slug.com slug.com

2 2

LIBERALS IN WAR MODE AFTER THE CAPITOL STORMING

The Capitol storming has revealed how fragile democracy is and how thin the varnish of civilization is. Media, politicians, pundits, debaters, and the Good™ people are now calling for the anonymous and unelected at Big Tech, banks, companies, and airlines to deplatform, debank, fire, and ground anyone who can be suspected to be a Trump supporter or an alleged racist-fascist-Nazi-Islamophobic domestic terrorist.
The banning of President Trump is a top brass decision. But do you think that the CEOs or libertarians in suit and tie handle the banning of peasants, or could it be delegated to young SJWs with green and purple hair who hate men, racists, and fascists? It's terrifying to see how easily bourgeois politicians sacrifice the freedom of speech in today's public square and allow lifelong discrimination on political grounds for alleged wrongthink without redemption. The desire to DESTROY the political opposition is an overt manifestation of 'the will to power' (Nietzsche) harm and mayhem. Hate-driven 'woke' authoritarianism without accountability.
.
. IS THIS DOUBLE STANDARD OR WAR MODE ETHICS
The four-year-long demonization of Donal J. Trump has made many people hate him. When people dislike someone, they often use double standards when judging, and they go into war mode ethics when they tribally hate.
When people are in war mode ethics, they disregard all principles to satisfy their 'will to power' (Nietzsche) harm and mayhem. In war mode, you desire to destroy the enemy, foreign or domestic, serial killing of the enemy makes you a hero; in peace mode ethics, you will be despised, jailed for life, or executed for the same actions.
The Good™ people cheer on Twitter's censoring of the USA's President and many others on the right while completely ignoring that Twitter allows all the authoritarian leaders and dictators in the world and many terrorists to post whatever they want. Media, liberal politicians, and the Good™ people call six months of Antifa and BLM rioting and looting peaceful protests despite the many lives lost and the enormous property damage they have caused not only in the US.

THE US MILITARY MIGHT AND THE CAPITOL HILL STORMING
The unlawful storming of the Capitol by a few hundred (?) Trump supporters played straight in the hands of the authoritarian Left, which now is doing its best to demonize the opposition as the Evil enemy. The Good™ people generalize and individualize perpetrators as it fits them best; all Trump supporters globally are somehow guilty of the storming while Islam still is a religion of peace after 38,000+ deadly attacks since 9/11.

This protest that got out of hand is described as an insurrection, domestic terrorism, et cetera. President Trump is accused of sedition and incitement to violence; however, the media doesn't show any video clips and transcriptions where he does it. The accusations are a hoax that all Trump haters swallowed without a single question. No critical thinking at all; they swallowed it hook, line, and sinker. Have you, dear reader, seen any clips or transcriptions? Do you believe that the media are hiding them to protect Trump?
. Quote
"Twitter nuked Donald Trump for two specific tweets they said they found offensive one was when the president said he wasn't going to go to the inauguration. They said that incited violence and the other is when he said his voters had a giant voice. They said that glorified violence.

You know that's BS, and everybody knows it's BS, so I just want to establish that the American people do not need an unelected CEO to protect us from words uttered by a president who we elected ourselves. We don't need it right now; this is an offensive against the president that started a very long time, and we saw it happen in slow motion.
Remember they first started to blackout his press conferences, then they started to blackout his rallies, then they blacked out his accomplishments and blacked out any news that would have helped him win reelection, aka hunter Biden's laptop all right, and now they have monopolies Amazon Facebook Twitter all of these companies the strongest most powerful wealthiest corporations in the entire world and they have now conspired with the media and the Democrats to re-engineer the infrastructure of the internet to crack down on their political opponents and their market competitors." End quote
Jesse Watters on Fox at 04:39
youtu (dot) be/HDRuSoapjmA
.
. COMBATTATANTS AT CAPITOL HILL
. The United States Of America
The US Armed Forces are the strongest globally and have global reach and presence; Army, Marine Corps, Navy, Air Force, Space Force, and Coast Guard. Plus the National Guard and the Air National Guard.
The mighty US Navy sails all the seven seas; the Air Force has an enormous reach and capability; the land-based troops have bases in numerous countries. To this comes cruise missiles, ICBMs conventional and nuclear, ad infinitum. Plus Special Operation Forces like the Navy Seals and Green Berets. Moreover, the US has 17 (seventeen) intelligence agencies, such as the CIA, NSA, DIA, FBI, and the DHS.

