slug.com slug.com

1 2

Q & A
Subject: 'light'

We say we can’t travel at the speed of light, yet the speed of light has already been created by physics, why can’t we solve this?
The Constant is the Uncreated. It's the relative that is the created.

If the entire solar system is illuminated by the sun, why is it dark in outer space?
You can only find light on surfaces.

What would happen if an unstoppable force slowed down?
If it’s slowing down, it’s being accelerated which means it isn’t unstoppable.

Do you believe that nothing is faster than light?
I don’t have to rely on belief. When you realize that light can’t travel distances between locations (there’s no time available for travel), you realize that it must be instantaneous (infinite velocity).

If I had a device that vibrated me at 99% the speed of light, and theoretically didn't harm me, could I perceive events slower and have super speed?
Light doesn’t vibrate.
Light can only be found on surfaces.
Time stops at the speed of light and according to the Theory of General Relativity, space is directly proportional to time which means spacial distance is no more. How does light have a speed if it has no distance to travel?

Can you examine light photons while in a particle accelerator while they are cooled in liquid nitrogen?
Isolating photons from a light source is absurd. How are they supposed to rest anywhere with no rest mass?

Do you believe that nothing is faster than light?
I don’t have to rely on belief. When you realize that light can’t travel distances between locations (there’s no time available for travel), you realize that it must be instantaneous (infinite velocity).

The laws of physics says that two objects cannot occupy the same space at the same time. Yet, electromagnetic waves can. How does physics apply to electromagnetic waves?
The electromagnetic wave is a non-dimensional phenomenon which means it has no spacial extent. This is the reason it has an infinite velocity (instantaneous arrival from departure). There is no actual distance to travel that would condition a measurement of travel time.

How true is this statement that one of the physical significance of E = MC^2 (from Einstein) is that the speed of light can also be a source of energy?

Look at it this way.
IF
There is only mass and energy
AND
Light has no mass
THEN
Light must be 0% energy

If you were holding a very long stick with a ball at the other end and you pushed the stick, would the ball at the other end move at the moment you pushed the stick? Wouldn't that mean that the stick was moving faster than the speed of light?
You always get caught up in paradoxes if you don't have the right understanding. At the speed of light, time stops. If you have no time to travel, you have no time to travel a year or many years.

Zteph 7 Aug 9
Share

Be part of the movement!

Welcome to the community for those who value free speech, evidence and civil discourse.

Create your free account

1 comment

Feel free to reply to any comment by clicking the "Reply" button.

0

Interesting! Thanks

You're welcome!
THE 'PHYSICIST' CHARACTER
"All the world's a stage...."
[ello.co]

You can include a link to this post in your posts and comments by including the text q:120483
Slug does not evaluate or guarantee the accuracy of any content. Read full disclaimer.