specific hierarchy an obvious if unstated, or if misstated, goal. Example: Goal oriented creator of a hierarchy: G "We are here to help." Producer of anything worth stealing: P "I don't want any help, not unless you want to buy one of my products." G "No, you don't understand, we are here to help, and in return you pay me this amount right here." P "That sounds like extortion to me." G "No, it says so right here, you pay me this amount, and I protect and serve you by ensuring that you pay this amount." If that Elephant in the room is not worthy of discussion, and instead what is worthy of discussion is to combine every single possible hierarchy which is criminal in nature with every single hierarchy which is non-criminal in nature, then two things are likely to happen. 1. The criminal hierarchies will look less criminal, and more power thereby flows to the criminals in power, as the lack of awareness of the true cost of failing to defend against the criminal powers constitutes a loss of defensive power commanded by the victims. 2. The peaceful, productive, adaptive, creative, competitive, hierarchies that exist in liberty, commanded by free people are soiled, dirtied, made to look almost as bad as the criminal hierarchies by a process knowable as collective punishment.
Asking to not shoot unarmed black people is 'anti-police'
Josf-Kelley comments on Feb 9, 2020:
There is a less obvious message in that photo. The sign says "Civil Trial Attorneys" If someone of any color, race, gender, or political ideology, anyone at all, kills an unarmed black man without justification in front of a trial jury in a trial by the country, said killer of the unarmed black man is conceivable as a clear and present danger to yet another unarmed black man, so there would be probable cause for the independent grand jurors in the county in which the unarmed black man was killed, to take command of their civil and criminal jurisdiction, to investigate the killing of the unarmed black man, and if those 25 people agree, independently, to offer the killer a court date before the country, in a trial by the country, then a report is written, a presentment is written, or an indictment is written, and the independent grand jurors order the local magistrate to serve the accused, but presumed to be innocent killer, with a court date. Protect and serve. On the other hand, if the black man is a gang member being shot by a rival black man who is also a gang member, and both are also members of the local police force working as informers, selling drugs to kids at the local schools, as they are ordered to do by their government handlers, then it is entirely possible that the killing will never see the light of a court of law, there won't be a trial by jury, which is trial by the country, where the Public is then generating Public Transcripts of the Public Trial, and the Public can then be aware of the facts that matter in their community. My question has to do with the word Civil in "Civil Trial Attorneys." If it is a clear and present danger to the Public at large, whereby people are killing people for no apparent reason, or for apparent criminal reasons (i.e. murder), then that is a Criminal matter, not a Civil matter. Even if two people involved in the killing, over some personal argument, as in a Duel, then the matter only teeters on the imaginary fence between Civil and Criminal matters. If a corpse shows up at the morgue another one can show up the same way, so the Public, if the Public were served, would find out precisely what happened in that case, or failing to do so, the body count could conceivably increase, and even do so rapidly. How about a modern case in point? There is this guy named Lavoy Finicum, that case could serve the Public at Large, if it were discussed in this context. If that isn't particular enough to the topic, then how about Martin Luther King Jr.? Q. Let me ask you finally -- this has been a long road -- how you regard -- what is your explanation for the fact that there has been such little national media coverage of these -- of this trial and this evidence and this event here in ...
Jordan Peterson. Munk Debate. "Is Political Correctness a Force For Good?" [youtu.be]
Josf-Kelley comments on Feb 8, 2020:
Jordan Peterson time: 22:14 or so: “That’s like, well, look, no hierarchy is without its tyranny, that’s ah, that’s an axiomatic truth. People have recognized that literally for thousands of years, and hierarchies do tend toward tyranny and they tend toward the usurpation by people with power, but that only happens when they become corrupt, and we have mechanisms in our society to stop hierarchies from becoming intolerably corrupt.” No, that is not true, unless the individual telling that narrative agrees that mass murder is tolerably corrupt. Before 1789 the “mechanisms in our society to stop hierarchies from becoming intolerably corrupt” were at least two major mechanisms at odds with each other on opposite sides of a battle field. 1. Bottom up, organic, natural, adaptive, competitive, common law, with independent individuals populating independent grand and trial juries, where regular individuals not paid by the government, not biased by the government, commanded jurisdiction civil and criminal, including the power of subpoena, in the unanimously agreed upon voluntary association for mutual defense. 2. Top down, inorganic, unnatural, despotic, monopolistic, Summary JustUS counterfeit law, with psychopaths, sociopaths, and their ever growing army of sycophants, creating and maintaining the power to steal everything from everyone who can still produce anything worth stealing, including children, and do so with impunity. Previous to the turn to the wrong (despotic) direction in 1789 was the whistle blown by one of the Presidents of the United States of America, Richard Henry Lee. The whistle here is in direct contradiction to the opinion offered by Jordan Peterson concerning those mechanisms. The common law mechanism was usurped soundly by the corrupt people who coined the false label The Federalist Party. "It is not merely the number of impeachments, that are to be expected to make public officers honest and attentive in their business. A general opinion must pervade the community, that the house, the body to impeach them for misconduct, is disinterested, and ever watchful for the public good; and that the judges who shall try impeachments, will not feel a shadow of biass. Under such circumstances, men will not dare transgress, who, not deterred by such accusers and judges, would repeatedly misbehave. We have already suffered many and extensive evils, owing to the defects of the confederation, in not providing against the misconduct of public officers. When we expect the law to be punctually executed, not one man in ten thousand will disobey it: it is the probable chance of escaping punishment that induces men to transgress. It is one important mean to make the government just and honest, rigidly and ...
Jordan Peterson. Munk Debate. "Is Political Correctness a Force For Good?" [youtu.be]
Josf-Kelley comments on Feb 8, 2020:
Wow! Jordan Peterson retold the narrative told by the original American so-called Anarchists in the mid 19th Century. Jordan Peterson actually threw out the term "sovereignty of the individual." This is not news, and I will quote something that was told by one of the original American Anarchists, someone named Stephen Pearl Andrews, when speaking about the so-called Enlightenment. "If this be a correct statement of the essential nature of Protestantism, Democracy, and Socialism, then Protestantism, Democracy, and Socialism are not actuated by three distinct principles at all. They are simply three partial announcements of one generic principle, which lies beneath all these movements, and of which they are the legitimate outgrowths or developments, modified only by the fact of a different application of the same principle. This great generic principle, which underlies every manifestation of that universal unrest and revolution which is known technically in this age as " Progress," is nothing more nor less than " THE SOVEREIGNTY OF THE INDIVIDUAL." Steven Pearl Andrews, The Science of Society, 1888 That (at least to me) is like throwing water on the Wicket Witch of the West.
Jordan Peterson. Munk Debate. "Is Political Correctness a Force For Good?" [youtu.be]
Josf-Kelley comments on Feb 8, 2020:
Before the debate (so-called) there were polls done to find out how many people agree with so-called Political Correctness, and how many people are open minded as to their opinion about agreeing with so-called Political Correctness. My opinion is such that Political Correctness is a slogan, an advertisement, a media sound bite, and a label labeling false propaganda spewed forth from the members of The Cult of Might Makes Right. The meaning of Political Correctness can mean one thing today, and the meaning of Political Correctness can mean the opposite meaning tomorrow, as determined by those who have the power to enforce their opinions upon anyone, doing so with impunity. So the obvious problem with the polls has to do with the nailed down, unchanging, actual, authoritative, singular, official, meaning of Political Correctness. How can someone form an opinion of something that may be one thing one minute and the opposite thing the next minute?