The Alleged Insurrectionists
Many protestors were fighting with the police and vandalizing, scenes we have seen caused by the Left ad nauseam. The Trump protestors, a few hundred inside the Capitol (?), allegedly had a gun, a pipebomb, and, say, a dozen straps, which were never used on the hundreds of staff and politicians.
The alleged 'leader' of the storming a horn-helmeted 'shaman' is a failed actor and singer living with his mum. Most 'intruders' were unmasked, strolling around filming with their mobiles, also grandma, who was carrying a small flag together with her mobile. Many of them were live-streaming each other. Wonder how she handled the police lines to get in, high karate kicks?
The unmasked selfie-taking strollers were either full-blown idiots or let in by the police, thus feeling that they have lawfully entered the Capitol. I think there was both; grandma must have been let in.
. Could Nuking Washington Defeat The US?
Is there anyone who truly believes that the Capitol storming was a planned failed coup d 'état—storming the 'palace' without significant military support on standby? An insurrection 'secretly' planned on an open social media platform allegedly Parler without encryption and via text messages. Why didn't they use Telegram, Signal, CoutHub, ProtonMail, and the dark web?

Do you think that 300,000 military age militiamen armed to the teeth (including Man-portable air-defense (MANPADS)) using cutting-edge encrypted communications techniques holding the Capitol hostage would defeat the US Armed Forces, thus carrying out a successful coup? Do you think that the US would be defeated and surrender if 'Ivan' nuked the entire Washington DC, including the Capitol and the White House, to radioactive ashes? No, of course not! The US would launch a devastating counterstrike wiping 'Ivan' off of the face of the Earth.

Nevertheless, media, politicians, pundits, debaters, and the Good™ people are doing their utmost to blow this stupid incident out of proportion to justify their will to silence the Trump voters with draconian measures. The unlawful storming of the Capitol played straight into the hands of the authoritarian Left, and it unmasked 'the will to power' (Nietzsche) harm and mayhem within the Good™ people yet again.

The willingness to demonize the Capitol incident and generalize blame and responsibility for it to 70+ million Trump voters is a sign of tribal hatred that is something else than a double standard.
There is a danger that the Democrats will use the Capitol incident in the same way as newly-elected Chancellor Hitler did after the Reichstag fire in 1933 when he banned the Communist Party.
.
. FASCISM
Ronald Reagan: "If Fascism Ever Comes to America, It Will Come in the Name of Liberalism"

In his book 'FASCISM: The Carrer of a Concept,' Paul Gottfried shows how the definition of fascism and the authoritarian personality type expanded over time far beyond what the Nazis stood for and the atrocities they committed. Many on the Left today regard all political opponents as fascists and Nazis; and the Holocaust as the original sin of all white people, including the descendants of those who stormed the beaches of Normandy. Thereby gradually transforming internationalism and race egalitarianism to anti-whiteness in the name of egalitarian anti-racism. The Left doesn't search for the truth; they have a quest for power and mayhem.

After the war, European socialists claimed that the national socialists were rightwing, and hence they accused the bourgeoise parties of being fascist and Nazi. A straightforward way to demonize your opponents while thereby sanctifying yourself as anti-fascist and anti-Nazi. This demonization was an effective and effortless contrastive group building. Media, politicians, and the Good™ people label political opponents as the tribal enemy by using the worst derogatory, degrading, and dehumanizing slurs they know.
. HATE, VIOLENCE, AND MORALS
To understand the hatred of Antifa, BLM, SJWs, many of the Good™ people, and media, we must take into account how people treat tribal enemies. Antifa and BLM have shown an appallingly aggressive, intimidating, degrading, and often violent treatment of, to them, unknown regular Americans that comes in their way. They have assaulted elderly and disabled people, motorists, business owners, Trump supporters, and the police.
Suddenly having a crazed mob, presupposing you are their tribal enemy, surrounding you in your car, or the street, or at a restaurant shouting you in the face even with bullhorns can be very unpleasant and intimidating; it's neither inclusive nor an act of microaggression. In my opinion, we cannot explain this extreme hostility toward random members of perceived outgroups, like pulling a stranger out of a car and kicking him to death, using the Moral Foundations Theory.

