slug.com slug.com

8 6

Ginsburg was a fine judge. Smart, empathic. That's all you can reasonably ask for in a judge. As an add-on she had a really, really dry sense of humor and told stories that were funny and have to be savored. Reminds me of Feynman, a bit. Might be that Jewish comedian or story-telling gene (which I think exists-- prove me wrong). And she did a lot to even-up the legal playing field for women, which I'm always for.

I'm just as happy about Trump's new nomination, Amy Barrett. Top notch legal mind and an amazing person. I just heard her tell about her first adopted child, who she got word was ready to come (at age 3) after the Haitian earthquake. She already had four kids and had just learned she was unexpectantly pregnant. She could have turned the Haitian child down-- easily. In this day and age when people narcissistically chose their PETS in colors to match the furniture, this woman (and her husband, who must also be a saint) decided she would NOT have a designer life, but would take them both. That is an act so selfless and humanistic that it beats the crap out of anything I will ever do, and it commands respect. On that basis alone (along with her necessary background) I'd back her as a judge. I don't CARE what her politics are. Literally, when you find a person of this quality, it overrides more or less anything.😳

I was not surprised that the NY Times does not feel the same. They are controlled by a certain species of progressive Ashkenazi secular Jew who believes that they are in possession of the The Political new-Marxist Truth, and the rest of the country should follow (reaction to this bicoastal smuggery GAVE us Trump). This is not all Jews (Orthodox Jews and many observant Jews are antiabortion). But it is the NY times Jews. The ones for which we call it the Jew York Times. It's not a Jewish problem, but a certain social justice warrior pro-abortion liberal NY Jewish problem (please don't mistake my remarks for what they are not). These secular Left sub-tribalists don't like Christians, or believers, and they certainly don't like Roman Catholics in the least. They don't want to replace Ginsburg with Barrett. 😟

These are also the people who brought you critical race theory. With the idea that white people are racist when they adopt black children. Even starving ones. Yes, they are miserable excuses for human beings. The Democrats overlook them, because they are on the "same side." To which I say God help us. And I'm an atheist.😇

Babou 7 Sep 29
Share

Be part of the movement!

Welcome to the community for those who value free speech, evidence and civil discourse.

Create your free account

8 comments

Feel free to reply to any comment by clicking the "Reply" button.

0

She was an absolute nutcase.

0

Did you ever read one of her books she was a nut

0

Ginsburg was a stone cold killer!

1

Fortunately Barrett is unlikely to legislate from the bench like RBG

0

Yes, they say Stalin had the same personality traits.

5

RBG drove some rather deep legislative ruts through American culture that have helped to speed the country to its current divided state, threatening to cripple America.

0

I kind of agree other than she was a total nut

4

I hope Amy Barrett is speedily confirmed and I think she will make a much better judge than Ginsburg.

Write Comment
You can include a link to this post in your posts and comments by including the text q:136177
Slug does not evaluate or guarantee the accuracy of any content. Read full disclaimer.