Jordan Peterson. Munk Debate. "Is Political Correctness a Force For Good?" [youtu.be]
Josf-Kelley comments on Feb 8, 2020:
I want to watch this whole video, and I intend to do so next, however I went through the beginning quotes and I think it may be a good idea to comment on those quotes first. There is a natural power inside each individual, and that is a power to choose right from wrong, and so long as that power is not corrupted internally by criminal choices, and so long as that power is not corrupted externally by criminals employing criminal means to criminal ends, then that power of that individual adds to the total lawful power of all the individuals who connect to each other on earth. The freedom to speak is the same as the freedom to breath. It is not given by a group of authorities (authorities of how crime works well when hidden behind fake lawful authority) to a group of non-authorities. This is a fact that matters, and a fact that is proven to be true when someone learns the common law with such agreeable processes as the process of presuming innocence until clear and present dangers indicate probable cause to speak out against those who clearly and presently injure innocent people; especially those who have fake badges, fake authority, and black robes sitting in high chairs lording over everyone. So...at the start this informational media obviously takes a false bend, with this often repeated concept that "freedom of speech" is handed down from the Elite authorities, and given by those Elite authorities, to the lesser worker drones, also known as slaves.
Devin Nunes: Trump has exposed the left-wing socialist media- [americanlookout.com]
Josf-Kelley comments on Feb 8, 2020:
"“The most important thing the president has done — though all the things he’s done are very important — but he’s finally outed the media,” he said." I agree. The steps taken so far out of the Corporate Legal Fiction Box (Subsidized Slavery) have been recently the big move by Ross Perot (Giant Sucking Sound) which was ended with a threat to his daughter while he was gaining in the polls. Then Ron Paul really stepped on the Corporate Legal Fiction Facade and he gained both the support of the Military and the new generations massively, but not reported by Corporate Legal Fiction (LLC) Media. Then Trump blew the lid off the charade, and if someone would have told me 20 years ago that a President of U.S. Inc. (LLC) would out the media, I'd be very skeptical of such a claim back in those days, yet here it is in reality.
James Woods Thinks ‘Nuclear Cockroach’ Hillary Clinton Has ‘Solid Chance’ To Become 2020 ...
Josf-Kelley comments on Feb 8, 2020:
"“Just for giggles, imagine this: the #IowaCauscuses were not a snafu, but an engineered ‘cluster muck’ to keep the #Democrat field wide open. The #ImpeachmentSham was a way to air Biden’s corruption. The chaos leads to a brokered convention. Guess which drunken hag saves the day?” Woods wrote on Twitter." That is the type of out of the box thinking that is, well, out of the box at least.
NRO: Can Bloomberg win the nomination? [nationalreview.com]
Josf-Kelley comments on Feb 8, 2020:
"Nate Silver's forecasting model at FiveThirtyEight gives Bloomberg a less than 1 percent shot at the nomnation. But betting markets disagree: As the degree of Joe Biden's failure in Iowa became apparent, Bloomberg's prospects surged. At PredictIt.org, for instance, Bernie Sanders is the heavy favorite, selling at 43 cents for a potential payoff of a dollar. Bloomberg runs a strong second, at 23 cents. Biden is in fourth place, at a pathetic 14 cents."
Jonathan Haidt. "The Open Mind. Testing America s Righteousness." [youtu.be]
Josf-Kelley comments on Feb 8, 2020:
Time 4:35 or so: "Well the First Amendment grants..." Here is more of the dogma that is excreted by members of The Cult of Might Makes Right. I can translate this type of legalese dogma. What they are saying is that there is an above (faction) that has the power to "grant" power to a lower power. In this case the higher power above grants so-called free speech to so-called terrorist organizations. There are no fictitious beings that terrorize, and there is no higher power that grants a "right" to speak to a Terrorist Group. There are individual human beings that either act responsibly, and are held to account for those responsibilities, or individuals do neither. In this case neither one above is acting responsibly when they grant credence to the legal fiction dogma. These individuals who grant credence to the legal fiction dogma can be held to account for the facts that matter in the case. The First Amendment documents a natural law that embodies human beings. It is a natural law that each individual human being is born with the power to nurture their power of will, and their moral conscience, if they are not born without one: a psychopath is born without the brain parts associated with moral conscience. Having that internal power of will embodied into each human being is then recognized as a power at law - natural law - and each individual viewpoint may be a necessary viewpoint when the goal is to find the whole truth in any matter of controversy at law. Therefore it is a natural consequence recognized by individuals that each individual is thereby born into a world where their individual voice must be heard, if the goal is to reach the highest possible level of truth, in any matter at law. What is not often told by active members of The Cult of Might Makes Right is that the concept of freedom of speech, as it is documented in such documents as the First Amendment to the criminal 1789 Constitution, is that freedom is either the criminal version of freedom, where anyone can do anything they want without consequence to themselves, or freedom is lawful and each decision made by each individual is subject to natural consequences as a matter of fact: the truth. If someone slanders, for example, while speaking falsehoods, then those lies can result in injury to the targets of the slander. If there is no law, then the victim of slander may be inspired to step outside the law and, for example, challenge someone alleged to be a perpetrator of slander to a duel, a violent confrontation agreed upon by both the accuser and the accused. That was the case in which Aaron Burr shot Alexander Hamilton. The natural consequence of slander by Alexander Hamilton injured (according to Aaron Burr) Aaron Burr's political ...
Things are not what they seem [twitter.com]
Josf-Kelley comments on Feb 7, 2020:
https://www.coreysdigs.com/health-science/is-aids-us-90b-taxpayer-dollars-a-global-slush-fund/ • The U.S. Government’s PEPFAR is the largest funder of any nation to a single disease in the world, and the largest donor to the Global Fund, to the tune of over $90 billion to date. Despite this, due to the fact that the Global Fund is located in Geneva, Switzerland, it is not subject to U.S. taxation, jurisdiction, or law. George W. Bush’s 2006 executive order afforded the Global Fund additional exemptions, privileges, and immunities. • Three U.S. Presidents, over 35 governments, the UNDP, the Global Fund, GAVI, and over two dozen major non-profits along with countless smaller ones, have been cashing in for nearly two decades. • Bill and Melinda Gates, Jeffrey Sachs, Kofi Annan, and Amir Attaran are listed as the founders of The Global Fund, but who really strategized and implemented its structure, its funding, and its “immunity” status? • In 2015 USAID awarded Chemonics $9.5 billion to fund these supply chain programs. Only 7% of the drug shipments were delivered on time and in full. This is just one example. There are countless scandals throughout this book. • There are allegedly 23.3 million people on HIV treatment. The new three-in-one pill runs $75/year per person in developing countries. The Clintons, among others, are cashing in on this new drug. An almost identical therapy in the U.S. runs $39,000 per person, per year. The global HIV drugs market exceeded a value of $24.7 billion in 2018.
Aren't you behaving like a morally superior person?