War is perhaps the best example of dual ethics when it suddenly becomes morally okay, mandatory, and even heroic to kill the enemy. Thou shalt never kill - except in war when thou shalt kill for all you got! Some soldiers get PTSD, but most are okay with killing the enemy on the battlefield. Moreover, it's much easier to kill remotely from behind a screen or desk.
If you kill 'Ivan' in peacetime, you might be executed, but if you REFUSE to kill 'Ivan' in wartime, you also might be executed! (Life in prison) How many westerners object to this type of dual ethics?

HUMANS HAVE ALWAYS FELT AS ONE WITH THEIR MORALS
The history of humankind from the very beginning until recently is inhumane seen with the morals of today: cruel initiation rites, slavery, serfdom, cannibalism, human sacrifice, infanticide, senicide, democide, genocide, endless wars with neighboring tribes, and rulers with 'divine' absolute power, et cetera. The vast majority of the people back then ought to have felt one with their then-contemporary morals, no matter how immoral their customs seem to us.
This phenomenon is fundamental for understanding humans; however, it's only superficially understood by most people.

These phenomena show the human capacity for different and multiple ethics. Despite this, we are being told in school that all cultures more or less have the same universal morals, thus implying that all cultures value ingroup, outgroup, and allies roughly the same; this is patently false! Since cultures and religions with multiple ethics have an intended difference in morals between how to treat those belonging to ingroup, outgroup, and groups of allies, respectively.

UNIVERSAL ETHICS
It's sound that groups like Peoples, ethnicities, and religions have positive ingroup bias and negative outgroup bias in moderation.
Most westerners sincerely believe that they have a universal moral and are free from bias, hence treating all groups and Peoples the same. They also firmly believe that the other also has this universal moral.

The Western politically correct culture and society see itself as having universal ethics while WHITE ingroups are tabooed and seen as xenophobic, racist, fascist, and Nazi. Simultaneously, minorities are free and supported to organize and work hard for their positive ingroup interests and openly express their disdain and hatred for Whites. This type of politically correct WHITE outgroup favoritism is unique, destructive, and suicidal for the European kind, and it disguises the oppression of whites with ingroup preference.

However, the Left and politically correct or short the Good™ people have no idea that they have this unique WHITE outgroup favoritism; they confuse it with inclusiveness. Moreover, they do NOT understand that they have negative ingroup bias since they are as one with their anti-whiteness. The Good™ people see whites with natural ingroup preference as Evil, racists, fascists, Nazis, and White supremacists. That's not an opinion they have reached by reasoning; instead, it's a profoundly and early internalized moral standpoint.
. SHAMING AND GUILTING OF WHITE IDENTITY
White children are, from the start, denied being proud of their biological identity and heritage. White identity or whiteness is seen as a severe problem in the politically correct multicultural society. All children except white kids are, by contrast, taught to identify with their biological identity positively! While white identity is demonized as racist, Nazi, and white supremacist and tabooed as a positive identity. Furthermore, multicultural society is supposed to be a harmonious mixture of cultures, while the Good™ white people deny any white cultures' very existence!

Why does 14-year-old Lisa have such an accurate politically correct worldview that the West's Left-wing parties want to lower the voting age to 16? Why is white heterosexual Lisa, a supporter of BLM and the gay pride movement?

Imagine both the teacher's and the other children's reactions if a young white child, 9-year-old John, would stand up in front of the class and say that I am white and proud. However, no young white child would even think of publicly saying that I'm white and proud since they have already internalized how tabooed, shameful, racist, and Evil such a heretic act would be — John 9 would much rather show his tiny penis publicly!
In Sweden, a child expressing pride over its white heritage might get reported to the child protective services due to concerns about the parents' suitability. However, if a Black, Chinese, Japanese, Jewish, Muslim, et cetera child would do the same, they would receive the white teacher's liking.

At what age does average white John understand that it's tabooed to be proud of his white heritage? It's early, probably long before he is nine. And why does white Lisa express support for racial and sexual strangers but not for her kind?

But does John logically understand why he shouldn't say he's proud? No. Has anyone told little John time and time again that: you cannot eat candy before meals, you must wash your hands before eating, brush your teeth before going to bed, and for heaven's sake, you should be ashamed of being proud of being white! He has probably heard the candy, hands, and teeth reminders a million times, but never anything about not displaying his penis or white pride publicly. Yet, remarkable, it's the latter and the untold that he obeys seemingly automatically. Or is it so that what appears remarkable is quite natural given how children learn. But it's not only John and Lisa that learn their position in the social hierarchy early.

