slug.com slug.com

3 2

And the world just keeps getting stranger.

[msn.com]

TyKC 7 Aug 30
Share

Be part of the movement!

Welcome to the community for those who value free speech, evidence and civil discourse.

Create your free account

3 comments

Feel free to reply to any comment by clicking the "Reply" button.

1

Democrats use certification (law, doctor, psychiatrist, teacher, etc) as tool of apartheid, of ethnic cleansing. The Bar has announced that it will exclude white people. The evil is that you need Bar clearance to practice law.

Psychiatrists control the drugs, and they use this power corruptly. The power that psychiatrists possess is given to them by the government.

All certification systems should be destroyed.

If I were governor I would fire every government-employed psychiatrist in the state.

The Bar has announced that it will exclude white people.

Source? If this is legit, this is massive news.

@Alysandir

Miner originally posted this on another thread.

[vdare.org]

in-the-name-of-social-justice-the-american-bar-association-proposes-violating-federal-law-to-discriminate-against-white-students

@jaymaron

Okay, what am I missing here?

I see the general asshattery of injecting woke progressivism into the curriculum(1), but I don't see anything that says they are planning to exclude white people from either law school or the Bar Association, except for the comment the presenter makes before showing the article.


(1) Even Ben Shapiro claims that he knows about Critical Theory because it was taught to him while he attended law school. So it's not like this is something brand new and unheard of.

Psychiatrists must be certified by the ABPN. The American Board of Psychiatry and Neurology (ABPN) is a not-for-profit corporation, not the government.

@TyKC

I declared war on the field of psychiatry. I consider the field of psychiatry to be in the dark ages. For humanity to advance, the field of psychiatry must be destroyed. Psychiatry is an obstacle to humanity.

There are many more people at war with psychiatry, such as the Alexander Technique community.
It's well-known in the community of the mind-body arts that psychiatry is primitive, and that things like
Alexander Technique, Feldenkrais Technique, Reiki, Wushu, Shaolin kung fu, Cranial sacral technique, etc. are superior. They're laughing at psychiatrists.

Textbook on Alexander technique. jaymaron.com/shaolin.html [jaymaron.com]

Psychiatrists do not study computational physics, and this makes them negligent. Some of the most important advances in sciences over the past century are in the domain of computational physics. The brain is a matter of computational physics, and is therefore in the domain of computational physics. Not psychiatry. Without physics, you cannot understand the brain. Psychiatrists are so thick headed that they are unaware of this.

Psychiatrists are arrogant. They think they own the brain, but most psychiatrists can't do even elementary mathematics. Disqualified!

@jaymaron Psychiatrists must be MD's or DO's. Are you saying that MD's and DO's don't study physics? Surely you jest.

@TyKC

I teach the physics class that MDs have to pass to get into medical school.

In general, MDs are poor at physics. They also tend to not care about physics. All they care about is passing. Many are whiners.

1

I'm certainly glad MSN led with the utterly irrelevant fact that John Pierce is a conservative. That lets their core audience know they're supposed to hate him.

It wasn't MSM, it was Law & Crime. And I think you missed the point. It's hard to hate someone who is in the hospital on a ventilator. Even liberals do that rarely. But you certainly can sympathize with clients who are inappropriately represented.

@TyKC

No, pretty sure I didn't miss the point of whomever wrote the article choosing to insert that useless piece of information in the upfront.

The point of the article? I wasn't even commenting on that.

@Alysandir Again, it becomes about who wrote the article instead of what the article says. Besides, if you only read articles with no useless facts in them, you don't read many articles.

@TyKC - Yeah, that must be it. Clearly, I have no cause to complain about framing that has nothing to do with the actual item being reported - intended solely to steer the reader's attitude before the meat of the article is even begun - because all articles have it. Except I'm apparently not erudite or well-read enough to understand that.

Tell me more about how stupid you think I am. This is fascinating stuff.

@Alysandir Well, you make assumptions about the author(s) intent, and you are entitled to your opinion regardless of how bias or ill thought out that opinion it might be. I could say more, but I have neither the time or the inclination to do so.

1

John le Carré couldn't make this up.

You can include a link to this post in your posts and comments by including the text q:261861
Slug does not evaluate or guarantee the accuracy of any content. Read full disclaimer.