slug.com slug.com

5 2

Science is the end all be all when it comes to creation/evolution but we throw science out the window when it comes to biology. Explain.

Rdub4ND 5 Apr 4
Share

Be part of the movement!

Welcome to the community for those who value free speech, evidence and civil discourse.

Create your free account

5 comments

Feel free to reply to any comment by clicking the "Reply" button.

0

So I tried to frame the question in a way that it might not be clear my position. I think successfully...lol. So here's what I'm saying. If you are talking to a progressive about the beginning of human life their rebuttal is science is the answer. How could you be so stupid to believe in a creator when we have so much science to prove evolution? Then we come around and talk about gender. X/Y chromosomes. Male/female. Biology vs social construct. Now the X/Y chromosomes aren't enough. Biology/science isn't enough to explain this phenomenon. Now it's a social construct. So what it boils down to in my opinion is hypocrisy from the progressive left. Our scientific process successfully proves evolution but it isn't sufficient for gender. Tell me why I'm wrong or how to put a finer point on my argument. Thanks

1

Science is not the end all be all of anything. Science is the attempt to understand or know things. Some things we know, like there are two genders. Most things we don't know, so we have science.

1

Common core education.

1

Science is only settled when you agree with it

1

You are talking about mixing politics and science. It's called "scientism". The attempt to make politicians believable.

Write Comment
You can include a link to this post in your posts and comments by including the text q:27511
Slug does not evaluate or guarantee the accuracy of any content. Read full disclaimer.