Quote
'At one point, I [Alice Teodorescu Måwe] reprimanded an aggressive 8-year-old who responded by pushing me aside and demonstratively explaining that I, as a woman, did not have the right to reprimand him. Shocked, I left the situation and turned to one of the regular teachers for advice.
The person in question took me aside and explained that the student came from a different culture and that such views on women were probably entertained at his home, which we had to accept. If we had "accepted" the same views if the boy had a Swedish-sounding name, I, unfortunately, did not come to ask myself.' End quote
GP Ledare Oct 28, 2020

Moreover, how come Lisa always finds the right politically correct answers to new political questions? Is she a political genius? No, there is at least one 14-year-old Lisa in every class worldwide.

14-year-old Lisa, 9-year-old John, and 8-year-old Ali seem to have found their roles in the multicultural hierarchy intuitively. Lisa is advocating for the interests of non-whites and non-heterosexuals, while John is already too alienated and ashamed of his white identity even to dare to think of defending it—the social danger is evident to him. If he said that he is 'white and proud,' the teacher would stop him and say that only racists and white supremacists speak like that and that it's hurtful for minority students. Moreover, what would the older and more physically mature non-whites do when the rumor reached them that little Jonny is a despicable racist who hates blacks? Whites with natural ingroup preferences are regarded as xenophobic, racist haters. Ali, on the other hand, is secure in his patriarchal role as ruler over women.

Therefore, it isn't surprising that most white students are so good at political correctness before going to university despite taking any formal PC classes. Similarly, black students are aware of their victimhood status from the start and that being a victim can serve as an excuse for bad behavior and grades. They will also intuitively learn that media, politicians, activists, teachers and white (female) students readily make excuses for the blacks' bad behavior. But hardly ever the other way around.

Humankind has an enormous capacity for dual or multiple ethics if socialized into it at an early age. The tricky thing is to socialize kids to a universal ethic since it's anti-Darwinian since not favoring your kind makes your group lose in competition with those who do. Let's look at some examples:

SLAVERY
Slavery is an excellent example of tribal dual ethics when one tribe or race uses another as slaves and are perfectly fine with it as in the US before 1865. The Declaration of Independence from 1776 states that "all men are created equal," which today is used as a Universal Declaration of Racial Equality, which it's not. My understanding is that it was directed at King George III, telling him that the Founding Fathers saw themselves as free equals to him and that it had nothing to do with black slaves.

SERFDOM
Roughly the same as slavery but often within a People.

HUMAN SACRIFICE
'While human sacrifice was practiced throughout Mesoamerica, the Aztecs, according to their own accounts, brought this practice to an unprecedented level. For example, for the reconsecration of the Great Pyramid of Tenochtitlan in 1487, the Aztecs reported that they sacrificed 80,400 prisoners over the course of four days, reportedly by Ahuitzotl, the Great Speaker himself. This number, however, is not universally accepted and may have been exaggerated.[93]'
Wikipedia

HONOR CULTURES
The feminists, the Left, and many politically correct are almost indifferent to real victims of forced marriages, FGM, honor oppression, and murders. Their indifference is due to the fact that the perpetrators are not the Evil White CIS man. The Left party in Sweden has ostracized and expelled minority women who have highlighted the problems associated with honor cultures.

ISLAM AND SHARIA
It is noteworthy that feminists who claim they are favorable to Islam do not have any problems with the Muslim woman's half value. Also, gays for Islam have no problem with sodomy punished with the death penalty in Islam. Moreover, that the politically correct in Sweden who are repeating the doctrine of 'equal value ​​of all people' ad nauseam also has no problem with that in Sharia law, the Muslim man is the first-class and the Muslim woman second-class citizen with the man's half-value. The politically correct, even Christians, also have no problem with Christians, and Jews are on graces being able to live as third-class citizens if they pay jizya and that ALL others are considered kafir regardless of religion or lack of faith (atheists). That is, as unbelievers who would have to choose between converting to Islam or die.