Josf-Kelley comments on Feb 7, 2020:
"We don’t merely overestimate our own moral virtue— we underestimate the moral virtue of those who are not like us." That is the mouse in the pocket dogma from The Cult of Might Makes Right. If the above is an accurate measure of the thinking that goes on in the minds of psychopaths, sociopaths, narcissists, necrophiliacs, and sycophants, then the speaker speaking for his kind does so, and the cost of membership is merely that common thought process common to those groups of people. There are among the human species people who use their capacity to reason logically the data encountered as people connect to and experience other people. A product of that capacity to reason logically are messages that ring true, and are therefore agreeable to some people. 5 examples: 1. "So in everything, do to others what you would have them do to you, for this sums up the Law and the Prophets." 2. If they say, "Come with us, Let us lie in wait for blood, Let us ambush the innocent without cause; Let us swallow them alive like Sheol, Even whole, as those who go down to the pit; We will find all kinds of precious wealth, We will fill our houses with spoil; Throw in your lot with us, We shall all have one purse," My son, do not walk in the way with them. Keep your feet from their path, For their feet run to evil And they hasten to shed blood. Indeed, it is useless to spread the baited net In the sight of any bird; But they lie in wait for their own blood; They ambush their own lives. So are the ways of everyone who gains by violence; It takes away the life of its possessors." 3. "Pilate was not innocent because he washed his hands, and said, He would have nothing to do with the blood of that just one. There are faults of omission as well as commission. When you are legally called to try such a cause, if you shall shuffle out yourself, and thereby persons perhaps less conscientious happen to be made use of, and so a villain escapes justice, or an innocent man is ruined, by a prepossessed or negligent verdict; can you think yourself in such a case wholly blameless? Qui non prohibet cum potest, jubet: That man abets an evil, who prevents it not, when it is in his power. Nec caret scrupulo sosietatis occultae qui evidenter facinori definit obviare: nor can he escape the suspicion of being a secret accomplice, who evidently declines the prevention of an atrocious crime." Englishman’s Right: A Dialogue between a Barrister at Law and a Juryman, John Hawles, 1763 4. "Responsibility must be individual, or there is no responsibility at all." Equitable Commerce by Josiah Warren, 1852 5. "In exchange for these acts of civility, the conqueror acquired some measure of sovereignty over the conquered peoples and, by way of compensation for the ...
US election 2020: Which Democratic candidate will take on Trump? [bbc.com]
Josf-Kelley comments on Feb 7, 2020:
If Super Bowl ads are a valid measure, then Bloomberg will take on Trump.
Buttigieg Says "The Reason That We re Having This Debate Capitalism Vs.
Josf-Kelley comments on Feb 7, 2020:
The words have meanings in context with organized crime. If Capitalism and Socialism were merely the local Mob capitalizing on local businesses, taking their socialist share of the increase in productive wealth, then people would merely call it what it is: organized crime. The reason why people call organized crime Socialism and Capitalism is a result of an obvious Confidence Scheme, or Con Game, and this is well beyond any argument against this fact that matters. The Con Game is that False Flag of "Government" that effectively covers up the hidden fact that both Capitalism and Socialism are examples of organized crime when governments are run by criminals. This is so incredibly far from being subject to any argument whatsoever, that people joke about it. A candidate will joke that if elected the other candidate would be put in jail for obvious crimes, such as the joke about how Jeffery Epstein was just another "Suicide" perpetrated by the Clinton Crime Family. Another joke is the age old joke (this Con Game has been going on for centuries) where the Mobster arrives and demands "Insurance payments." At least the overt Mob dosen't claim that their victims owe a ridiculous (laughable) National Debt. https://www.usdebtclock.org/ U.S. Constitution : Amendments XI - XXVII "The validity of the public debt of the United States, authorized by law, including debts incurred for payment of pensions and bounties for services in suppressing insurrection or rebellion, shall not be questioned." "The judiciary of the United States is so constructed and extended, as to absorb and destroy the judiciaries of the several states; thereby rendering laws as tedious, intricate, and expensive, and justice as unattainable by a great part of the community, as in England; and enabling the rich to oppress and ruin the poor." George Mason, 1787 "But a faction, acting in disguise, was rising in America; they had lost sight of first principles. They were beginning to contemplate government as a profitable monopoly, and the people as hereditary property." To the citizens of the United States by Thomas Paine November 15, 1802 "It was a principle of the Common Law, as it is of the law of nature, and of common sense, that no man can be taxed without his personal consent. The Common Law knew nothing of that system, which now prevails in England, of assuming a man’s own consent to be taxed, because some pretended representative, whom he never authorized to act for him, has taken it upon himself to consent that he may be taxed. That is one of the many frauds on the Common Law, and the English constitution, which have been introduced since Magna Carta. Having finally established itself in England, it has been stupidly and servilely copied ...
A classic example demonstrating that criminals would use any weapon available even if guns were made...
Josf-Kelley comments on Feb 6, 2020:
It is a matter of fact demonstrated often enough that - as a rule - criminals do not obey. In fact - as a rule - in order to be a criminal an individual must - as a rule - not obey. If someone, anyone, obeys, they are thereby not a criminal, as a matter of fact. Therefore, if reason works, or logic, laws are for the obedient, and laws are not for the disobedient. The problem that often presents itself is when criminals take-over the law. When criminals take-over the law - counterfeit law - they make orders that must be obeyed by their victims, while - as a rule - the criminals do not obey those same orders. Why this is at all confusing, one might realize this fact that matters in due time, is that this up-side-down situation - counterfeit law - is an obvious consequence of deception. Those who are fooled: are. "It was a principle of the Common Law, as it is of the law of nature, and of common sense, that no man can be taxed without his personal consent. The Common Law knew nothing of that system, which now prevails in England, of assuming a man’s own consent to be taxed, because some pretended representative, whom he never authorized to act for him, has taken it upon himself to consent that he may be taxed. That is one of the many frauds on the Common Law, and the English constitution, which have been introduced since Magna Carta. Having finally established itself in England, it has been stupidly and servilely copied and submitted to in the United States." Lysander Spooner, Essay on The Trial by Jury, 1852
Founding Father wokeness and socialism for Republicans: the Constitutional foundation of every ...
Josf-Kelley comments on Feb 6, 2020:
“Perhaps most startling and suggestive of our disintegration, we are at war over our president in a historically unprecedented way.” No. The individual currently occupying the National President office is not mine, so that individual cannot be “ours.” As to the cause of conflict between factions it is historically well known that a National (Profitable Monopoly) head will inspire people to gain control of that particular example of arbitrary power. That was explained well enough during the criminal take-over of the existing, lawful, Federation, by the Nationalists in 1787 through 1789. Here: New Constitution Creates A National Government; Will Not Abate Foreign Influence; Dangers Of Civil War And Despotism Maryland Gazette and Baltimore Advertiser, March 7, 1788 “There are but two modes by which men are connected in society, the one which operates on individuals, this always has been, and ought still to be called, national government; the other which binds States and governments together (not corporations, for there is no considerable nation on earth, despotic, monarchical, or republican, that does not contain many subordinate corporations with various constitutions) this last has heretofore been denominated a league or confederacy. The term federalists is therefore improperly applied to themselves, by the friends and supporters of the proposed constitution. This abuse of language does not help the cause; every degree of imposition serves only to irritate, but can never convince. They are national men, and their opponents, or at least a great majority of them, are federal, in the only true and strict sense of the word. “Whether any form of national government is preferable for the Americans, to a league or confederacy, is a previous question we must first make up our minds upon. . . . “That a national government will add to the dignity and increase the splendor of the United States abroad, can admit of no doubt: it is essentially requisite for both. That it will render government, and officers of government, more dignified at home is equally certain. That these objects are more suited to the manners, if not [the] genius and disposition of our people is, I fear, also true. That it is requisite in order to keep us at peace among ourselves, is doubtful. That it is necessary, to prevent foreigners from dividing us, or interfering in our government, I deny positively; and, after all, I have strong doubts whether all its advantages are not more specious than solid. We are vain, like other nations. We wish to make a noise in the world; and feel hurt that Europeans are not so attentive to America in peace, as they were to America in war. We are also, no doubt, desirous of cutting a figure in history. Should ...
Controversial post of the week, your thoughts?
