slug.com slug.com

1 1

Sigh... Been quite a while since I've been online. Just been so darn busy and recently began doing an re-examination of the Mueller report, Comey's investigation, The Steele Dossier and watching documentaries. As I believe I've said before, I'm a skeptic which helps me to be able in some situations to be neutrail on some discussions. I highly recommended that people watch some of the documentaries on Amazon Prime that deal with these things.
Especially watch, "TRUMP: SHOWDOWN" and TRUMP: THE COMPANY HE KEEPS

I realize that I did not give myself enough time to read thoroughly the documents of 'accusation'. After watching the above, I knew I needed to read and highlight, as well as, take notes from these articles and documentaries. In 2019, I began to believe that he chose Pence for the VP to draw in the Conservative Republican votes. He got them too.

Then as I went through the shows, I'm almost completely convinced of it. As long as Trump can bully someone into doing what HE wants and they do it, people are okay. Nonetheless, when you do the opposite, you may find yourself, FIRED by Trump.

Did they ever reveal who this 'whistle blower' was? I don't know that it matters now because the more one delves into the tiny details, the more we are able to see corruption.

I'm still skeptical.
But perhaps, not for much longer.

We_The_People 4 Oct 4
Share

Be part of the movement!

Welcome to the community for those who value free speech, evidence and civil discourse.

Create your free account

1 comment

Feel free to reply to any comment by clicking the "Reply" button.

2

The whistleblower was Eric Ciaramella, though they never officially released the name. We know this because there was an inordinate of secrecy in protecting his identity. When suspicions arose around him social media began censoring videos, comments, and posts mentioning him. The news media attacked people for trying to find out who he was or mention his name. When Jim Jordan said his name in a committee meeting Adam Schiff rebuked him and told him not to ask questions abut the whistleblower. This was quite telling because Schiff claimed that he didn't know the whistleblower's name. Rand Paul, however, tricked John Roberts into confirming the identity. During the Senate trial of Trump Rand submitted a question about Ciaramella, unconnected to whomever the whistleblower might be, and Roberts refused to ask the question.

Oh that's right. Ty I had forgotten that. I need to add his name to the list of people I want to do background info on.

I had read an article that EC was connected to Schiffs's family somehow. A in law?

Schiff wanted to criminalize using the name. I always assumed Schiff released it accidently then did the monkey flips to cover it.

@We_The_People Schiff has a son-in-law named Eric but it's a different person. BTW, Ciaramella is mentioned in the recently released Senate report on Hunter Biden.

You can include a link to this post in your posts and comments by including the text q:137723
Slug does not evaluate or guarantee the accuracy of any content. Read full disclaimer.