The Left, LGBTQ people, feminists, and politically correct know that most of them have an immoral sex & drugs & rock & roll lifestyle seen from both an honor culture and a Muslim perspective.
Denialism and distancing are essential parts of false tolerance/indifference and lobbying for Islam. A distancing with the conviction that Islam's disadvantages cannot affect oneself and that Muslim men and men of 'honor' are needed as allies in the greater struggle against the real enemy — the White man and the West.

Many Muslims in the West self-segregate and form communities where non-Muslims are not welcome and where 'youth' attack First responders (blåljuspersonal), mail carriers, and construction workers, thereby showing their hostility toward society. This phenomenon is present throughout the West.

WISHING FOR AND CELEBRATING THE DEATH OF OTHERS
That's considered very uncivilized and something you better keep to yourself if you don't want to give a horrible impression. Nevertheless, there are quite a few celebrities who publicly have wished for President Trump's harm and death. However, it seems to come naturally to most people to celebrate the death of dictators and tyrants.

WAR
War is perhaps the best example of dual ethics when it suddenly becomes morally okay and even becomes mandatory to kill the enemy, while it's still totally wrong to kill anyone else. Some soldiers get PTSD, but most are okay with killing the enemy on the battlefield. Moreover, it's much easier to kill remotely from behind a screen, desk, or headquarter.

If you kill 'Ivan' in peacetime, you might be executed, but if you REFUSE to kill 'Ivan' in wartime, you also might be executed! (Life in prison) How many westerners object to this type of dual ethics? Is anybody calling it hypocrisy or a double standard? No!
Moreover, WWII fighter pilots proudly presented their kills with tally marks on their planes! And they were seen as heroes. Hero serial killers! The longer the series, the greater the hero! When you kill in wartime, you celebrate.
Another form of tally marks are trophies like shrunken heads worn by head-hunters and scalps by American Indians.
. DUAL OR MULTIPLE ETHICS, VS. DOUBLE STANDARD
A definition of a double standard
"A set of principles that applies differently and usually more rigorously to one group of people or circumstances than to another
especially: a code of morals that applies more severe standards of sexual behavior to women than to men"
Merriam-Webster

"Synonyms and Antonyms of hypocrisy
the pretending of having virtues, principles, or beliefs that one in fact does not have
the hypocrisy of people who claim to care about the environment but ride around in gas-guzzlers
Synonyms of hypocrisy
cant, dissembling, dissimulation, insincerity, piousness"
Merriam-Webster

Double standards are often seen as hypocrisy, which then implicates that a universal norm or moral is the natural default position. Most people can understand that claiming that one cares about the environment but rides a gas-guzzler is hypocritical. And when a grassroots environmentalist claims that the party elite has the right to fly private jets is a double standard.

Dual or multiple ethics is when an ingroup intentionally treat outgroups unequally WITHOUT BEING ABLE to see it as unjust or morally wrong.

For example:
• Thou shalt not bear false witness against thy neighbor
Versus
• Thou shalt always bear false witness against thy political enemies

Example II
• Thou shalt never lie to, steal from, or kill one of our own
Versus
• Thou shalt never tell the truth to our enemies of war
• Thou shalt always steal as much as you can from our enemies of war
• Thou shalt always kill our enemies of war when ordered

Example III
Never shoot fleeing suspected criminals in the back in peacetime (Sweden) versus on the battlefield where the order is RETREATER(S) FIRE! Because retreating enemy soldiers are not fleeing home to mama, they are instead going to regroup and continue fighting.

The Good™ people are convinced that they have a universal good moral compared to the Evil bigot fascist right. However, feminists without 'skin in the game' don't realize that they are practicing dual or multiple ethics by, for instance, ignoring the FGM victims of honor cultures and the Muslim woman's lesser value under Islam. Many feminists deny the very existence of honor culture and accuse those who insist on it being racists, xenophobes, and Islamophobes, and insists that the hijab is a voluntary 'freedom' veil.

The politically correct are utterly indifferent or deny that Islam has multiple ethics for Muslims, Jews, Christians, and other non-Muslims. So much for the dogma 'the equal value of all people.' The Good™ people use this doctrine in Sweden against the opponents to mass immigration as an indirect accusation of xenophobia and racism. The message is Whitey; if you do NOT want to make yourself an ethnic minority in your ancestral homeland with a smile, you're a white nationalist and supremacist!