Josf-Kelley comments on Feb 5, 2020:
If socialism is defined as "too each according to their need from each according to their ability," then any involuntary tax, or transfer of power from those who produce it to those who steal it and then buy members of their growing army of sycophants, is so-called and so-defined socialism. "It was a principle of the Common Law, as it is of the law of nature, and of common sense, that no man can be taxed without his personal consent. The Common Law knew nothing of that system, which now prevails in England, of assuming a man’s own consent to be taxed, because some pretended representative, whom he never authorized to act for him, has taken it upon himself to consent that he may be taxed. That is one of the many frauds on the Common Law, and the English constitution, which have been introduced since Magna Carta. Having finally established itself in England, it has been stupidly and servilely copied and submitted to in the United States." Lysander Spooner, Essay on The Trial by Jury, 1852
Good. Senate votes to acquit Trump on all charges... [reason.com]
Josf-Kelley comments on Feb 5, 2020:
"In a near party-line vote, senators rejected the abuse of power article 52-48 and the obstruction of Congress article 53-47. The only defection was Sen. Mitt Romney (R–Utah), who broke with the GOP and voted to convict Trump on the former charge, making him the first senator to ever support removing a president from his or her own party. The move undercut Trump's argument that his impeachment was completely partisan and not supported by any Republicans." All members of the Deep State raise your hand.
Trump impeachment acquittal on track ahead of Senate vote By LISA MASCARO and MARY CLARE JALONICK ...
Josf-Kelley comments on Feb 5, 2020:
The New Paper February 5, 2020 “You may not deceptively share synthetic or manipulated media that are likely to cause harm.” —Twitter, announcing new rules to limit altered media on its platform "5. The Senate will vote today (at 4pm ET) on whether to convict or acquit President Trump in his ongoing impeachment trial. A vote for acquittal along party lines is largely expected as several key moderate Republican Senators (i.e., votes sought by the Democratic minority) argue that the president’s actions at hand are inappropriate but not impeachable." https://www.thenewpaper.co/r?r=jlb8z4jokbe
[youtu.be]
Josf-Kelley comments on Feb 5, 2020:
"This isn't the first time I've been shut down for exposing child abuse offenses." To me the following information is important in this context: The Conviction Factory, The Collapse of America's Criminal Courts, by Roger Roots Page 40 Private Prosecutors "For decades before and after the Revolution, the adjudication of criminals in America was governed primarily by the rule of private prosecution: (1) victims of serious crimes approached a community grand jury, (2) the grand jury investigated the matter and issued an indictment only if it concluded that a crime should be charged, and (3) the victim himself or his representative (generally an attorney but sometimes a state attorney general) prosecuted the defendant before a petit jury of twelve men. Criminal actions were only a step away from civil actions - the only material difference being that criminal claims ostensibly involved an interest of the public at large as well as the victim. Private prosecutors acted under authority of the people and in the name of the state - but for their own vindication. The very term "prosecutor" meant criminal plaintiff and implied a private person. A government prosecutor was referred to as an attorney general and was a rare phenomenon in criminal cases at the time of the nation's founding. When a private individual prosecuted an action in the name of the state, the attorney general was required to allow the prosecutor to use his name - even if the attorney general himself did not approve of the action. Private prosecution meant that criminal cases were for the most part limited by the need of crime victims for vindication. Crime victims held the keys to a potential defendant's fate and often negotiated the settlement of criminal cases. After a case was initiated in the name of the people, however, private prosecutors were prohibited from withdrawing the action pursuant to private agreement with the defendant. Court intervention was occasionally required to compel injured crime victims to appear against offenders in court and "not to make bargains to allow [defendants] to escape conviction, if they...repair the injury." The point being such that The People as a whole constitute both The Country and The Public Government (Res-publica means The Public Thing in fact: the origin of the word Republic is a literal meaning of The Public Thing from that original human development), and unlike the modern opposite meanings of these words the original meanings prove, beyond doubt, that the people as a whole are, in fact, the government. When the people abdicate their responsibilities as The Public Thing (Respublica), segments of the population take over, as a matter of demonstrable fact time and time again. Those most likely people likely to engineer a...
[youtu.be]
Josf-Kelley comments on Feb 5, 2020:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2x91H3eFKVI=emb_logo
About time... [youtu.be]
Josf-Kelley comments on Feb 5, 2020:
May 22, 2018
[bbc.co.uk] What's the difference between funding and a grant
Josf-Kelley comments on Feb 2, 2020:
"Some production companies (not in-house ones) apply for grants that may be part-funded by the EU, which provide incentives to make programmes in particular regions of the UK." In context the words mean a transfer of power from a collective account (loot) to investors who have invested in the collection process (aid and abet).
[m.
Josf-Kelley comments on Feb 2, 2020:
See also the work of Anthony Sutton: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jnoXDhbE6C8
A free country is an oxy moron.
Josf-Kelley comments on Feb 2, 2020:
"A free country is an oxy moron." The word country has been used to mean many different things. Trial by the country, for example, is another way to say trial by jury according to the common law. Country can also mean a legal fiction, or corporate being, such as The State. If the former (trial by the country) is the intended meaning, then the country means the people who live within a geographical area. Those people in that area are said to be the country. "Trial by the country, and no taxation without consent, were the two pillars of English liberty, (when England had any liberty,) and the first principles of the Common Law. They mutually sustain each other; and neither can stand without the other. Without both, no people have any guaranty for their freedom; with both, no people can be otherwise than free." Lysander Spooner, Essay on The Trial by Jury, 1852 There are the words of a so-called American Anarchist writing about the historical use of the word country in the context of government by the people, which is government according to ancient law: legem terrae, the law of the land, also called the common law. If on the other hand the word country is used to designate a Legal Fiction, such as a Corporate Entity, as Nation-State, or a group of individuals who monopolize power and profit at the expense of anyone who dares to make anything worth stealing, then the word "country" is not the same as the previous, ancient usage. Which is it? "A free country is an oxy moron." I think it is clear that the use of the word country above is the later meaning whereby a "country" is a legal fiction. "Democratic freedom is an oxy moron." The same confusion can occur when using the word "democratic." The ancient meaning is not the same as the modern legal fiction meaning. Which meaning is intended? If the legal fiction meaning is intended then the statement can read: "A free legal fiction is an oxy moron." What is a legal fiction? If as demonstrated by the legal fiction known as U.S. (LLC), then it is not free as reported in the following enforced dictate: "The validity of the public debt of the United States, authorized by law, including debts incurred for payment of pensions and bounties for services in suppressing insurrection or rebellion, shall not be questioned." That is a derivative of the previous dictate: "To provide for calling forth the militia to execute the laws of the union, suppress insurrections and repel invasions:" 2 examples of how those dictates were enforced are provided in The Whiskey Rebellion Proclamation of 1794: "Therefore, and in pursuance of the proviso above recited, I. George Washington, President of the United States, do hereby command all persons, being insurgents, ...
Political Links [ootikof.
Josf-Kelley comments on Feb 1, 2020:
Steve Pieczenik Talks https://stevepieczenik.com/
The Mainstream Media Mogul with the former Number 1 show on primetime television, Donald Trump ...
Josf-Kelley comments on Feb 1, 2020:
"You really think NBC hates their former TV star?" People use the terms White Hat and Black Hat these days. There is no such thing as NBC whereby NBC can hate, or think, or act. NBC is not one thing having human attributes, such as the power of will. I get the message, perhaps. Overall the Deep State (Crazies, or neo-CONS) is led by a common desire for absolute dictatorial power to do whatever they please to whoever they please without consequence: a shared pathology. The lesser evil is embodied by so-called White Hat Nationalists, as exemplified by Donald Trump. What ever happened to rule of law? You know, the home of brave and the land of the free?
After watching a YouTube video on the decentralization of government, I’m finding myself intrigued...