The principal cause of why the Western world has left the ethos of truth, reason, and logic is since taboos forbid the fundamental facts necessary for reaching a correct worldview. Plus, all school children are alienated from and made tribally hostile to the White man and Western civilization. Moreover, the truth-tellers are demonized and punished by media, self-appointed commissars, and many of the politically correct. Since the truth is tabooed, it makes the politically correct lose debates, reducing their argumentive range to accusations of xenophobia, misogyny, racism, Islamophobia, fascism, Nazism, and white supremacism. Not to forget ad hominem attacks, brown smearing (brown as Nazi color), demonization, deplatforming, and doxing to ruin political opponents' lives.
.
. ANTIFA, BLM, THE DEMOCRATS, AND THE GOOD™ CARING PEOPLE
Now it's more or less a reality that it is perfectly okay to 'Bash The Fasc.' This unprincipled view on the use of violence means that left-wing violence on alleged fascists is normalized since fascists are viewed as a tribal enemy.
Who is then a fascist or a witch? Those media and the Good™ Caring people are pointing fingers and screaming at — Trump supporters, patriots, right-wingers, et cetera!
The right must ask itself if the Good™ Caring people are in peace-mode or war-mode now against witches, sorry fascists, sorry against anyone who disagrees with them? More below.

Since 'war is the continuation of politics by other means' (Clausewitz), we can assume that this also applies to civil wars.
We have seen democides and genocides without civil wars in the USSR and Rwanda. Politics can go from peaceful and respectful discussions to full civil war via incrementally increased demonization in media until an avalanche effect begins. Then it's kill or be killed.
The SJWs, Antifa, and BLM who are using foul methods against their political enemies, demonizing them as racist and fascists, and way too many agree that it's always okay to literally 'Bash The Fasc.' For years, the police have been seen to stand back when a well prepared Antifa, with helmets, gas masks, and shields, is attacking demonstrations and manifestations.
The same Police tactic has, to a great extent, been used against the 'peaceful' BLM and Antifa rioters, combined with District Attorneys that have dropped all charges and released the arrestees. The catch and release policy has generous support from the Democrats and media, blaming the consequences of the 'peaceful' riots on rightwing extremists!

Antifa and BLM have shown an appallingly aggressive, intimidating, degrading, and often violent treatment of, to them, unknown regular Americans that comes in their way. They have assaulted passers bye, the elderly and disabled people in wheelchairs, motorists, or no reason, business owners, Trump supporters, and the police. Having a crazed mob, presupposing you are their tribal enemy, surrounding you in your car, or the street, or at a restaurant shouting you in the face even with a bullhorn can be very intimidating, and it's neither inclusive nor non-microaggressive. Raise your fist in compliance — or else!

Antifa and BLM have been rioting in Portland for months during 2020 with media and the Democratic party's support. The police have arrested many, but the DAs have dropped all charges. Catch and release. The catch and release policy has further emboldened the 'protestors,' leading to an escalation of violence.

Looking at the mugshots of the Antifa arrestees and their previous encounters with the law, one could assume that they have mental problems. They hate capitalism, not out of poverty, since many of them come from affluent homes; it could be a strong desire to demote and harm those who are more successful than them.

There will always be people like Antifa, but it's telling that they have such broad support from the media and the grassroots. The media justifies the rioting, looting, tearing down statues, and burning by calling it mostly peaceful protests, thereby whitewashing them.
.
. THE ETERNAL COMPETITION
The foundation of my hypothesis to the causes of political correctness; the nature of the Politically Correct Belief System (PCBS) and the Programmable Arrested Development Syndrome (PADS), is based on Nietzsche's 'will to power' as the individual's most fundamental innate and unconscious driving force. Consequently, the will to pleasure, truth, and meaning are subordinate to the 'will to power.'

I claim that the innate 'will to power' (Nietzsche) manifests itself in eternal Darwinian competition for resources, partners, power, status, and prestige, which can be fair, open, and honest as in meritocratic competition. However, the field of non-meritocratic competition and power struggles is tempting and enormous. There are almost infinite non-meritocratic ways, overt and covert, to gain power, control, resources, status, and making life hard for others, et cetera.

Democracy and meritocracy are by no means natural and stable states in this eternal Darwinian struggle. We are now on our way to replace meritocratic with non-meritocratic competition in the name of equity. Using admission quotas based on your identity and how politically correct your researched social media worldview is. This systemic promotion of the lesser qualified is administered by HR-departments in business and industry and by the DIE bureaucracy in academia and the public sector.