Josf-Kelley comments on Jan 31, 2020:
“Psychopaths poses traits very useful to those who desire power. The best way to deal with the threat that these people pose is to limit the power they can obtain, and thus the damage they can do, and again this is best achieved through decentralization.” Narrator Look for example George Washington, Alexander Hamilton, Robert Morris, and John Adams who were all members of the Nationalist Party hidden behind a false Federalist Party fraud. “There is nothing in the constitution of men or states that can prevent the rise of dictators...Power maniacs exist everywhere...The only difference lies in the degree of tyrannical government which, in turn, depends once more on the size of power of the countries falling victims to it.” (Leopold Kohr, The Breakdown of Nations) The size of the group of people wanting government (look into the work of Thomas Paine) merely demands a representative form instead of a democratic form. “Not all people desire to live in communities organized under the same social institutions. Some people favor free markets, while others believe that socialism is a far more just way to organize a society.” Narrator Wrong, the problem is that some people favor criminal forms of government (involuntary association also known as “subsidized slavery”...), while other people favor voluntary associations for mutual defense, or for other reasons, with the basic principle of voluntary association as the foundation of government. “If freedom of choice is considered an advantage economically, why not also politically? For, with a great multitude of systems prevailing in an area inhabited by hundreds of millions of people, it becomes mathematically inevitable that far more individuals are able to obtain what their hearts desire than if the same region were to permit only a single system, even as in a restaurant many more people can obtain satisfaction if the menu includes a great variety of dishes rather than a single one which can be made palatable to all only through the propaganda of the cook.” (Leopold Kohr) Again, those who favor involuntary association (subsidized slavery) are criminals, and they gain power by criminal means, including deception, threat of aggressive violence, and very well demonstrated aggressive violence by criminals upon victims. If people conflate involuntary association with voluntary association, as if both are the same thing, then people will confuse actual government, based upon actual law power, with the opposite, which is counterfeit government, fake government, and RULE BY CRIMINAL MEANS. If people conflate the two then two obvious results are: 1. Actual government, and actual law, which is voluntary association, grows weaker as people confuse the actual government ...
After watching a YouTube video on the decentralization of government, I’m finding myself intrigued...
Josf-Kelley comments on Jan 31, 2020:
"Governments are responsible..." That is a fundamental falsehood. If the deceiver can convince the target to blame something rather than the actual person or persons responsible, then the deceiver can escape accountability. I want to listen to the whole message, but it sure does start off on a foundation made of quick sand. The reason for "decentralization" in lawful matters (government) is the natural law that places human moral conscience in individuals. Centralization (so-called) is a method of deception, by which the deceivers convince the targets that "collective" conscience (as enforced by specific people) over-rules individual conscience. The individual is subject to the dictates of those people who claim to speak for everyone: The State. This is why natural law tends to cause people to invent such processes as Trial by The Country, also known as The Law of the Land, which is trial by jury and the common law. Each individual in a group (society) is afforded the power to nullify any claim of authority by anyone, anywhere, anytime. Therefore the individual sovereign commander of the law power is supreme. The individual is supreme and The State is subject to the individual: decentralization. I hope that helps.
American politics has become such a freak show this is nothing surprising, a presidential candidate ...
Josf-Kelley comments on Jan 30, 2020:
"Warren Says Her Education Secretary Must Meet Trans Child’s Approval" Self-evident pathology Nation Wide My response is for anyone with a working conscience to consider returning to actual rule of law, along with a federal agreement instead of this bogus Nation-State. Reclaiming the American Revolution: The Kentucky and Virginia Resolutions and Their Legacy by William Watkins "Second, federalism permits the states to operate as laboratories of democracy-to experiment with various policies and Programs. For example, if Tennessee wanted to provide a state-run health system for its citizens, the other 49 states could observe the effects of this venture on Tennessee's economy, the quality of care provided, and the overall cost of health care. If the plan proved to be efficacious other states might choose to emulate it, or adopt a plan taking into account any problems surfacing in Tennessee. If the plan proved to be a disastrous intervention, the other 49 could decide to leave the provision of medical care to the private sector. With national plans and programs, the national officials simply roll the dice for all 284 million people of the United States and hope they get things right. Experimentation in policymaking also encourages a healthy competition among units of government and allows the people to vote with their feet should they find a law of policy detrimental to their interests. Using again the state-run health system as an example, if a citizen of Tennessee was unhappy with Tennessee's meddling with the provisions of health care, the citizen could move to a neighboring state. Reallocation to a state like North Carolina, with a similar culture and climate, would not be a dramatic shift and would be a viable option. Moreover, if enough citizens exercised this option, Tennessee would be pressured to abandon its foray into socialized medicine, or else lose much of its tax base. To escape a national health system, a citizen would have to emigrate to a foreign country, an option far less appealing and less likely to be exercised than moving to a neighboring state. Without competition from other units of government, the national government would have much less incentive than Tennessee would to modify the objectionable policy. Clearly, the absence of experimentation and competition hampers the creation of effective programs and makes the modification of failed national programs less likely."
Politico: The Democrats' Bernie dilemma. [politico.com]
Josf-Kelley comments on Jan 30, 2020:
"We can’t know today whether Sanders could blaze a Trump-like path to the White House. We do know that the Republican acquiescence to Trump in 2016 changed the complexion of the GOP, perhaps for a generation. How Democrats react to the rise of Sanders today may similarly determine what kind of party they are going to be." Suppose there are people who merely vote as they are told by the "Party." How many are those in that group as a percentage of those who actually vote? More to the point, of those who follow orders without question how many of those votes are counted and applied to the actual decision to put an individual in the U.S. President position? For the life of me I can't see a confessed "Socialist" moved by any force into the office of U.S. President. It makes no sense at all to me. Bloomberg fits as a potential rival to Trump. If Trump is Deep State Light, or someone not yet completely lost to necrophilia, then it makes sense to me that The Deep State (trademark) would excrete a viable Anti-Trump candidate: a Killary II. Sanders is a self-evident joke. Bloomberg, at least to me, is potentially that Dark Horse, that proverbial "Anti-Christ" type model that fits the current narrative. I'm not intending to be "Biblical" with this comment. The powers at play are what they are, and they are powerFULL, not weak, stupid, and farcical. As to my use of the word "necrophilia," the meaning intended has nothing to do with fornicating with dead people. The word "necrophilia" was once employed by a man named Erich Fromm in his work that includes 2 books I have read: 1. Sane Society 2. The Anatomy of Human Destructiveness. Necrophilia is a word that can describe a specific pathology by which people worship death. Not their own death, mind you, rather a necrophiliac worships the death of all other life other than their own sick one.
Entrenched oligarchy infiltrated by America’s enemies.
Josf-Kelley comments on Jan 30, 2020:
History shows that free societies remain free when the people as a whole maintain their lawful jurisdiction to investigate and indict all enemies foreign and domestic. That is the message in both the Declaration of Independence and the Bill of Rights. Unfortunately the people as a whole are stupified into accepting servility. "It was a principle of the Common Law, as it is of the law of nature, and of common sense, that no man can be taxed without his personal consent. The Common Law knew nothing of that system, which now prevails in England, of assuming a man’s own consent to be taxed, because some pretended representative, whom he never authorized to act for him, has taken it upon himself to consent that he may be taxed. That is one of the many frauds on the Common Law, and the English constitution, which have been introduced since Magna Carta. Having finally established itself in England, it has been stupidly and servilely copied and submitted to in the United States." Lysander Spooner, Essay on The Trial by Jury, 1852 Not until there is a general increase in lawful knowledge will the people regain their lawful power to hold the criminals in so-called government to an accurate accounting of the facts that matter. THE COURT: Let me ask you, do all of you agree with this verdict? THE JURY: Yes (In unison). THE COURT: In answer to the question did Loyd Jowers participate in a conspiracy to do harm to Dr. Martin Luther King, your answer is yes. Do you also find that others, including governmental agencies, were parties to this conspiracy as alleged by the defendant? Your answer to that one is also yes. And the total amount of damages you find for the plaintiffs entitled to is one hundred dollars. Is that your verdict? THE JURY: Yes (In unison). https://thekingcenter.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/12/King_Family_Trial_Transcript.pdf
Seems Legit
Josf-Kelley comments on Jan 29, 2020:
They have nothing on the Federalist Party.
IDW. Jordan Peterson. "The Psychology Of Identity." [youtu.be]
Josf-Kelley comments on Jan 29, 2020:
"Perhaps the Play is not worth the Candle." If the cause for "arming to the teeth" is absolute power to do whatever the winnner wants to do to everyone else, then that is part of The Cult of Might Makes Right Dogma. Kill or be killed, and do unto others that which you would "arm to the teeth" to avoid having done to self. Hypocricy put effectively in place of (counterfeiting) the truth.
The state of West Virginia has passed a resolution reminding Virginia counties opposed to leftist ...
Josf-Kelley comments on Jan 29, 2020:
That is very good news, thanks.
The Bosnian Pyramids: One of the Greatest Finds Ever? | Ancient Origins
Josf-Kelley comments on Jan 29, 2020:
"Chambers and connecting passages were discovered and by the following spring of 2019 it was found that the raised floor within the open section was rich in archaeological material. Over the course of the 2019 summer season, over 3000 individual finds were recovered from the Ravne3 Tunnels. Pottery fragments, tiles, jewelry, coins, tools and lithic artifacts were excavated." Also: "Numerous websites and Wikipedia entries calling the Bosnian Pyramids a “pseudo-archaeological notion” were set up to misinform the curious public, sometimes through omission, other times through deceit, spin and outright lies. It seemed that while there were plenty of people ready to attack Dr Osmanagich on a personal level, no one was arguing directly against Dr Osmanagich’s raised proofs in an objective, scientific manor on a fair playing field." People state with authority that Jeffery Epstein committed suicide. Authority of lies is counterfeit authority of truth.
[pjmedia.
Josf-Kelley comments on Jan 28, 2020:
"This web of powerful donors helps explain how the transgender movement seemingly captured the commanding heights of American culture overnight. For instance, while endocrinologists (doctors who specialize in hormone glands) like Dr. Michael Laidlaw have warned that transgender "treatments" like so-called puberty-blockers and opposite-sex hormones actually introduce a disease into the bodies of healthy children, the medical establishment has rushed to embrace these "treatments" as "best practices." If it is a crime, why call it something other than a crime?
Libertarians Forged an Alliance With Brazilian President Jair Bolsonaro.
Josf-Kelley comments on Jan 27, 2020:
Liberarianism isn't another form of statism, so either it isn't libertarianism, or it isn't statism in this example. In other words: Libertarians advised the statists to stop stealing from everyone who still manages to produce anything worth stealing despite the statist malinvestments done with their stolen loot. Statists responded OK.
Still going on but cencored on Facebook [balkaninsight.com]
Josf-Kelley comments on Jan 26, 2020:
“Judging by this vocabulary and its intensity, Gruevski is launching a purge which should end in the banning of the Open Society Foundation – Macedonia, and if possible, of the Social Democrats, too,” Spasov wrote on Facebook." Good article, thanks. See also: https://idw.community/group/NewsFromAllViews/post/72336/https-youtu-be-ncdzqmgjym0-the-puppet-strings-are-more-and-more-obvious
Space Force and the Deep State .
Josf-Kelley comments on Jan 26, 2020:
"We didn't want to lie to you for eighty years, but we had to so we could protect you." Good article, thanks. Perhaps also along the counter-coup lines: https://stevepieczenik.com/2020/01/14/opus-205-iran-now/
[youtu.be] The puppet strings are more and more obvious
Josf-Kelley comments on Jan 26, 2020:
The veil is thinning, so the power of falsehood is evaporating. Will the rats grow ever more desperate?
While there is so much culture war and religious war going on (and many are even predicting the ...
Josf-Kelley comments on Jan 26, 2020:
That is pure bullshit. The original federation was founded on adaptive free-market choices including a free market of governments, and a free market of religions. The Nation-State that replaced the original federation (1789) was the opposite in all cases. The religion enforced after 1789 was, and still is Statism also known as Nationalism, and it is the same religion as Communism, Fascism, and all the other isms. The Legal Fiction is sovereign, and you are not.
Jordan Peterson. "The Death and Resurrection Of Christ." [youtu.be]
Josf-Kelley comments on Jan 26, 2020:
I managed to get a third of the way through before investing my time and energy into the action of commenting. I am commenting for the cause described so far by this Story Line offered by Jordan Peterson. The cause being an individual effort of action intending to move individuals from lower quality and higher cost life to higher quality and lower cost life: the power rising the tide that lifts all boats. The Story Line apparently assumes a net total of value (things) that is scarce, meaning not enough good things for too many individuals wanting good things. I derive that conclusion from the choice by Jordan Peterson to use the word sacrifice, rather than to choose the word investment. If instead of a Story Line that assumes scarcity the Story Line assumes abundance (or a balance rather than the scale being tipped either way at the start of the story), then investment would clearly be the accurate word choice, more accurate (higher quality and lower cost) than the word sacrifice. People invest some of the current bounty so as to avoid spoilage of the current bounty, preserving and improving the current bounty, so as to ensure even greater bounty in the future. That is the Story Line adjusted from an assumption of "original sin" (or scarcity) to original bounty: abundance. Those who set the goal posts can be trusted to set the goal post in their favor? Power invested wisely results in more power, not less.
This says it all. [babylonbee.com]
Josf-Kelley comments on Jan 25, 2020:
“At publishing time, Paul had decided he would try democratic stepping on a rake, where his friends wall vote on whether he steps on the rake, and then he steps on it and smacks his face.” That is called stepping on a rake as a consequence of the results of a vote put to friends. That is not democracy, and it isn't socialism. If socialism is expressed as a power transfer - which it often is - then to each according to their needs goes the power that was produced by those who were able to produce anything worth stealing. If it is stealing, then it is stealing. Why call it democracy or socialism? How about the same rake analogy applied to people who call something by a name other than what actually happens? There goes a gang of socialists, says the anti-socialist pointing at a gang of thieves. The thieves point back and claim that there goes a gang of capitalists as they point back at the other gang of thieves. The idea, apparently, is to convince the members of one gang to abandon their gang and move to the other gang on the way to the pretend ballot box.