The 2020 US Presidential election is an excellent example of collective non-meritocratic or Dark competition and the 'will to power.' Media, the Democrats, pundits, activists, and celebrities have spent four years demonizing President Donald J. Trump as racist, fascist, and Islamophobic, falsely and daily claiming 'Russia collusion' for three years, trying to impeach him, and trying their best to block everything he has promised to do. At the same time, Big Tech has censored and silenced tons of 'rightwing' voices on social media, put 'disputed' messages on the president's tweets without repercussions, and now banned President Trump and thousands of others.

Meanwhile, they all downplayed or buried Hillary Clinton's 33,000 emails, and 'acid' wiped harddrive, smashed secure phones, and the disaster in Benghazi. The same goes for Joe Biden's plagiarism, exaggerated educational attainments, and lately, cognitive decline. Moreover, the media has buried the damaging information about the 'big guy's' suspected corruption found on Hunter Biden's Laptop and his business companion's disclosures. At the same time, Twitter blocked the New York Post's account.
.
. SUMMARY
The Capitol storming has made it abundantly clear for many people on the right that the Good™ people don't see people who want to make America, or any western nation, great again as respectable political opponents. They are not just hypocritical or judge with a double standard — it's far more sinister!

Carl von Clausewitz — War is not an independent phenomenon, but the continuation of politics by different means.

9-year-old John and 14-year-old Lisa have already become alienated white children with outgroup preference, hostile to the White man and the West. The non-white children in the same schools are encouraged to be proud of their respective identities and group interests and become as anti-white and anti-Western as the white kids. The anti-white and anti-Western indoctrination is present from Kindergarten to academia. Hence, the more education you get, the more indoctrinated you become.

Very simplified: We can understand the Good™ WHITE people as biologically white but mentally non-white. It's like they have been imprinted on non-whites and identify with them and their interests instead of whites. It's much more complicated, but it's useful as a quick reminder when you speak with a competing and hostile 'ethnicity,' the white anti-white. The white antiwhites are indoctrinated or programmed to be hostile toward their genetic interests. Just imagine that they are HOSTILE non-white CHILDREN, and you'll easier understand how they think. (More about this process is to be released soon)

Consequently, the Good™ people of all colors hate Trump and his supporters as tribal enemies, and they went into full war mode in a snap. They have for decades called their opponents racist-fascist-Nazis. They are now doing their best to designate Trump activists, the worst labels they can come up with — domestic terrorists. Next stop, Gitmo!

During a war, it's both ethical and commendable to kill as many enemies as possible. It's with the same ethics honorably to use every dirty trick in the book to throw your enemies in jail for life in a political WAR.

I think it would be problematic to evaluate today's white people's behavior from an evolutionary standpoint since they are programmed to further the interests of 'the other' and counteract their biological interests.
Since this programmed maladaptive behavior severely affects most whites and is protected with taboos, it could be severely misleading to conclude anything about the frequency of mutations in the hardware.
Nevertheless, most Good™ white parents who favor multiculture on their ethnic expense flee it when their children risk ending up in a diverse school!

SECURITY CONCERNS
The increasing desperation of the Cool Kids, the Left, and the politically correct or short the Good™ people and the establishment due to the growing rejection of multiculturalism and the rising popularity of nationalism will make them more and more desperate and hence increasingly intolerant against dissenters. This desperation calls for vigilance! The pen is mightier than a nuke or two!

pwrmos 5 Jan 16
Share

Be part of the movement!

Welcome to the community for those who value free speech, evidence and civil discourse.

Create your free account

2 comments

Feel free to reply to any comment by clicking the "Reply" button.

0

and still not one protest at Google head quarters, Facebook corporate offices,or the Microsoft campus. the offices and corporate headquarters of the MSM have been ignored. the masses fight on against each other urged on by the media and no one seems to notice the real ones who are causing the destruction of this country. ask your self who told you to fight with your neighbor then turn on them they are the cause of your problems.

0

All fake war mode. The leftists are the ones who stormed the capitol. Another false flag.

You can include a link to this post in your posts and comments by including the text q:173510
Slug does not evaluate or guarantee the accuracy of any content. Read full disclaimer.