Two views of the interim trade agreement with China. [ft.com] [thefederalist.com]
Josf-Kelley comments on Jan 25, 2020:
Source A: "Become an FT subscriber to read:" A partial and defective US-China trade truce" Note that the above is a cost charged to those who want cost-less transfers of powerful stuff: Free Trade. I did not pay the cost, so I moved onto the competition Source B, which costs-less: The Phase One U.S. - China Trade Deal Is A Serious Win for The United States by Helen Raleigh, January 24, 2020 "The Trump administration stopped calling China a currency manipulator." And: "The two countries have such different economic and political systems and, more importantly, such different sets of values that we may have to settle our differences through other means, far beyond a trade agreement." And: "This Phase One deal leaves many U.S. strategic goals out, including addressing the Chinese government’s enormous subsidies to state-owned enterprises." That to me is all a bunch of bullshit. The Corporation called U.S. has a subsidiary called The FED. The FED is Subsidized Slavery of Everyone, and that is U.S. Corporate Policy, has been since 1789. So Trump goes to China as a Master of Slaves to “negotiate” with whoever is the Master of Slaves in that part of the world, and these 2 Masters of Slaves have a pissing contest? The contest can be measured like measuring the stream of piss, but the accurate measure isn’t which Master is more Free at Trading, the accurate measure is called Purchasing Power Parity, or Currency Exchange Rate, or even Trade Surplus. Who get’s to slice up the African Continent? How about South America; someone coined the term The Backyard for a reason. I’m the one on crack? Here is a measure of a “state-owned enterprise” receiving “enormous subsidies”: https://www.usdebtclock.org/ Liability Per Citizen 386,963.00 and counting Which form of "Free Trade" costs less, to who, and who is getting the benefits of that competitive form of "Free Trade"?
The DNC won't let you elect Bernie Sanders.
Josf-Kelley comments on Jan 25, 2020:
"A vote for Trump is a vote for a future of free democratic elections." I don't think that the above is true, and I don't think that a case can be made to prove that it is true. In the first place there is no way to prove something that is ambiguous. I'd like to see someone give it a try. Elections, for example, are not democratic, so there is that to contend with when proving this statement. The Athenian Constitution: Government by Jury and Referendum by Roderick T. Long "The practice of selecting government officials randomly (and the Athenians developed some fairly sophisticated mechanical gadgets to ensure that the selection really was random, and to make cheating extremely difficult) is one of the most distinctive features of the Athenian constitution. We think of electoral politics as the hallmark of democracy; but elections were almost unknown at Athens, because they were considered paradigmatically anti-democratic. Proposals to replace sortition with election were always condemned as moves in the direction of oligarchy. "Why? Well, as the Athenians saw it, under an electoral system no one can obtain political office unless he is already famous: this gives prominent politicians an unfair advantage over the average person. Elections, they thought, favor those wealthy enough to bribe the voters, powerful enough to intimidate the voters, flashy enough to impress the voters, or clever enough to deceive the voters. The most influential political leaders were usually Horsemen anyway, thanks to their social prominence and the political following they could obtain by dispensing largesse among the masses. (One politician, Kimon, won the loyalty of the poor by leaving his fields and orchards unfenced, inviting anyone who was hungry to take whatever he needed.) If seats on the Council had been filled by popular vote, the Horsemen would have disproportionately dominated it — just as, today, Congress is dominated by those who can afford expensive campaigns, either through their own resources or through wealthy cronies. Or, to take a similar example, in the United States women have had the vote for over half a century, and yet, despite being a majority of the population, they represent only a tiny minority of elected officials. Obviously, the persistence of male dominance in the economic and social sphere has translated into women mostly voting for male candidates. The Athenians guessed, probably rightly, that the analogous prestige of the upper classes would lead to commoners mostly voting for aristocrats. "That is why the Athenians saw elections as an oligarchical rather than a democratic phenomenon. Above all, the Athenians feared the prospect of government officials forming a privileged class with separate interests of their ...
There is a very simple solution to striking teachers.
Josf-Kelley comments on Jan 25, 2020:
I think that there is a fundamental problem at work that may not be obvious despite all the evidence that ought to expose this fundamental problem. Will disobedient people become obedient if they are given yet another order to be obeyed obediently?
Agorism = peacefully boycotting the government, refusing to pay tax wherever possible
Josf-Kelley comments on Jan 25, 2020:
If it isn't voluntary, then don't pay it. If it isn't voluntary, then it is a crime scene. Why call it a tax if it isn't voluntary?>
Jordan Peterson. "Slaying the Dragon Within Us." [youtu.be]
Josf-Kelley comments on Jan 25, 2020:
There is no such thing as an industrial complex.
Here's why libertarians are resistant to global outrage - [babylonbee.com]
Josf-Kelley comments on Jan 24, 2020:
The Wizard behind the curtain isn't outraged, at least not while the con works.
IntellectualTakeout: Bonhoeffer on the stupidity that led to Hitler's rise.
Josf-Kelley comments on Jan 24, 2020:
From the Article: "“Upon closer observation, it becomes apparent that every strong upsurge of power in the public sphere, be it of a political or a religious nature, infects a large part of humankind with stupidity. … The power of the one needs the stupidity of the other. The process at work here is not that particular human capacities, for instance, the intellect, suddenly atrophy or fail. Instead, it seems that under the overwhelming impact of rising power, humans are deprived of their inner independence and, more or less consciously, give up establishing an autonomous position toward the emerging circumstances. The fact that the stupid person is often stubborn must not blind us to the fact that he is not independent. In conversation with him, one virtually feels that one is dealing not at all with him as a person, but with slogans, catchwords, and the like that have taken possession of him. He is under a spell, blinded, misused, and abused in his very being. Having thus become a mindless tool, the stupid person will also be capable of any evil and at the same time incapable of seeing that it is evil. This is where the danger of diabolical misuse lurks, for it is this that can once and for all destroy human beings.”" The power to control the minds of many people, to make them choose external rather than internal judgement, involves more than internal stupidity. The often repeated saying "follow the money" applies when people shed their stupidity and people regain access to their own moral conscience: their own power to judge truth from fiction, right from wrong. A quick look (or a long long) into the work of Anthony Sutton and John Taylor Gatto can help anyone gather facts that matter in this specific case involving people led to believe a lie to the point at which people give up their own power of accurate discernment. Anthony Sutton: 1. Wall Street and the rise of Hitler 2. Wall Street and the Bolshevik Revolution 3. Wall Street and FDR https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wi5R9WI6_w0
"Vices are those acts by which a man harms himself or his property.
Josf-Kelley comments on Jan 24, 2020:
Reading through the work of Lysander Spooner is refreshing in a world were mountains of official government lies are routinely believed and enforced. Not only does the information offer that refreshing light of truth, it offers the lawful means to the lawful ends. "The question, then, between trial by jury, as thus described, and trial by the government, is simply a question between liberty and despotism. The authority to judge what are the powers of the government, and what the liberties of the people, must necessarily be vested in one or the other of the parties themselves - the government, or the people; because there is no third party to whom it can be entrusted. If the authority be vested in the government, the government is absolute, and the people have no liberties except such as the government sees fit to indulge them with. If, on the other hand, that authority be vested in the people, then the people have all liberties, (as against the government,) except such as substantially the whole people (through a jury) choose to disclaim; and the government can exercise no power except such as substantially the whole people (through a jury) consent that it may exercise." Essay on The Trial by Jury, Lysander Spooner, 1852
Lying Liars – Deceiving Psychopaths: I’ve been reading opinions about how the Trial of ...
Josf-Kelley comments on Jan 23, 2020:
The Biggest Game in the Biggest Town. For those who have gone through at least some of the information offered by Walter Burien from his initial YouTube presentation titled The Biggest Game in Town, Comprehensive Annual Financial Reports, there is in that a useful scale. Take any incorporated city in America (incorporating all the psychopaths into one power cell) and follow the money to find those cult members and evaluate that amount of Power by those Units of Power. 1 City - 1 Million Federal Reserve Notes on Account 1 State - 1 Billion Federal Reserve Notes on Account 1 Nation State Corporate Legal Fiction (falsely called a federation) - Unlimited Spending Power So... as pointed out in comments: [“Regular” people rarely win.] Regular people win or starve, or beg, or join the cult and get a piece of the action: incorporated into the fold, in that corporate structure. The point being that there is plenty of POWER available to swing as many votes as needed to get rid of anyone that is not wanted, anywhere, anytime. By hook, by crook, by Impeachment, by Lone Gunman soon be be suicided, or by anything other than simply ignoring the unwanted party crasher, the Elephant in the Room, or the Emperor who dares to actually wear clothes.
Ranking Democrat Senator Dianne Feinstein Left Senate During Schiff Testimony – Said ...
Josf-Kelley comments on Jan 23, 2020:
I don't think that it is true that the future is predictable by reason and logic in this case, or any case involving groups of mentally ill cult members. Psychopaths can be trusted to lie when a lie will work in favor of psychopaths and at the expense of the victims who are led to believe the lies told by psychopaths. I have to point out that the power of deception in Modern Times is like that Elephant in the room, and like the naked Emperor in the same room. These psychopaths have grown so powerful as to remain in power despite their routine lies, that everyone knows are lies, except for who knows what type of people afflicted with additional mental deficiencies added to psychopathy, during elections to gain power. "I will not raise taxes." "I will not go to war." "I will get us out of war." That is just 3 on a long list. "I will not vote to remove the president." Seriously, people are counting on these people to honor their published promises?
" I do solemnly swear to uphold and defend, the Constitution of the united States of America, ...
Josf-Kelley comments on Jan 23, 2020:
"At one time, Treason was met quickly with a trial and execution, like snakes in the hen house, the treasonous now hold our trusted positions of power and service, while most argue over which clown should win the Punch and Judy show, while sipping they're Kool-Aid." It was a published observation that the above was not true enough. The 6th President of the United States of America offered the following: "It is not merely the number of impeachments, that are to be expected to make public officers honest and attentive in their business. A general opinion must pervade the community, that the house, the body to impeach them for misconduct, is disinterested, and ever watchful for the public good; and that the judges who shall try impeachments, will not feel a shadow of biass. Under such circumstances, men will not dare transgress, who, not deterred by such accusers and judges, would repeatedly misbehave. We have already suffered many and extensive evils, owing to the defects of the confederation, in not providing against the misconduct of public officers. When we expect the law to be punctually executed, not one man in ten thousand will disobey it: it is the probable chance of escaping punishment that induces men to transgress. It is one important mean to make the government just and honest, rigidly and constantly to hold, before the eyes of those who execute it, punishment, and dismission from office, for misconduct. These are principles no candid man, who has just ideas of the essential features of a free government, will controvert. They are, to be sure, at this period, called visionary, speculative and anti-governmental—but in the true stile of courtiers, selfish politicians, and flatterers of despotism—discerning republican men of both parties see their value. They are said to be of no value, by empty boasting advocates for the constitution, who, by their weakness and conduct, in fact, injure its cause much more than most of its opponents. From their high sounding promises, men are led to expect a defence of it, and to have their doubts removed. When a number of long pieces appear, they, instead of the defence, &c. they expected, see nothing but a parade of names—volumes written without ever coming to the point—cases quoted between which and ours there is not the least similitude—and partial extracts made from histories and governments, merely to serve a purpose. Some of them, like the true admirers of royal and senatorial robes, would fain prove, that nations who have thought like freemen and philosophers about government, and endeavoured to be free, have often been the most miserable: if a single riot, in the course of five hundred years happened in a free country, if a salary, or the interest of a public or private debt was not ...
No one talks about this anymore. [youtu.be]
Josf-Kelley comments on Jan 21, 2020:
Q. Let me ask you finally -- this has been a long road -- how you regard -- what is your explanation for the fact that there has been such little national media coverage of these -- of this trial and this evidence and this event here in this Memphis courtroom, which is the first trial ever to be able to produce evidence on this assassination -- what has happened here that Mighty Wurlitzer is not sounding but is in fact totally silent -- almost totally silent? A. Oh, but -- as we know, silence can be deafening. Disinformation is not only getting certain things to appear in print, it's also getting certain things not to appear in print. I mean, the first -- the first thing I would say as a way of explanation is the incredibly powerful effect of disinformation over a long period of time that I mentioned before. For 30 years the official line has been that James Earl Ray killed Martin Luther King and he did it all by himself. That's 30 years, not -- nothing like the short period when the line was that the Cubans raped the Angolan women. But for 30 years it's James Earl Ray killed Dr. King, did it all by himself. And when that is imprinted in the minds of the general public for 30 years, if somebody stood up and confessed and said: I did it. Ray didn't do it, I did it. Here's a movie. Here's a video showing me do it. 99 percent of the people wouldn't believe him because it just -- it just wouldn't click in the mind. It would just go right to -- it couldn't be. It's just a powerful psychological effect over 30 years of disinformation that's been imprinted on the brains of the -- the public. Something to the country couldn't -- couldn't be. https://thekingcenter.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/12/King_Family_Trial_Transcript.pdf
  • Level8 (85,725pts)
  • Posts777
  • Comments
      Replies
    1,895
    1,213
  • Followers 17
  • Fans 0
  • Following 1
  • Referrals11
  • Joined Oct 29th, 2019
  • Last Visit 3+ months ago
Josf-Kelley's Groups
Q is for question
460 members, Host
Voluntary Mutual Defence
37 members, Host
End Game (formerly Ryan Faulk Fans)
14 members, Host
Controversial Charts
48193 members
Jordan Peterson Group
25436 members
Ben Shapiro Group
22984 members
Joe Rogan Group
16342 members
Just Jokes and Memes
14494 members
Tucker Carlson Fans
13547 members
Dinesh D'Souza Fans
10234 members
IDW Topic-of-the-Day
9848 members
News From All Views
7277 members
DaisyCousens
5902 members
Tim Pool Group
5879 members
Sydney Watson Fanspace
5513 members
Classical Liberalism
4844 members
Canadian Politics
4019 members
Arielle Scarcella FanSpace!
2803 members
IDW Political Party
2798 members
Politically Incorrect folks
2480 members
Anti-Socialism
2269 members
Learning from Christ
2237 members
President Donald J. Trump... Latest
2066 members
Saving Western Civilisation
2056 members
RamZPaul
1889 members
John Paul Watson Group
1610 members
Liberalism Is A Mental Disorder
1567 members
Alex Jones Fans
1299 members
Conspiracy Truth : Wolves And Sheeple
1226 members
Stefan Molyneux Fans
1049 members
Anti Communists
1022 members
Emergency Preparedness and Survival
949 members
Libertarian Freethinkers
896 members
COVID-19
765 members
The Great Reset
708 members
The Second Amendment Sanctuary
649 members
True Crime Discussion Group
597 members
Conspiracy Research
575 members
Words of Wisdom
480 members
Feminism = cancer
474 members
International News
396 members
Comedy, Laughs and Humor.
327 members
Vaccine Education & Discussion Group
307 members
Ideas of God
291 members
The Case Against Corona Panic
250 members
Dr. Steve Turley Group
185 members
Joe Biden Is Not My President
178 members
United We Stand
153 members
The History Corner
150 members
Brain soup
128 members
IDW.Community Senate
124 members
ORIGINAL MEMES ( GREGORY ALAN ELLIOTT )
118 members
Liz Wheeler Fans Page.
116 members
Red Pilled Hotties (Yes you can still flirt & remain politically engaged)
107 members
Propaganda Clearing House
95 members
MGTOW: Exodus From The Plantation
63 members
Anarcho-Capitalism / Voluntaryism
55 members
IDW Liberty Alliance Culture War Room
49 members
Now You Are Talking With
48 members
Rednecks Anonymous
43 members
Current Events
28 members
50 Policies
23 members
Anthony Brian Logan Fans
21 members
Freemerica
19 members
Children's Health Defense
16 members
UnCommon Sense 42020 PodCast
9 members